Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.668 IF 5.668
  • IF 5-year value: 6.201 IF 5-year
    6.201
  • CiteScore value: 6.13 CiteScore
    6.13
  • SNIP value: 1.633 SNIP 1.633
  • IPP value: 5.91 IPP 5.91
  • SJR value: 2.938 SJR 2.938
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 174 Scimago H
    index 174
  • h5-index value: 87 h5-index 87
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-380
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-380
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Submitted as: research article 17 May 2016

Submitted as: research article | 17 May 2016

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). The revised manuscript was not accepted.

HSRL-2 aerosol optical measurements and microphysical retrievals vs. airborne in situ measurements during DISCOVER-AQ 2013: an intercomparison study

Patricia Sawamura1,2, Richard H. Moore1, Sharon P. Burton1, Eduard Chemyakin1,3, Detlef Müller4,3, Alexei Kolgotin5, Richard A. Ferrare1, Chris A. Hostetler1, Luke D. Ziemba1, Andreas J. Beyersdorf1, and Bruce E. Anderson1 Patricia Sawamura et al.
  • 1NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA
  • 2Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD, USA
  • 3Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, USA
  • 4University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK
  • 5Physics Instrumentation Center, Troitsk, Russia

Abstract. Over 700 vertically-resolved retrievals of effective radii, number, volume, and surface-area concentrations of aerosols obtained from inversion of airborne multiwavelength High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL-2) measurements are compared to vertically resolved airborne in situ measurements obtained during DISCOVER-AQ campaign from 2013 in California and Texas. In situ measurements of dry and humidified scattering, dry absorption, and dry size distributions are used to estimate hygroscopic adjustments which, in turn, are applied to the dry in situ measurements before comparison to HSRL-2 measurements and retrievals. The HSRL-2 retrievals of size parameters agree well with the in situ measurements once the hygroscopic adjustments are applied to the latter, with biases smaller than 25 % for surface-area concentrations, and smaller than 10 % for volume concentration. A closure study is performed by comparing the extinction and backscatter measured with the HSRL-2 with those calculated from the in situ size distributions and Mie theory, once refractive indices (at ambient RH) and hygroscopic adjustments are calculated and applied. The results of this closure study revealed discrepancies between the HSRL-2 optical measurements and those calculated from in situ measurements, in both California and Texas datasets, with the aerosol extinction and backscatter coefficients measured with the HSRL-2 being larger than those calculated from the adjusted in situ measurements and Mie theory. These discrepancies are further investigated and discussed in light of the many challenges often present in closure studies between in situ and remote sensing systems, such as: limitations in covering the same size range of particles with in situ and remote sensing instruments, as well as simplified parameterizations and assumptions used when dry in situ data are adjusted to account for aerosol hygroscopicity.

Patricia Sawamura et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Patricia Sawamura et al.
Patricia Sawamura et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 783 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
526 195 62 783 46 65
  • HTML: 526
  • PDF: 195
  • XML: 62
  • Total: 783
  • BibTeX: 46
  • EndNote: 65
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 May 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 May 2016)
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 07 Dec 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation