<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>9</volume_number>
		<issue_number>6</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-9-24731-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/24731/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/24731/2009/acpd-9-24731-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/24731/2009/acpd-9-24731-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>24731</start_page>
	<end_page>24753</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-11-18</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Estimations of climate sensitivity based on top-of-atmosphere radiation imbalance</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>B. Lin</name>
			<email>bing.lin@nasa.gov</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>L. Chambers</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>P. Stackhouse Jr.</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>B. Wielicki</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1">
			<name>Y. Hu</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="1">
			<name>P. Minnis</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="1">
			<name>N. Loeb</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="2">
			<name>W. Sun</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="3">
			<name>G. Potter</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="4">
			<name>Q. Min</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="1">
			<name>G. Schuster</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="12" affiliations="2">
			<name>T.-F. Fan</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">SSAI, One Enterprise Parkway, Hampton, VA 23666, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY 12222, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Large climate feedback uncertainties limit the accuracy in predicting the
response of the Earth&apos;s climate to the increase of CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; concentration
within the atmosphere. This study explores a potential to reduce
uncertainties in climate sensitivity estimations using energy balance
analysis, especially top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiation imbalance. The
time-scales studied generally cover from decade to century, that is,
middle-range climate sensitivity is considered, which is directly related to
the climate issue caused by atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; change. The significant
difference between current analysis and previous energy balance models is
that the current study targets at the boundary condition problem instead of
solving the initial condition problem. Additionally, climate system memory
and deep ocean heat transport are considered. The climate feedbacks are
obtained based on the constraints of the TOA radiation imbalance and surface
temperature measurements of the present climate.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Currently, there is a lack of high accuracy measurements of TOA radiation
imbalance. Available estimations indicate that TOA net radiative heating to
the climate system is about 0.85 W/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. Based on this value, a positive
climate feedback with a feedback coefficient ranging from &amp;minus;1.3 to &amp;minus;1.0 W/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;/K
is found. The range of feedback coefficient is determined by
climate system memory. The longer the memory, the stronger the positive
feedback. The estimated time constant of the climate is large (70~120
years) mainly owing to the deep ocean heat transport, implying that the
system may be not in an equilibrium state under the external forcing during
the industrial era. For the doubled-CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; climate (or 3.7 W/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;
forcing), the estimated global warming would be 3.1 K if the current
estimate of 0.85 W/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; TOA net radiative heating could be confirmed.
With accurate long-term measurements of TOA radiation, the analysis method
suggested by this study provides a great potential in the estimations of
middle-range climate sensitivity.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Aires, F. and Rossow, W. R.: Inferring instantaneous, multivariate and nonlinear sensitivities for analysis of feedbacks in a dynamical system: Lorentz model case study, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 239–275, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Blender, R., Fraedrich, K., and Hunt, B.: Millennial climate variability: GCM-simulation and Greenland ice core, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L04710, doi:10.1029/2005GL024919, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Dickinson, R.: Convergence rate and stability of ocean-atmosphere coupling schemes with a zero-dimensional climate model, J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 2112–2120, 1981. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Hansen, J., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Russell, G., Stone, P., Fung, I., Ruedy, R., and Lerner, J. 1984: Climate sensitivity: Analysis of feedback mechanisms, in: Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity, AGU Geophys. Monogr., 29, Maurice Ewing Vol. 5, edited by: Hansen, J. E. and Takahashi, T., American Geophysical Union, 130–163. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., and Reynolds, R.: Global surface air temperature in 1995: Return to pre-Pinatubo level, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 1665–1668, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Hansen, J., Nazarenko, L., Ruedy, R., and coauthors: Earth&apos;s energy imbalance: Confirmation and implications, Science, 308, 1431–1435, 2005 . </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Russell, G., Lea, D., and Siddall, M.: Climate change and trace gases, Phil. Trans. R. Soc., A., 365, 1925–1954, doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2052, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> IPCC: Summary for Policymakers, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Kiehl, J.: Twentieth century climate model response and climate sensitivity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L22710, doi:10.1029/2007GL031383, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Lin, B., Stackhouse, P., Minnis, P., Wielicki, B., Hu, Y., Sun, W., Fan, T.-F., and Hinkelman, L.: Assessment of global annual atmospheric energy balance from satellite observations, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16114, doi:10.1029/2008JD009869, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Lindzen, R. and Giannitsis, C.: On the climate implications of volcanic cooling, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 5929–5941, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Manabe, S., Bryan, K., and Spelman, M.: Transient response of a global ocean-atmosphere model to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide, J. Phys. Ocean., 20, 722–749, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Roe, G. and Baker, M.: Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable, Science, 318, 629–632, 2007,. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Schwartz, S.: Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth&apos;s climate system, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S05, doi:10.1029/2007/2007JD008746, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Trenberth, K., Fasullo, J., and Kiehl, J.: Earth&apos;s global energy budget: B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 90, 311–323, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Von Storch, J.-S.: On statistical dissipation in GCM-climate, Clim. Dynam., 23, 1–15, doi:10.1007/s00382-004-0404-2, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Wielicki, B. A., Wong, T., Allan, R., and coauthors: Evidence for large decadal variability in the tropical mean radiative energy budget, Science, 295, 841–844, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Willis, J., Roemmich, D., and Cornuelle, B.: Interannual variability in upper-ocean heat content, temperature, and thermosteric expansion on global scales, J. Geophys. Res., 109, C12036, doi:10.1029/2003JC002260, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Wong, T., Wielicki, B. A., and Lee III, R. B.: Reexamination of the observed decadal variability of earth radiation budget using altitude-corrected ERBE/ERBS nonscanner WFOV data, J. Clim., 19, 4028–4040, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Wu, W. and Dickinson, R.: Time scales of layered soil moisture memory in the context of land-atmosphere interaction, J. Clim., 17, 2752–2764, 2004. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

