Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-95
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
06 Feb 2017
Review status
A revision of this discussion paper is under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Atmospheric processes affecting the separation of volcanic ash and SO2 in volcanic eruptions: Inferences from the May 2011 Grímsvötn eruption
Fred Prata1, Mark Woodhouse2, Herbert E. Huppert3, Andrew Prata4, Thor Thordarson5, and Simon Carn6 1Visiting scientist, Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, UK
2School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Clifton, Bristol, UK
3Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, UK
4Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading, UK
5Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
6Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
Abstract. The separation of volcanic ash and sulphur dioxide (SO2) gas is sometimes observed during volcanic eruptions. The exact conditions under which separation occurs are not fully understood but the phenomenon is of importance because of the effects volcanic emissions have on aviation, on the environment and to the earth's radiation balance. The eruption of Grimsvotn, a subglacial volcano under the Vatnajokull glacier in Iceland during 21–28 May 2011 produced one of the most spectacular examples of ash and SO2 separation that led to errors in the forecasting of ash in the atmosphere over northern Europe. Satellite data from several sources coupled with meteorological wind data and photographic evidence suggest that the eruption column was unable to sustain itself, resulting in a large deposition of ash which left a low level ash-rich atmospheric plume moving southwards and then eastwards towards the southern Scandanavian coast, and a high level predominantly SO2 plume travelling northwards and then spreading eastwards and westwards. Here we provide observational and modelling perspectives on the separation of ash and SO2 and present quantitative estimates of the masses of ash and SO2 erupted, the directions of transport, and the likely impacts. We hypothesise that a partial column collapse or perhaps several occurred during the early stage of the eruption leading to an ash-laden gravity intrusion that was swept southwards, separated from the main column. Our model suggests that water-mediated aggregation caused enhanced ash removal because of the plentiful supply of source water from exsolved magmatic water, from melted glacial ice and from entrained atmospheric water. The analysis also suggests that ash and SO2 should be treated with separate source terms, leading to improvements in forecasting the movement of both types of emissions.

Citation: Prata, F., Woodhouse, M., Huppert, H. E., Prata, A., Thordarson, T., and Carn, S.: Atmospheric processes affecting the separation of volcanic ash and SO2 in volcanic eruptions: Inferences from the May 2011 Grímsvötn eruption, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-95, in review, 2017.
Fred Prata et al.
Fred Prata et al.
Fred Prata et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 538 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
402 93 43 538 18 14 42

Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Feb 2017)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Feb 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 538 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 534 with geography defined and 4 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 24 Jun 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This paper investigates the separation of gases and particles that frequently occurs during violent volcanic eruptions. The problem is important because atmospheric winds spread volcanic aerosols at great distances from the source and wind shear then causes the aerosols to spread in different directions at different altitudes. This has important repercussions for the accurate forecasting the movement of hazardous volcanic clouds. The May 2011 Grimsvotn eruption was studied in great detail.
This paper investigates the separation of gases and particles that frequently occurs during...
Share