Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 9, 22271-22330, 2009
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/22271/2009/
doi:10.5194/acpd-9-22271-2009
© Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Comparison of OMI NO2 tropospheric columns with an ensemble of global and European regional air quality models
V. Huijnen1, H. J. Eskes1, B. Amstrup2, R. Bergstrom3, K. F. Boersma1, H. Elbern4, J. Flemming5, G. Foret6, E. Friese4, A. Gross2, M. D'Isidoro7, I. Kioutsioukis8, A. Maurizi7, D. Melas8, V.-H. Peuch9, A. Poupkou8, L. Robertson3, M. Sofiev10, O. Stein11,12, A. Strunk4, A. Valdebenito13, C. Zerefos8, and D. Zyryanov6,14
1Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, The Netherlands
2Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
3Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrkoping, Sweden
4Rhenish Institute for Environmental Research at the University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
5European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), Reading, UK
6Laboratoire Interuniv. des Systèmes Atmosphériques, CNRS/Univ. Paris 12 et 7, Créteil, France
7Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bologna, Italy
8Laboratory of Climatology, Faculty of Geology, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
9CNRM-GAME, Météo-France and CNRS URA 1357, Toulouse, France
10Air Quality Research, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland
11Institute for Chemistry and Dynamics of the Geosphere (ICG), FZ Jülich, Germany
12Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
13Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Norway
14Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, CNRS/IPSL, Ecole polytechnique, Palaiseau, France

Abstract. We present model results for tropospheric NO2 from 9 regional models and 2 global models that are part of the GEMS-RAQ forecast system, for July 2008 to June 2009 over Europe. These modeled NO2 columns are compared with OMI NO2 satellite retrievals and surface observations from the Dutch Air Quality Network. The participating models apply principally the same emission inventory, but vary in model resolution (0.15 to 0.5°), chemical mechanism, meteorology and transport scheme. For area-averaged columns only a small bias is found when the averaging kernel is neglected in the comparison to OMI NO2 columns. The reason for this is that TM4 a priori profiles have higher NOx concentrations in the free troposphere (where sensitivity to NO2 is high) and higher NOx concentrations in the surface layers (where sensitivity to NO2 is low) than RAQ models, effectively cancelling the effect of applying the averaging kernel. We attribute these low NO2 concentrations in the RAQ models to missing emissions from aircraft and lightning. It is also shown that the NO2 concentrations from the upper part of the troposphere (higher than 500 hPa) contribute up to 20% of the total tropospheric NO2 signal observed by OMI. Compared to the global models the RAQ models show a better correlation to the OMI NO2 observations, which are characterized by high spatial variation due to the short lifetime for NO2. The spread in the modeled tropospheric NO2 column is on average 20–40%. In summer the mean of all models is on average 46% below the OMI observations, whereas in winter the models are more in line with OMI. On the other hand the models on average under-predict surface concentrations in winter by 24% and are more in line with observations in summer. These findings suggest that OMI tropospheric columns in summer over polluted regions are biased high by about 40%. The diurnal cycle and profiles in the regional models are well in line, and the profile shapes correspond well to results from the global models. The analyses against OMI observations have proven to be very useful to initiate model improvements, and to quantify uncertainties in the retrieval product.

Citation: Huijnen, V., Eskes, H. J., Amstrup, B., Bergstrom, R., Boersma, K. F., Elbern, H., Flemming, J., Foret, G., Friese, E., Gross, A., D'Isidoro, M., Kioutsioukis, I., Maurizi, A., Melas, D., Peuch, V.-H., Poupkou, A., Robertson, L., Sofiev, M., Stein, O., Strunk, A., Valdebenito, A., Zerefos, C., and Zyryanov, D.: Comparison of OMI NO2 tropospheric columns with an ensemble of global and European regional air quality models, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 9, 22271-22330, doi:10.5194/acpd-9-22271-2009, 2009.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    XML
    Citation
    Final Revised Paper
    Share