Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-434
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
19 May 2017
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of this manuscript was accepted for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP) and is expected to appear here in due course.
Impacts of Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering on Tropospheric Ozone
Lili Xia1, Peer J. Nowack2, Simone Tilmes3, and Alan Robock1 1Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
2Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
3Atmospheric Chemistry Division, National Center of Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Abstract. A range of solar radiation management (SRM) techniques has been proposed to counter anthropogenic climate change. Here, we examine the potential effects of stratospheric sulfate aerosol and solar insolation reduction on tropospheric ozone and ozone at Earth’s surface. Ozone is a key air pollutant, which can produce respiratory diseases and crop damage. Using a version of the Community Earth System Model from the National Center for Atmospheric Research that includes comprehensive tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry, we model both stratospheric sulfur injection and solar irradiance reduction schemes, with the aim of achieving equal levels of surface cooling relative to the Representative Concentration Pathway 6.0 scenario. This allows us to compare the impacts of sulfate aerosol and solar dimming on atmospheric ozone concentrations. Despite nearly identical global mean surface temperatures for the two SRM approaches, solar insolation reduction increases global average surface ozone concentrations while sulfate injection decreases it. A key difference between the two geoengineering schemes is the importance of heterogeneous reactions in the photochemical ozone balance with larger stratospheric sulfate abundance, resulting in increased ozone depletion in mid- and high latitudes. This reduces the net transport of stratospheric ozone into the troposphere and thus is a key driver of the overall decrease in surface ozone. At the same time, the change in stratospheric ozone alters the tropospheric photochemical environment due to enhanced ultraviolet radiation. A shared factor among both SRM scenarios is decreased chemical ozone loss due to reduced tropospheric humidity. Under insolation reduction, this is the dominant factor giving rise to the global surface ozone increase. Regionally, both surface ozone increases and decreases are found for both scenarios, that is, SRM would affect regions of the world differently in terms of air pollution. In conclusion, surface ozone and tropospheric chemistry would likely be affected by SRM, but the overall effect is strongly dependent on the SRM scheme. Due to the health and economic impacts of surface ozone, all these impacts should be taken into account in evaluations of possible consequences of SRM.

Citation: Xia, L., Nowack, P. J., Tilmes, S., and Robock, A.: Impacts of Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering on Tropospheric Ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-434, in review, 2017.
Lili Xia et al.
Lili Xia et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 840 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
657 152 31 840 18 10 33

Views and downloads (calculated since 19 May 2017)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 May 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 840 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 835 with geography defined and 5 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 23 Sep 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Ozone is a key air pollutant. We model stratospheric sulfur injection and solar irradiance reduction schemes to compare their impacts on atmospheric ozone concentrations. With the nearly identical global mean surface temperature reduction, solar dimming increases global average surface ozone concentrations while sulfate injection decreases it. This difference is due to different stratosphere troposphere exchange of ozone and tropospheric ozone chemistry in the two scenarios.
Ozone is a key air pollutant. We model stratospheric sulfur injection and solar irradiance...
Share