Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.509 IF 5.509
  • IF 5-year value: 5.689 IF 5-year
    5.689
  • CiteScore value: 5.44 CiteScore
    5.44
  • SNIP value: 1.519 SNIP 1.519
  • SJR value: 3.032 SJR 3.032
  • IPP value: 5.37 IPP 5.37
  • h5-index value: 86 h5-index 86
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 161 Scimago H
    index 161
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-177
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-177
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 27 Feb 2019

Research article | 27 Feb 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Modelling CO2 weather – why horizontal resolution matters

Anna Agustí-Panareda1, Michail Diamantakis1, Sébastien Massart1, Frédéric Chevallier2, Joaquín Muñoz-Sabater1, Jérôme Barré1, Roger Curcoll3, Richard Engelen1, Bavo Langerock4, Rachel Law5, Zoë Loh5, Josep Anton Morguí3, Mark Parrington1, Vincent-Henri Peuch1, Michel Ramonet2, Coleen Roehl6, Alex T. Vermeulen7, Thorsten Warneke8, and Debra Wunch9 Anna Agustí-Panareda et al.
  • 1European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Park, Reading, RG2 9AX, United Kingdom
  • 2Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 3Environmental Science and Technology Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ICTA-UAB, Bellaterra, Spain
  • 4Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Brussels, Belgium
  • 5CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, PMB 1, Aspendale, Victoria 3195, Australia
  • 6California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
  • 7ICOS ERIC-Carbon Portal, Sölvegatan 12, 22362 Lund, Sweden
  • 8University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics, Otto-Hahn-Allee 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany
  • 9University of Toronto, Department of Physics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract. Climate change mitigation efforts require information on the current greenhouse gas atmospheric concentrations and their sources and sinks. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the most abundant anthropogenic greenhouse gas. Its variability in the atmosphere is modulated by the synergy between weather and CO2 surface fluxes, often referred to as CO2 weather. It is interpreted with the help of global or regional numerical transport models, with horizontal resolutions ranging from a few hundreds of km to a few km. Changes in the model horizontal resolution affect not only atmospheric transport, but also the representation of topography and surface CO2 fluxes. This paper assesses the impact of horizontal resolution on the simulated atmospheric CO2 variability with a numerical weather prediction model. The simulations are performed using the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) CO2 forecasting system at different resolutions from 9 km to 80 km and are evaluated using in situ atmospheric surface measurements and atmospheric column-mean observations of CO2, as well as radiosonde and SYNOP observations of the winds.

The results indicate that both diurnal and day-to-day variability of atmospheric CO2 are generally better represented at high resolution, as shown by a reduction in the errors in simulated wind and CO2. Mountain stations display the largest improvements at high resolution as they directly benefit from the more realistic orography. In addition, the CO2 spatial gradients are generally improved with increasing resolution for both stations near the surface and those observing the total column, as the overall inter-station error is also reduced in magnitude. However, close to emission hotspots, the high resolution can also lead to a deterioration of the simulation skill, highlighting uncertainties in the high resolution fluxes that are more diffuse at lower resolutions.

We conclude that increasing horizontal resolution matters for modelling CO2 weather because it has the potential to bring together improvements in the surface representation of both winds and CO2 fluxes, as well as an expected reduction in numerical errors of transport. Modelling applications like atmospheric inversion systems to estimate surface fluxes will only be able to benefit fully from upgrades in horizontal resolution if the topography, winds and prior flux distribution are also upgraded accordingly. It is clear from the results that an additional increase in resolution might reduce errors even further. However, the horizontal resolution sensitivity tests indicate that the change in the CO2 and wind modelling error with resolution is not linear, making it difficult to extrapolate the results beyond the tested resolutions.

Finally, we show that the high resolution simulations are useful for the assessment of the small-scale variability of CO2 which cannot be represented in coarser resolution models. These representativeness errors need to be considered when assimilating in situ data and high resolution satellite data such as Greenhouse gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT), Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2), the Chinese Carbon Dioxide Observation Satellite Mission (TanSat) and future missions such as the Geostationary Carbon Observatory (GeoCarb) and the Sentinel satellite constellation for CO2. For these reasons, the high resolution CO2 simulations provided by the CAMS in real-time can be useful to estimate such small-scale variability in real time, as well as providing boundary conditions for regional modelling studies and supporting field experiments.

Anna Agustí-Panareda et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 24 Apr 2019)
Status: open (until 24 Apr 2019)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Anna Agustí-Panareda et al.
Anna Agustí-Panareda et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 430 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
266 160 4 430 18 3 6
  • HTML: 266
  • PDF: 160
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 430
  • Supplement: 18
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 316 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 316 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 23 Mar 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This paper demonstrates the benefits of using global models with high horizontal resolution to represent atmospheric CO2 patterns associated with evolving weather. The modelling of CO2 weather is crucial to interpret the variability from ground-based and satellite CO2 observations, which can then used to infer CO2 fluxes in atmospheric inversions. The benefits of high resolution come from an improved representation of the topography, winds, tracer transport and CO2 flux distribution.
This paper demonstrates the benefits of using global models with high horizontal resolution to...
Citation