<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>9</volume_number>
		<issue_number>6</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-9-24051-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/24051/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/24051/2009/acpd-9-24051-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/24051/2009/acpd-9-24051-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>24051</start_page>
	<end_page>24083</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-11-12</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Mercury emission and speciation of coal-fired power plants in China</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. Wang</name>
			<email>shxwang@tsinghua.edu.cn</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>L. Zhang</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>G. Li</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>Y. Wu</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Hao</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="2">
			<name>N. Pirrone</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="2">
			<name>F. Sprovieri</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="2">
			<name>M. P. Ancora</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, and State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">CNR – Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research, Via Salaria Km 29.300-CP10, 00015 Monterotondo St., Rome, Italy</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Comprehensive field measurements are needed to understand the mercury emissions from Chinese
      power plants and to improve the accuracy of emission inventories. Characterization
      of mercury emissions and their behavior were measured in six typical coal-fired power plants in
      China. During the tests, the flue gas was sampled simultaneously at inlet and outlet of
      selective catalyst reduction (SCR), electrostatic precipitators (ESP), and flue gas
      desulfurization (FGD) using the Ontario Hydro Method (OHM). The pulverized coal, bottom ash,
      fly ash and gypsum were also sampled in the field. Mercury concentrations in coal burned in
      the measured power plants ranged from 17 to 385 &amp;mu;g/kg. The
      mercury mass balances for the six power plants varied from 87 to 116% of the input
      coal mercury for the whole system. The total mercury concentrations in the flue gas from
      boilers were at the range of 1.92–27.15 &amp;mu;g/m&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;, which were significantly
      related to the mercury contents in burned coal. The mercury speciation in flue gas right
      after the boiler is influenced by the contents of halogen, mercury, and ash in the burned
      coal. The average mercury removal efficiencies of ESP, ESP plus wet FGD, and ESP plus dry
      FGD-FF systems were 24%, 73% and 66%, respectively, which were similar to the
      average removal efficiencies of pollution control device systems in other countries such as
      US, Japan and South Korea. The SCR system oxidized 16% elemental mercury and reduced
      about 32% of total mercury. Elemental mercury, accounting for 66–94% of total
      mercury, was the dominant species emitted to the atmosphere. The mercury emission factor
      was also calculated for each power plant.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> ASTM D6784-02: Standard test method for elemental, oxidized, particle-bound, and total mercury in flue gas generated from coal-fired stationary sources (Ontario-Hydro Method), ASTM International, Pennsylvania, USA, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Cao,~Y., Cheng,~C., Chen,~C., Liu,~M. , Wang,~C., and Pan,~W.: Abatement of mercury emissions in the coal combustion process equipped with a~Fabric Filter Baghouse, Fuel, 87, 3322–3330, 2008a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Cao,~Y., Gao,~Z., Zhu,~J., Wang,~Q., Huang,~Y., and Chiu,~C.: Impacts of halogen additions on mercury oxidation, in a~slipstream selective catalyst reduction (SCR), reactor when burning sub-bituminous coal, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(1), 256–261, 2008b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Chen,~L., Duan,~Y., Zhuo,~Y., Yang,~L., Zhang,~L., Yang,~X., Yao,~Q., Jiang,~Y., and Xu,~X.: Mercury transformation across particulate control devices in six power plants of China: The co-effect of chlorine and ash composition, Fuel, 86(4), 603–610, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Clack,~H.: Mercury capture within coal-fired power plant electrostatic precipitators: model evaluation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1460–1466, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Galbreath,~K C. and Zygarlicke,~C J.: Mercury transformations in coal combustion flue gas, Fuel Process. Technol., 65–66, 289–310, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Ito,~S., Yokoyama,~T., and Asakura,~K.: Emissions of mercury and other trace elements from coal-fired power plants in Japan, Sci. Total Environ., 368, 397–402, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Lee,~C W., Serre,~S D., Zhao,~Y., Lee,~S J., and Hastings,~T W.: Mercury oxidation promoted by a~selective catalytic reduction catalyst under simulated powder river basin coal combustion conditions, J. Air Waste Manage., 58, 484–493, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Lee,~S J., Seo,~Y C., Jang,~H N., Park,~K S., Baek,~J I., An,~H S., and Song,~K C.: Speciation and mass distribution of mercury in a~bituminous coal-fired power plant, Atmos. Environ., 40, 2215–2224, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Liu,~S., Yan,~N., Liu,~Z., and Qu,~Z.: Using bromine gas to enhance mercury removal from flue gas of coal-fired power plants, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41(4), 1405–1412, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Meij,~R., Vredendregt,~L H J., and Winkel,~H.: The fate and behavior of mercury in coal-fired power plants, J. Air Waste Manage., 52, 912–917, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Niksa,~S. and Fujiwara,~N.: Predicting Complete \chemHg Speciation Along Coal-Fired Utility Exhaust Systems. Presented at the Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium, Washington, DC, 30 August–2 September 2004, online available at: www.awma.org/onlinelibrary, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Pacyna,~E G., Pacyna,~J M., Steenhuisen,~F., and Wilson,~S.: Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000, Atmos. Environ., 40(22), 4048–4063, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Park,~K S., Seo,~Y C., Lee,~S J., and Lee,~J.: Emission and speciation of mercury from various combustion sources, Powder Technol., 180, 151–156, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Pavlish,~J H., Sondreal,~E A., Mann,~M D., Olson,~E S., Galbreath,~K C., Laudal,~D L., and Benson,~S A.: Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants, Fuel Process. Technol., 82(2–3), 89–165, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Pirrone, N., Cinnirella, S., Feng, X., Finkelman, R. B., Friedli, H. R., Leaner, J., Mason, R., Mukherjee, A. B., Stracher, G., Streets, D. G., and Telmer, K.: Global Mercury Emissions to the Atmosphere from Natural and Anthropogenic Sources, in: Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Emissions, Measurements and Models, edited by: Mason, R. and Pirrone, N., Springer USA, 1–47, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-93958-2, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Ren,~D., Zhao,~F., Dai,~S., Zhang,~J., and Luo,~K.: Geochemistry of Trace Elements in Coal, Science Press, Beijing, 2006 (in Chinese). </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Srivastava,~R K., Hutson~N., Martin~B., Princiotta~F., and Staudt,~J.: Control of mercury emissions from coal-fired electric utility boilers: an overview of the status of mercury control technologies, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(5), 1385–1393, doi:10.1021/es062639u, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Streets,~D G., Zhang,~Q., and Wu,~Y.: Projections of global mercury emissions in 2050, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43(8), 2983–2988, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Tang,~S., Feng,~X., Qiu,~J., Yin,~G., and Yang,~Z.: Mercury speciation and emissions from coal combustion in Guiyang, Southwest China, Environ. Res., 105(2), 175–182, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> US EPA: Mercury study report to congress, Vol. VIII, EPA-452/R-97-010, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> US EPA: Control of mercury emissions from coal-fired electric utility boilers, EPA-600/R-01-109, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 2002a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> US Environmental Protection Agency: ICR data, online available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/combust/utiltox/icrdata.xls, 2002b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> US Geological Survey (USGS), Mercury content in coal mines in China, unpublished data, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Wu,~Y., Wang,~S., Streets,~D G., Hao,~J., Chan,~M., and Jiang,~J.: Trends in anthropogenic mercury emissions in china from 1995 to 2003, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(17), 5312–5318, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Wu,~Y., Streets,~D G., Wang,~S., and Hao,~J.: Uncertainties in estimating mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., in press, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Yang,~X., Duan,~Y., Jiang,~Y., and Yang,~L.: Research on mercury form distribution in flue gas and fly ash of coal-fired boiler, Coal Sci. Technol., 35(12), 55–58, 2007 (in Chinese with abstract in English). </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Yokoyama T, Kazuo,~U., Matsuda,~A H., Ito,~S., and Noda,~N.: Mercury emissions from a~coal-fired power plant in Japan, Sci. Total Environ., 259, 97–103, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Zhang,~L., Zhuo,~Y., Chen,~L., Xu,~X., and Chen,~C.: Mercury emissions from six coal-fired power plants in China, Fuel Process. Technol., 89(11), 1033–1040, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Zhao,~Y., Wang,~S., Duan,~L., Lei,~Y., Cao,~P., and Hao,~J.: Primary air pollutant emissions of coal-fired power plants in China: current status and future prediction, Atmos. Environ., 42(36), 8442–8452, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Zheng,~L., Liu,~G., Qi,~C., Chen,~Y., and Zhang,~Y.: Study on environmental geochemistry of mercury in Chinese coals, J. Univ. Sci. Technol. B., 37(8), 953–963, 2007a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Zheng,~L., Liu,~G., and Zhou,~C.: The distribution, occurrence and environmental effect of mercury in Chinese coals, Sci. Total Environ., 384, 374–383, 2007b. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

