Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-1063
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review article
23 Dec 2016
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of the manuscript is under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Southeast Atmosphere Studies: learning from model-observation syntheses
Jingqiu Mao1, Annmarie Carlton2, Ronald C. Cohen3, William H. Brune4, Jose L. Jimenez5, Havala O. T. Pye6, Nga Lee Ng7, Brian McDonald8, Carsten Warneke8, Joost de Gouw8, Lorretta J. Mickley9, Eric M. Leibensperger10, Rohit Mathur6, and Larry Horowitz11 1Geophysical Institute and Department of Chemistry, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA
2Dept. of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
3Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
4Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
5Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
6National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
7School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering & School of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
8Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, Colorado, USA
9School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
10Center for Earth and Environmental Science, SUNY Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, NY, USA
11Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Abstract. Concentrations of atmospheric trace species in the United States have changed dramatically over the past several decades in response to pollution control strategies, shifts in domestic energy policy and economics, and economic development (and resulting emission changes) elsewhere in the world. Reliable projections of the future atmosphere require models to not only accurately describe current atmospheric concentrations; but to do so by representing chemical, physical and biological processes with conceptual and quantitative fidelity. Only through incorporation of the processes controlling emissions and chemical mechanisms that represent the key transformations among reactive molecules can models reliably project the impacts of future policy, energy, and climate scenarios. Efforts to properly identify and implement the fundamental and controlling mechanisms in atmospheric models benefit from intensive observation periods (IOPs), during which co-located measurements of diverse, speciated chemicals in both the gas and condensed phases are obtained. The Southeast Atmosphere Studies (SAS, including SENEX, SOAS, NOMADSS and SEAC4RS) conducted during the summer of 2013, provided an unprecedented opportunity for the atmospheric modeling community to come together to evaluate, diagnose, and improve the representation of fundamental climate and air quality processes in models of varying temporal and spatial scales.

In the summer of 2015 a group of experimentalists and modelers convened at the NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL), to discuss use of SAS observations to evaluate, diagnose, and improve air quality and climate modeling over the Southeast US. The effort focused primarily on model representation of fundamental atmospheric processes that are essential to the formation of ozone, secondary organic aerosols (SOA) and other trace species in the troposphere over the Southeastern US, with the ultimate goal of understanding the radiative impacts of these species in the Southeast and elsewhere. The workshop addressed questions surrounding four key themes: gas phase chemistry, aerosol chemistry, regional climate and chemistry interactions, and natural and anthropogenic emissions. This paper serves as a summary from this meeting and more importantly, as guidance for future modeling efforts.


Citation: Mao, J., Carlton, A., Cohen, R. C., Brune, W. H., Jimenez, J. L., Pye, H. O. T., Ng, N. L., McDonald, B., Warneke, C., de Gouw, J., Mickley, L. J., Leibensperger, E. M., Mathur, R., and Horowitz, L.: Southeast Atmosphere Studies: learning from model-observation syntheses, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-1063, in review, 2016.
Jingqiu Mao et al.
Jingqiu Mao et al.
Jingqiu Mao et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 630 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
436 161 33 630 12 39

Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Dec 2016)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Dec 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 630 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 627 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 19 Nov 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This paper serves as a summary from a workshop held at NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL), on model representation of fundamental atmospheric processes that are essential to the formation of ozone, secondary organic aerosols (SOA) and other trace species in the troposphere over the Southeastern US. This work may provide guidance for future modeling efforts in this region and elsewhere.
This paper serves as a summary from a workshop held at NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics...
Share