Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
23 May 2017
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of this manuscript was accepted for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP) and is expected to appear here in due course.
Assessment of upper tropospheric and stratospheric water vapour and ozone in reanalyses as part of S-RIP
Sean M. Davis1,2, Michaela I. Hegglin3, Masatomo Fujiwara4, Rossana Dragani5, Yayoi Harada6, Chiaki Kobayashi6,7, Craig Long8, Gloria L. Manney9,10, Eric Nash11, Gerald L. Potter12, Susann Tegtmeier13, Tao Wang14, Krzysztof Wargan11,15, and Jonathon S. Wright16 1Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
2Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
3Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6BX, UK
4Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan
5European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, RG2 9AX, UK
6Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, 100-8122, Japan
7Climate Research Department, Meteorological Research Institute, JMA, Tsukuba, 305-0052, Japan
8Climate Prediction Center, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, College Park, MD 20740, USA
9NorthWest Research Associates, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
10Department of Physics, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
11Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, Maryland 20706, USA
12NASA Center for Climate Simulation, Code 606.2, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt MD 20771, USA
13GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, 24105, Germany
14NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
15Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Code 610.1, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
16Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Abstract. Reanalysis data sets are widely used to understand atmospheric processes and past variability, and are often used to stand in as “observations” for comparisons with climate model output. Because of the central role of water vapour (WV) and ozone (O3) in climate change, it is important to understand how accurately and consistently these species are represented in existing global reanalyses. In this paper, we present the results of WV and O3 intercomparisons that have been performed as part of the SPARC (Stratosphere-troposphere Processes and their Role in Climate) Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP). The comparisons cover a range of timescales and evaluate both inter-reanalysis and observation-reanalysis differences. We also provide a systematic documentation of the treatment of WV and O3 in current reanalyses to aid future research and guide the interpretation of differences amongst reanalysis fields.

The assimilation of total column ozone (TCO) observations in newer reanalyses results in realistic representations of TCO in reanalyses except when data coverage is lacking, such as during polar night. The vertical distribution of ozone is also relatively well represented in the stratosphere in reanalyses, particularly given the relatively weak constraints on ozone vertical structure provided by most assimilated observations and the simplistic representations of ozone photochemical processes in most of the reanalysis forecast models. However, significant biases in the vertical distribution of ozone are found in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in all reanalyses.

In contrast to O3, reanalysis estimates of stratospheric WV are not directly constrained by assimilated data. Observations of atmospheric humidity are typically used only in the troposphere, below a specified vertical level at or near the tropopause. The fidelity of reanalysis stratospheric WV products is therefore mainly dependent on the reanalyses' representation of the physical drivers that influence stratospheric WV, such as temperatures in the tropical tropopause layer, methane oxidation, and the stratospheric overturning circulation. The lack of assimilated observations and known deficiencies in the representation of stratospheric transport in reanalyses result in much poorer agreement amongst observational and reanalysis estimates of stratospheric WV. Hence, stratospheric WV products from the current generation of reanalyses should generally not be used in scientific studies.

Citation: Davis, S. M., Hegglin, M. I., Fujiwara, M., Dragani, R., Harada, Y., Kobayashi, C., Long, C., Manney, G. L., Nash, E., Potter, G. L., Tegtmeier, S., Wang, T., Wargan, K., and Wright, J. S.: Assessment of upper tropospheric and stratospheric water vapour and ozone in reanalyses as part of S-RIP, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,, in review, 2017.
Sean M. Davis et al.
Interactive discussionStatus: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version      Supplement - Supplement
RC1: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 Jul 2017 Printer-friendly Version 
AC1: 'Response', Sean Davis, 22 Aug 2017 Printer-friendly Version 
RC2: 'Pragmatic paper ...', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Jul 2017 Printer-friendly Version 
AC2: 'Response to Reviewer #2', Sean Davis, 23 Aug 2017 Printer-friendly Version 
Sean M. Davis et al.
Sean M. Davis et al.


Total article views: 562 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
384 151 27 562 18 11 26

Views and downloads (calculated since 23 May 2017)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 May 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 562 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 562 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1



Latest update: 19 Sep 2017
Publications Copernicus
Short summary
Ozone and water vapor in the stratosphere are important gases that affect surface climate and absorb incoming solar ultraviolet radiation. These gases are represented in reanalyses, which create a complete picture of the state of the Earth’s atmosphere using limited observations. We evaluate reanalysis water vapor and ozone fidelity by intercomparing them, and comparing them to independent observations. Generally reanalyses do a good job representing ozone, but have problems with water vapor.
Ozone and water vapor in the stratosphere are important gases that affect surface climate and...