Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.668 IF 5.668
  • IF 5-year value: 6.201 IF 5-year
    6.201
  • CiteScore value: 6.13 CiteScore
    6.13
  • SNIP value: 1.633 SNIP 1.633
  • IPP value: 5.91 IPP 5.91
  • SJR value: 2.938 SJR 2.938
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 174 Scimago H
    index 174
  • h5-index value: 87 h5-index 87
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-856
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-856
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: research article 16 Oct 2019

Submitted as: research article | 16 Oct 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Methanethiol, dimethyl sulfide and acetone over biologically productive waters in the SW Pacific Ocean

Sarah J. Lawson1, Cliff S. Law2,3, Mike J. Harvey2, Tom G. Bell4, Carolyn F. Walker2, Warren J. De Bruyn5, and Eric S. Saltzman6 Sarah J. Lawson et al.
  • 1Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Oceans and A tmosphere, Aspendale, Australia
  • 2National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
  • 3Dept. Chemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
  • 4Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK
  • 5Schmidt College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, California, CA, USA
  • 6Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, California, USA

Abstract. Atmospheric methanethiol (MeSHa), dimethyl sulfide (DMSa) and acetone (acetonea) were measured over biologically productive frontal waters in the remote South West Pacific Ocean in summertime 2012 during the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) voyage. MeSHa mixing ratios varied from below detection limit (< 10 ppt) up to 65 ppt and were 3–36 % of parallel DMSa mixing ratios. MeSHa and DMSa were correlated over the voyage (R2 = 0.3, slope = 0.07) with a stronger correlation over a coccolithophore-dominated phytoplankton bloom (R2 = 0.5, slope 0.13). The diurnal cycle for MeSHa shows similar behaviour to DMSa with mixing ratios varying by a factor of ~ 2 according to time of day with the minimum levels of both MeSHa and DMSa occurring at around 16:00 hrs. A positive flux of MeSH was calculated for 3 different nights and ranged from 3.5–5.8 µmol m−2 day−1 corresponding to 14–24 % of the DMS flux (MeSH / (MeSH + DMS). Spearman rank correlations with ocean biogeochemical parameters showed a moderate to strong positive and highly significant relationship between both MeSHa and DMSa with seawater DMS (DMSsw), and a moderate correlation with total dimethylsulfoniopropionate (total DMSP). A positive correlation of acetonea with water temperature and negative correlation with nutrient concentrations is consistent with reports of acetone production in warmer subtropical waters. Positive correlations of acetonea with cryptophyte and eukaryotic phytoplankton numbers, and high molecular weight sugars and Chromophoric Dissolved Organic Matter (CDOM), suggest an organic source. This work points to a significant ocean source of MeSH, highlighting the need for further studies into the distribution and fate of MeSH, and suggests links between atmospheric acetone levels and biogeochemistry over the mid-latitude ocean.

In addition, an intercalibration of DMSa at ambient levels using three independently calibrated instruments showed ~ 15–25 % higher mixing ratios from an Atmospheric Pressure Ionisation-Chemical Ionisation Mass Spectrometer (mesoCIMS) compared to a Gas Chromatograph with Sulfur Chemiluminescence Detector (GC-SCD) and proton transfer reaction mass spectrometer (PTR-MS). PTR-MS and mesoCIMS showed similar temporal behaviour with differences in ambient mixing ratios likely influenced by the DMSa gradient above the sea surface.

Sarah J. Lawson et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 11 Dec 2019)
Status: open (until 11 Dec 2019)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Sarah J. Lawson et al.
Data sets

DMS, acetone, methanethiol atmospheric data from SOAP voyage S. Lawson https://doi.org/10.25919/5d914b00c5759

Sarah J. Lawson et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 262 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
201 55 6 262 5 5
  • HTML: 201
  • PDF: 55
  • XML: 6
  • Total: 262
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Oct 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Oct 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 221 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 220 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 11 Nov 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Methanethiol (MeSH) is a reduced sulfur gas originating from phytoplankton, with a global ocean source ~ 17 % of dimethyl sulphide (DMS). It has been little studied, and is rarely observed over the ocean. In this work, MeSH was measured at much higher levels than previously observed (3–36 % of parallel DMS mixing ratios). MeSH could be a significant source of atmospheric sulfur over productive regions of the ocean, but its distribution, and its atmospheric impact requires more investigation.
Methanethiol (MeSH) is a reduced sulfur gas originating from phytoplankton, with a global ocean...
Citation