Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-4-2839-2004
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-4-2839-2004
24 May 2004
 | 24 May 2004
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

The mixing height in urban areas: comparative study for Copenhagen

A. Baklanov and A. Kuchin

Abstract. The urban boundary layer (UBL), in comparison with "rural" homogeneous atmospheric boundary layers, is characterised by greatly enhanced mixing, resulting from both the large surface roughness and increased surface heating, and by horizontal heterogeneity of the mixing height (MH) and other meteorological fields due to variations in surface roughness and heating from rural to central city areas. So, the UBL is considered as a specific case of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) over a non-homogeneous terrain. Therefore it is important to study how much the MH characteristics differ in urban and rural, marine or other more homogeneous areas. Most of the parameterisations of MH were developed for the conditions of a homogeneous terrain, so their applicability for urban conditions should be verified. Just a few authors suggested specific methods for MH determination in urban areas. In this paper the MH over urban, semi-urban, rural and marine areas of the Copenhagen metropolitan area is considered. Proceeding from the data from the Jægersborg radiosounding station measurement and analysis of different methods of the MH estimation, the peculiarities of the UBL and intercomparison of different MH estimation methods for urban and rural conditions are discussed. It is shown that the urban MH is considerably bigger for stably stratified (nocturnal) boundary layer cases in comparison with the "non-urban" MH. Daytime (usually the convective boundary layer) MH does not differ significatly in urban and "non-urban" sectors.

A. Baklanov and A. Kuchin
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
A. Baklanov and A. Kuchin
A. Baklanov and A. Kuchin

Viewed

Total article views: 807 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
294 397 116 807 90 107
  • HTML: 294
  • PDF: 397
  • XML: 116
  • Total: 807
  • BibTeX: 90
  • EndNote: 107
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 20 Apr 2024
Download
Altmetrics