Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net 1680-7367 1680-7375 9 5 2009 10.5194/acpd-9-20599-2009 http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/20599/2009/ http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/20599/2009/acpd-9-20599-2009.html http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/20599/2009/acpd-9-20599-2009.pdf 20599 20630 2009-09-30 High resolution modeling of CO₂ over Europe: implications for representation errors of satellite retrievals D. Pillai kdhanya@bgc-jena.mpg.de C. Gerbig J. Marshall R. Ahmadov R. Kretschmer T. Koch U. Karstens Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, P.O. Box 100164, 07701 Jena, Germany NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA Satellite retrievals for column CO₂ with better spatial and temporal sampling are expected to improve the current surface flux estimates of CO₂ via inverse techniques. However, the spatial scale mismatch between remotely sensed CO₂ and current generation inverse models can induce representation errors, which can cause systematic biases in flux estimates. This study is focused on estimating these representation errors associated with utilization of satellite measurements in global models with a horizontal resolution of about 1 degree or less. For this we used simulated CO₂ from the high resolution modeling framework WRF-VPRM, which links CO₂ fluxes from a diagnostic biosphere model to a weather forecasting model at 10×10 km² horizontal resolution. Sub-grid variability of column averaged CO₂, i.e. the variability not resolved by global models, reached up to 1.2 ppm. Statistical analysis of the simulation results indicate that orography plays an important role. Using sub-grid variability of orography and CO₂ fluxes as well as resolved mixing ratio of CO₂, a linear model can be formulated that could explain about 50% of the spatial patterns in the bias component of representation error in column and near-surface CO₂ during day- and night-times. These findings give hints for a parameterization of representation error which would allow for the representation error to taken into account in inverse models or data assimilation systems. Ahmadov, R., Gerbig, C., Kretschmer, R., Koerner, S., Neininger, B., Dolman, A. J., and Sarrat, C.: Mesoscale covariance of transport and CO₂ fluxes: Evidence from observations and simulations using the WRF-VPRM coupled atmosphere-biosphere model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D22107, doi:22110.21029/22007JD008552, 2007. Alkhaled, A. A., Michalak, A. M., and Kawa, S. R.: Using CO₂ spatial variability to quantify representation errors of satellite CO₂ retrievals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L16813, doi:10.1029/2008GL034528, 2008. Chevillard, A., Karstens, U., Ciais, P., Lafont, S., and Heimann, M.: Simulation of atmospheric CO₂ over Europe and western Siberia using the regional scale model REMO, Tellus B, 54B, 872–894, 2002. Corbin, K. D., Denning, A. S., Lu, L., Wang, J.-W., and Baker, I. T.: Possible representation errors in inversions of satellite CO₂ retrievals, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D02301, doi:10.1029/2007JD008716, 2008. Crisp, D., Atlas, R. M., Breon, F.-M., Brown, L. R., Burrows, J. P., Ciais, P., Connor, B. J., Doney, S. C., Fung, I. Y., Jacob, D. J., Miller, C. E., O'Brien, D., Pawson, S., Randerson, J. T., Rayner, P., Salawitch, R. J., Sander, S. P., Sen, B., Stephens, G. L., Tans, P. P., Toon, G. C., Wennberg, P. O., Wofsy, S. C., Yung, Y. L., Kuang, Z., Chudasama, B., Sprague, G., Weiss, B., Pollock, R., Kenyon, D., and Schroll, S.: The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) mission, Adv. Space Res., 34, 700–709, 2004. ESA: European Space Agency Mission Assessment Reports-ASCOPE, online available at: http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/SP1313-1_ASCOPE.pdf, 2008. Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., Bala, G., John, J., Jones, C., Joos, F., Kato, T., Kawamiya, M., Knorr, W., Lindsay, K., Matthews, H. D., Raddatz, T., Rayner, P., Reick, C., Roeckner, E., Schnitzler, K.-G., Schnur, R., Strassmann, K., Weaver, A. J., Yoshikawa, C., and Zeng, N.: Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C$^4$MIP model intercomparison, J. Climate, 19, 3337–3353, 2006. Galmarini, S., Vinuesa, J.-F., and Martilli, A.: Modeling the impact of sub-grid scale emission variability on upper-air concentration, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 141–158, 2008. Gerbig, C., Lin, J. C., Wofsy, S. C., Daube, B. C., Andrews, A. E., Stephens, B. B., Bakwin, P. S., and Grainger, C. A.: Toward constraining regional-scale fluxes of CO₂ with atmospheric observations over a continent: 1. Observed spatial variability from airborne platforms, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4756, doi:4710.1029/2002JD003018, 2003. Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G., Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled online chemistry within the WRF model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, 2005. Gurney, K. R., Law, R. M., Denning, A. S., Rayner, P. J., Baker, D., Bousquet, P., Bruhwiler, L., Chen, Y.-H., Ciais, P., Fan, S. M., Fung, I. Y., Gloor, M., Heimann, M., Higuchi, K., John, J., Kowalczyk, E., Maki, T., Maksyutov, S., Peylin, P., Prather, M., Pak, B. C., Sarmiento, J., Taguchi, S., Takahashi, T., and Yuen, C.-W.: TransCom 3 CO₂ inversion intercomparison: 1. Annual mean control results and sensitivity to transport and prior flux information, Tellus B, 55, 555–579, 2003. Heimann, M., Körner, S., Tegen, I., and Werner, M.: The global atmospheric tracer model TM3. Technical Reports, Max-Planck-Institut für Biogeochemie, 5, 131~p., 2003. IPCC: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K., and Reisinger, A., IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 104~pp., 2007. Jung, M., Henkel, K., Herold, M., and Churkina, G.: Exploiting synergies of global land cover products for carbon cycle modeling, Remote Sens. Environ., 101, 534–553, 2006. Law, R. M., Peters, W., Rödenbeck, C., Aulagnier, C., Baker, I., Bergmann, D. J., Bousquet, P., Brandt, J., Bruhwiler, L., Cameron-Smith, P. J., Christensen, J. H., Delage, F., Denning, A. S., Fan, S., Geels, C., Houweling, S., Imasu, R., Karstens, U., Kawa, S. R., Kleist, J., Krol, M. C., Lin, S.-J., Lokupitiya, R., Maki, T., Maksyutov, S., Niwa, Y., Onishi, R., Parazoo, N., Patra, P. K., Pieterse, G., Rivier, L., Satoh, M., Serrar, S., Taguchi, S., Takigawa, M., Vautard, R., Vermeulen, A. T., and Zhu, Z.: TransCom model simulations of hourly atmospheric CO₂: Experimental overview and diurnal cycle results for 2002, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB3009, doi:3010.1029/2007GB003050, 2008. Lin, J. C., Gerbig, C., Daube, B. C., Wofsy, S. C., Andrews, A. E., Vay, S. A., and Anderson, B. E.: An empirical analysis of the spatial variability of atmospheric CO₂: Implications for inverse analyses and space-borne sensors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L23104, doi:23110.21029/22004GL020957, 2004. Mahadevan, P., Wofsy, S. C., Matross, D. M., Xiao, X., Dunn, A. L., Lin, J. C., Gerbig, C., Munger, J. W., Chow, V. Y., and Gottlieb, E. W.: A satellite-based biosphere parameterization for net ecosystem CO₂ exchange: Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM), Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB2005, doi:2010.1029/2006GB002735, 2008. Miller, C. E., Crisp, D., DeCola, P. L., Olsen, S. C., Randerson, J. T., Michalak, A. M., Alkhaled, A., Rayner, P., Jacob, D. J., Suntharalingam, P., Jones, D. B. A., Denning, A. S., Nicholls, M. E., Doney, S. C., Pawson, S., Boesch, H., Connor, B. J., Fung, I. Y., O'Brien, D., Salawitch, R. J., Sander, S. P., Sen, B., Tans, P., Toon, G. C., Wennberg, P. O., Wofsy, S. C., Yung, Y. L., and Law, R. M.: Precision requirements for space-based XCO₂ data, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10314, doi:10.1029/2006JD007659, 2007. NIES: GOSAT: Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite, Tsukuba, Japan, 2006. Parazoo, N. C., Denning, A. S., Kawa, S. R., Corbin, K. D., Lokupitiya, R. S., and Baker, I. T.: Mechanisms for synoptic variations of atmospheric CO2 in North America, South America and Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7239–7254, 2008. Peters, W., Jacobson, A. R., Sweeney, C., Andrews, A. E., Conway, T. J., Masarie, K., Miller, J. B., Bruhwiler, L. M. P., Pétron, G., Hirsch, A. I., Worthy, D. E. J., van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Wennberg, P. O., Krol, M. C., and Tans, P. P.: An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 18925–18930, 2007. Rayner, P. J. and O'Brien, D. M.: The utility of remotely sensed CO2 concentration data in surface source inversions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 175–178, 2001. Rödenbeck, C., Houweling, S., Gloor, M., and Heimann, M.: CO₂ flux history 1982–2001 inferred from atmospheric data using a global inversion of atmospheric transport, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1919–1964, 2003. Takahashi, T., Sutherland, S. C., Sweeney, C., Poisson, A., Metzl, N., Tilbrook, B., Bates, N., Wanninkhof, R., Feely, R. A., Sabine, C., Olafsson, J., and Nojiri, Y.: Global sea-air CO₂ flux based on climatological surface ocean $p$CO₂, and seasonal biological and temperature effects, Deep-Sea Res. II, 49, 1601–1622, 2002. Tolk, L. F., Meesters, A. G. C. A., Dolman, A. J., and Peters, W.: Modelling representation errors of atmospheric CO₂ mixing ratios at a regional scale, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6587–6596, 2008. van der Molen, M. K. and Dolman, A. J.: Regional carbon fluxes and the effect of topography on the variability of atmospheric CO₂, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D01104, doi:01110.01029/02006JD007649, 2007.