Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.509 IF 5.509
  • IF 5-year value: 5.689 IF 5-year 5.689
  • CiteScore value: 5.44 CiteScore 5.44
  • SNIP value: 1.519 SNIP 1.519
  • SJR value: 3.032 SJR 3.032
  • IPP value: 5.37 IPP 5.37
  • h5-index value: 86 h5-index 86
  • Scimago H index value: 161 Scimago H index 161
Discussion papers | Copyright
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 09 Apr 2018

Research article | 09 Apr 2018

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of the manuscript was accepted for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Source apportionment of fine particulate matter in Houston, Texas: Insights to secondary organic aerosols

Ibrahim M. Al-Naiema1, Anusha P. S. Hettiyadura1, Henry W. Wallace2, Nancy P. Sanchez2, Carter J. Madler1, Basak Karacurt Cevik2,3, Alexander A. T. Bui2, Josh Kettler1, Robert J. Griffin2, and Elizabeth A. Stone1,4 Ibrahim M. Al-Naiema et al.
  • 1Department of Chemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
  • 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, 77005 USA
  • 3Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Yalova University, Yalova, 77100, Turkey
  • 4Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA

Abstract. Online and offline measurements of fine particulate matter (PM) near the urban and industrial Houston Ship Channel in Houston, Texas, USA during May 2015 were utilized to characterize its chemical composition and to evaluate the relative contributions of primary, secondary, biogenic, and anthropogenic sources. Aerosol mass spectrometry (AMS) on non-refractory PM1 (PM1µm) indicated major contributions from sulfate (averaging 50%), organic aerosol (OA, 40%), and ammonium (14%). Positive matrix factorization (PMF) of AMS data categorized OA on average as 22% hydrocarbon-like organic aerosol (HOA), 29% cooking influenced semi-volatile oxygenated organic aerosol (CI-SV-OOA), and 48% low-volatility oxygenated organic aerosol (LV-OOA), with the latter two sources indicative of secondary organic aerosol (SOA). Chemical analysis of PM2.5 (PM2.5µm) filter samples agreed that organic matter (35%) and sulfate (21%) were the most abundant components. Organic speciation of PM2.5 organic carbon (OC) focused on molecular markers of primary sources and SOA tracers derived from biogenic and anthropogenic volatile organic compounds (VOC). The sources of PM2.5 OC were estimated using molecular marker-based positive matric factorization (MM-PMF) and chemical mass balance (CMB) models. MM-PMF resolved 9 factors that were identified as diesel engines (11.5%), gasoline engines (24.3%), non-tailpipe vehicle emissions (11.1%), ship emissions (2.2%), cooking (1.0%), biomass burning (BB, 10.6%), isoprene SOA (11.0%), high-NOx anthropogenic SOA (6.6%), and low-NOx anthropogenic SOA (21.7%). Using available source profiles, CMB apportioned 41% of OC to primary fossil sources (gasoline engines, diesel engines, and ship emissions), 5% to BB, 15% to SOA (including 7.4% biogenic and 7.6% anthropogenic), and 39% to other sources that were not included in the model and are expected to be secondary. This study presents the first application of in situ AMS-PMF, MM-PMF, and CMB for OC source apportionment and the integration of these methods to evaluate the relative roles of biogenic, anthopogenic, and BB-SOA. The three source apportionment models agreed that ~50% of OC is associated with primary emissions from fossil fuel use, particularly motor vehicles. Differences among the models reflect their ability to resolve sources based upon the input chemical measurements, with molecular marker-based methods providing greater source specificity and resolution for minor sources. By combining results from MM-PMF and CMB, BB was estimated to contribute 11% of OC, with 5% of primary emissions and 6% BB-SOA. SOA was dominantly anthropogenic (28%) compared to biogenic (11%) or BB-derived. The three-model approach demonstrates significant contributions of anthropogenic SOA to fine PM. More broadly, the findings and methodologies presented herein can be used to advance local and regional understanding of anthropogenic contributions to SOA.

Download & links
Ibrahim M. Al-Naiema et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: final response (author comments only)
Status: final response (author comments only)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Login for Authors/Co-Editors] [Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Ibrahim M. Al-Naiema et al.
Ibrahim M. Al-Naiema et al.
Total article views: 662 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
461 188 13 662 43 7 13
  • HTML: 461
  • PDF: 188
  • XML: 13
  • Total: 662
  • Supplement: 43
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Apr 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Apr 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 662 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 661 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
No saved metrics found.
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 24 Sep 2018
Publications Copernicus
Short summary
By integrating newly-developed tracers for anthropogenic secondary organic aerosol in source apportionment for the first time, we estimate that this source contributes 28 % of fine particle organic carbon in the Houston Ship Channel. Our approach can be used to evaluate anthropogenic, biogenic, and biomass burning contributions to secondary organic aerosols elsewhere in the world. Because anthropogenic emissions are potentially controllable, they provide an opportunity to improve air quality.
By integrating newly-developed tracers for anthropogenic secondary organic aerosol in source...