Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.509 IF 5.509
  • IF 5-year value: 5.689 IF 5-year
    5.689
  • CiteScore value: 5.44 CiteScore
    5.44
  • SNIP value: 1.519 SNIP 1.519
  • SJR value: 3.032 SJR 3.032
  • IPP value: 5.37 IPP 5.37
  • h5-index value: 86 h5-index 86
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 161 Scimago H
    index 161
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-193
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-193
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Peer-reviewed comment 04 Mar 2019

Peer-reviewed comment | 04 Mar 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Comment on the paper Insignificant effect of climate change on winter haze pollution in Beijing by Shen et al. (2018)

Run Liu1, Lu Mao2, Shaw Chen Liu1, Yuanhang Zhang2, Hong Liao3, Huopo Chen4, and Yuhang Wang5 Run Liu et al.
  • 1Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • 2State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • 3School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
  • 4Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China
  • 5School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA

Abstract. The recent paper by Shen et al. (2018) (referred to hereafter as SHEN) made a sweeping statement on the winter haze pollution in Beijing by claiming “Insignificant effect of climate change on winter haze in Beijing”. We argue that the paper contains three serious flaws. Either one of the three flaws can nullify the claim of SHEN.

Run Liu et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 25 May 2019)
Status: open (until 25 May 2019)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Run Liu et al.
Run Liu et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 1,166 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
809 352 5 1,166 1 5
  • HTML: 809
  • PDF: 352
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 1,166
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Mar 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Mar 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 853 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 853 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 25 May 2019
Publications Copernicus
Short summary
The recent paper by Shen et al. (2018) (referred to hereafter as SHEN) made a sweeping statement on the winter haze pollution in Beijing by claiming Insignificant effect of climate change on winter haze in Beijing. We argue that the paper contains three serious flaws. Either one of the three flaws can nullify the claim of SHEN.
The recent paper by Shen et al. (2018) (referred to hereafter as SHEN) made a sweeping statement...
Citation