<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>9</volume_number>
		<issue_number>6</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-9-23565-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/23565/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/23565/2009/acpd-9-23565-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/23565/2009/acpd-9-23565-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>23565</start_page>
	<end_page>23588</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-11-05</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Uncertainties in estimating mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>Y. Wu</name>
			<email>ywu@tsinghua.edu.cn</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>D. G. Streets</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. X. Wang</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. M. Hao</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, and State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment  Simulation and Pollution Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Decision and Information Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439,  USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">A detailed multiple-year inventory of mercury emissions from anthropogenic activities in
      China has been developed. Coal combustion and nonferrous metals production continue to be
      the two leading mercury sources in China, together contributing ~80% of total
      mercury emissions. Within our inventory, a new comprehensive sub-module for estimation of
      mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China is constructed for uncertainty
      case-study. The new sub-module integrates up-to-date information regarding mercury content
      in coal by province, coal washing and cleaning, coal consumption by province, mercury
      removal efficiencies by control technology or technology combinations, etc. Based on these
      detailed data, probability-based distribution functions are built into the sub-module to
      address the uncertainties of these key parameters. The sub-module incorporates Monte Carlo
      simulations to take into account the probability distributions of key input parameters and
      produce the mercury emission results in the form of a statistical distribution. For example,
      the best estimate for total mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China in 2003
      is 90.5 Mg, with the uncertainty range from 57.1 Mg (P10) to
      154.6 Mg (P90); and the best estimate for elemental mercury emissions is
      43.0 Mg, with the uncertainty range from 25.6 Mg (P10) to 75.7 Mg
      (P90). The results further indicate that the majority of the uncertainty in mercury emission
      estimation comes from two factors: mercury content in coal and mercury removal efficiency.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> China Power Industry: 2004 China Power Yearbook, China Power Press, Beijing, China, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Banic,~C M., Beauchamp,~S T., Tordon,~R J., Schroeder,~W H., Steffen,~A., Anlauf,~K A., and Wong,~H K T.: Vertical distribution of gaseous elemental mercury in Canada,~J. Geophys. Res., 108 (D9), 4264, doi:10.1029/2002JD002116, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Chen,~L., Duan,~Y., Zhuo,~Y., Yang,~L., Zhang,~L., Yang,~X., Yao,~Q., Jiang, ~Y., and Xu,~X.: Mercury transformation across particulate control devices in six power plants of China: The co-effect of chlorine and ash composition, Fuel, 86(4), 603–610, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Dastoor,~A P. and Larocque,~Y.: Global circulation of atmospheric mercury: a~modeling study, Atmos. Environ., 38, 147–161, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Jaffe,~D., Prestbo,~E., Swartzendruber,~P., Weiss-Penzias, P., Kato,~S., Takami, ~A., Hatakeyama,~S., and Kajii,~Y.: Export of atmospheric mercury from Asia, Atmos. Environ., 39, 3029–3038, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Fang,~F., Wang,~Q., Liu,~R., Ma,~Z., and Hao,~Q.: Atmospheric particulate mercury in Changchun City, China. Atmos. Environ. 35, 4265–4272, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Feng,~X., Tang,~S., Shang,~L., Yan,~H., Sommar,~J., and Lindqvist,~O.: Total gaseous mercury in the atmosphere of Guiyang, PR China, Sci. Total Environ. 304, 61–72, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Feng,~X., Shang,~L., Wang,~S., Tang,~S., and Zheng,~W.: Temporal variation of total gaseous mercury in the air of Guiyang, China J. Geophys. Res., 109, D03303, doi:10.1029/2003JD004159, 2004a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Feng,~X., Yan,~H., Wang,~S., Qiu,~G., Tang,~S., Shang,~L., Dai,~Q., and Hou,~Y.: Seasonal variation of gaseous mercury exchange rate between air and water surface over Baihua reservoir, Guizhou, China. Atmos. Environ., 38, 4721–4732, 2004b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Feng,~X.: Mercury pollution in China – an overview, in: Dynamics of Mercury Pollution on Regional and Global Scales: Atmospheric Processes, Human Exposure Around the World, edited by: Pirrone,~N. and Mahaffey,~K., Springer Publishers, Norwell, 657–678, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Friedli,~H R., Radke,~L F., Prescott,~R., Li,~P., Woo,~J.-H., and Carmichael,~G R.: Mercury in the atmosphere around Japan, Korea, and China as observed during the 2001 ACE-Asia field campaign: measurements, distributions, sources, and implications,~J. Geophys. Res., 109, D19S25, doi:10.1029/2003JD004244, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Huang,~W. and Yang,~Y.: Mercury in coal in China, Coal Geol. China, 14(S), 37–40, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Liu,~S., Nadim,~F., Perkins,~C., Carley,~R J., Hoag,~G E., Lin,~Y., and Chen, ~L.: Atmospheric mercury monitoring survey in Beijing, China Chemosph., 48, 97–107, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> National Bureau of Statistics of China, P.R. China: China Energy Statistical Yearbook (2003), China Statistics Press, Beijing, China, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Ni,~J., Feng,~X., and Hong,~Y.: The concentrations of trace elements in coal in Guizhou province, Environ. Chem., 17(4), 339–344, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Pacyna,~J M., and Pacyna,~E G.: Global emissions of mercury to the atmosphere. Emissions from anthropogenic sources; Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP): Oslo, Norway, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Pacyna,~E G., and Pacyna,~J M.: Global emission of mercury from anthropogenic sources in 1995, Water Air Soil Pollut., 137, 149–165, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Pacyna,~E G., Pacyna,~J M., Steenhuisen,~F., and Wilson,~S.: Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4048–4063, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Pan,~L., Woo,~J.-H., Carmichael,~G R., Tang,~Y., Friedli,~H R., and Radke,~L F.: Regional distribution and emissions of mercury in east Asia: A~modeling analysis of Asian Pacific Regional Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE-Asia) observations,~J. Geophys. Res., 111, D07109, doi:10.1029/2005JD006381, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Seigneur,~C., Karamchandani,~P., Lohman,~K., Vijayaraghavan,~K., and Shia, ~R.-L.: Multiscale modeling of the atmospheric fate and transport of mercury, ~J. Geophys. Res., 106 (D21), 27795–27809, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Seigneur,~C., Vijayaraghavan,~K., Lohman,~K., Karamchandani,~P., and Scott,~C.: Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(2), 555–569, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Steding,~D J. and Flegal,~A R.: Mercury concentrations in coastal California precipitation: evidence of local and trans-Pacific fluxes of mercury to North America,~J. Geophys. Res., 107(D24), 4764, doi:10.1029/2002JD002081, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Selin,~N E., Jacob,~D J., Park~R J., Yantosca,~R M., Strode,~S., Jaegle,~L., and Jaffe,~D.: Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury: global constraints from observations,~J. Geophys. Res., 112, D02308, doi:10.1029/2006JD007450, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Srivastava,~R K., Hutson,~N., Martin,~B., and Princiotta,~F.: Control of mercury emissions from coal-fired electric utility boilers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40 (5), 1385–1393, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Streets,~D G., Bond,~T C., Carmichael,~G R., Fernandes,~S D., Fu,~Q., He, ~D., Klimont,~Z., Nelson,~S M., Tsai,~N Y., Wang,~M Q., Woo,~J.-H., and Yarber, ~K F.: An inventory of gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in Asia in the year 2000, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D21), 8809, doi:10.1029/2002JD003093, 2003a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Streets,~D G., Yarber,~K F., Woo,~J.-H., and Carmichael,~G R.: Biomass burning in Asia: Annual and seasonal estimates and atmospheric emissions, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 17(4), 1099, doi:10.1029/2003GB002040, 2003b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Streets,~D G., Hao,~J M., Wu,~Y., Jiang,~J K., Chan,~M., Tian,~H Z., and Feng,~X B.: Anthropogenic mercury emissions in China, Atmos. Environ., 39: 7789–7806, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Streets,~D G., Hao,~J., Wang,~S., and Wu,~Y.: Mercury emissions from coal combustion in China, in Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Measurements, Models and Policy Implications, edited by: Pirrone,~N. and Mason,~R., United Nations Environment Programme, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Subramanyan,~K., Wu,~Y., Diwekar,~U M., and Wang,~M Q.: New stochastic simulation capability applied to the GREET model, Int J. LCA., 13(3), 278–285, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Travnikov,~O. and Ryaboshapko,~A.: Modelling of Mercury Hemispheric Transport and Depositions. MSC-E Technical Report 6/2002. Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-East, Moscow, Russia, 67~pp., 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> US Geological Survey (USGS): Mercury content in coal mines in China (unpublished data), 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): Mercury Study Report to Congress, vol. II: An Inventory of Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions in the United States, EPA-452/R-97-004, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): Research and Development: Characterization and Management of Residues from Coal-fired Power Plants, EPA-600/R-02-083, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Weiss-Penzias,~P., Jaffe,~D., Swartzendruber,~P., Hafner,~W., Chand,~D., and Prestbo,~E.: Quantifying Asian and biomass burning sources of mercury using the Hg/CO ratio in pollution plumes observed at the Mount Bachelor observatory, Atmos. Environ., 41, 4366–4379, 2007 </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Wang,~Q., Shen,~W., and Ma,~Z.: Estimation of mercury emission from coal combustion in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 2711–2713, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Wang,~S X., Zhang,~L., Li,~G H., Wu,~Y., Hao,~J M., Pirrone,~N., Sprovieri, ~F., and Ancora,~M P.: Mercury emission and speciation of coal-fired power plants in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1–33, 2009a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Wang,~S X., Zhang,~L., Wu,~Y., Ancora,~M P., Zhao,~Y., and Hao,~J M.: Synergistic mercury removal by conventional pollutant control strategies for coal-fired power plants in China,~J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., in review, 2009b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text"> Wu,~Y., Wang,~S X., Streets,~D G., Hao,~J M., Chan,~M., and Jiang,~J K.: Trends in anthropogenic mercury emissions in China from 1995 to 2003, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 5312–5318, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="39" content_type="text"> Zhang,~J., Ren,~D., Xu,~D., and Zhao,~F.: Mercury in coal and its effect on environment, Adv. Environ. Sci., 7(3), 100–104, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="40" content_type="text"> Zhang,~L., Zhuo,~Y., Chen,~L., Xu,~X., and Chen,~C.: Mercury emissions from six coal-fired power plants in China, Fuel Process. Technol., 89(11), 1033–1040, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="41" content_type="text"> Zhou,~J., Zhang,~L., Luo,~Z., and Hu,~C.: Study on mercury emission and its control for boiler of 300 \unitMW unit, Thermal Power Generat., 37(4), 22–27, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="42" content_type="text"> Zhu,~Z., Xu,~L., and Tan,~Y.: Research on characteristics of mercury distribution in combustion products for a~300 \unitMW pulverized coal fired boiler, Power Eng., 22, 1594–1597, 2002. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

