Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
doi:10.5194/acp-2016-1120
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
10 Feb 2017
Review status
This discussion paper is under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Aerosols at the Poles: An AeroCom Phase II multi-model evaluation
Maria Sand1, Bjørn H. Samset1, Yves Balkanski2, Susanne Bauer3, Nicolas Bellouin4, Terje K. Berntsen1,5, Huisheng Bian6, Mian Chin7, Thomas Diehl8, Richard Easter9, Steven J. Ghan9, Trond Iversen10, Alf Kirkevåg10, Jean-François Lamarque11, Guangxing Lin9, Xiaohong Liu12, Gan Luo14, Gunnar Myhre1, Twan van Noije14, Joyce E. Penner19, Michael Schulz10, Øyvind Seland10, Ragnhild B. Skeie1, Philip Stier15, Toshihiko Takemura16, Kostas Tsigaridis3, Fangqun Yu13, Kai Zhang17,9, and Hua Zhang18 1Center for International Climate and Environmental Research – Oslo (CICERO), Oslo, Norway
2Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
3NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Columbia Earth Institute, New York, NY, USA
4Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK
5Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
6Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
7NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
8Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy
9Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
10Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
11National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
12Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, USA
13Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, State University of New York at Albany, New York, USA
14Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, The Netherlands
15Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
16Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
17Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
18Laboratory for Climate Studies, National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China
19Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Abstract. Atmospheric aerosols from anthropogenic and natural sources reach the Polar Regions through long-range transport. Such transport is however poorly constrained in present day global climate models, and few multi-model evaluations of Polar anthropogenic aerosol radiative forcing exist. Here we compare the aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 550 nm from simulations with 16 global aerosol models from the AeroCom phase II model inter-comparison project with available observations at both Poles. We show that the annual mean multi-model median is representative of the observations in Arctic, but that the inter-model spread is large. We also document the geographical distribution and seasonal cycle of the AOD for the individual aerosol species; black carbon (BC) from fossil fuel and biomass burning, sulfate, organic aerosols (OA), dust and sea-salt. For a subset of models that represent nitrate and secondary organic aerosols (SOA), we document the role of these aerosols at high latitudes. The seasonal dependence of natural and anthropogenic aerosols differs with natural aerosols peaking in the winter (sea-salt) and spring (dust), whereas AOD from anthropogenic aerosols peaks during late spring/summer. The models produce a median annual mean (AOD) of 0.07 in the Arctic (defined here as north of 60° N). The models also predict a noteworthy aerosol transport to the Antarctic (south of 70° S) with a resulting AOD varying between 0.01–0.02. The models have also estimated the shortwave anthropogenic radiative forcing contributions to the direct aerosol effect (DAE) associated with BC and OA from fossil fuel and biofuel (FF), sulfate, SOA, nitrate, and biomass burning from BC and OA emissions combined. The Arctic modeled annual mean DAE is slightly negative (−0.12 W m−2), dominated by a positive BC FF DAE during spring and a negative sulfate DAE during summer. The Antarctic DAE is governed by BC FF. We perform sensitivity experiments with one of the AeroCom models (GISS modelE) to investigate how regional emissions of BC and sulfate and the lifetime of BC influence the Arctic and Antarctic AOD. A doubling of emissions in East Asia, result in a 33 % increase in Arctic AOD of BC. However, radical changes such as reducing the e-folding lifetime by half or doubling it, still fall within the AeroCom model range.

Citation: Sand, M., Samset, B. H., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Bellouin, N., Berntsen, T. K., Bian, H., Chin, M., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Ghan, S. J., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Lamarque, J.-F., Lin, G., Liu, X., Luo, G., Myhre, G., van Noije, T., Penner, J. E., Schulz, M., Seland, Ø., Skeie, R. B., Stier, P., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., Yu, F., Zhang, K., and Zhang, H.: Aerosols at the Poles: An AeroCom Phase II multi-model evaluation, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., doi:10.5194/acp-2016-1120, in review, 2017.
Maria Sand et al.
Maria Sand et al.
Maria Sand et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 214 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
153 50 11 214 8 3 12

Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2017)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 214 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 213 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 24 Mar 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The role of aerosols in the changing Polar climate is not well understood and the aerosols are poorly constrained in models. In this study we have compared output from 16 different aerosol models with available observations at both Poles. We show that the model median is representative of the observations, but that the model spread is large. The Arctic direct aerosol radiative effect over the industrial area is positive during spring due to black carbon and negative during summer due to sulfate.
The role of aerosols in the changing Polar climate is not well understood and the aerosols are...
Share