Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 9, 19103-19157, 2009
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/19103/2009/
doi:10.5194/acpd-9-19103-2009
© Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Contributions from transport, solid fuel burning and cooking to primary organic aerosols in two UK cities
J. D. Allan1, P. I. Williams1, W. T. Morgan2, C. L. Martin2, M. J. Flynn2, J. Lee3, E. Nemitz4, G. J. Phillips4, M. W. Gallagher2, and H. Coe2
1National Centre for Atmospheric Science, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
2School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
3National Centre for Atmospheric Science, The University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
4Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0QB, UK

Abstract. Organic matter frequently represents the single largest fraction of fine particulates in urban environments and yet the exact contributions from different sources and processes remain uncertain, owing in part to its substantial chemical complexity. Positive Matrix Factorisation (PMF) has recently proved to be a powerful tool for the purposes of source attribution and profiling when applied to ambient organic aerosol data from the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS). Here we present PMF analysis applied to AMS data from UK cities for the first time. Three datasets are analysed, with the focus on objectivity and consistency. The data were collected in London during the Regent's Park and Tower Environmental Experiment (REPARTEE) intensives and Manchester. These occurred during the autumn and wintertime, such that the primary fraction would be prominent. Ambiguities associated with rotationality within sets of potential solutions are explored and the most appropriate solution sets selected based on comparisons with external data. In addition to secondary organic aerosols, three candidate sources of primary organic aerosol (POA) were identified according to mass spectral and diurnal profiles; traffic emissions, cooking and solid fuel burning. Traffic represented, on average, 40% of POA during colder conditions and exhibited a hydrocarbon-like mass spectrum similar to those previously reported. Cooking aerosols represented 34% of POA and through laboratory work, their profile was matched with that sampled from the heating of seed oils, rather than previously-published spectra derived from charbroiling. This suggests that in these locations, oil from frying may have contributed more to the particulate than the meat itself. Solid fuel aerosols represented 26% of POA during cold weather conditions but were not discernable during the first REPARTEE experiment, when conditions were warmer than the other campaigns. This factor showed features associated with biomass burning and occurred mainly at night. Grid-scale emission factors of the combustion aerosols suitable for use in chemical transport models were derived relative to CO and NOx. The traffic aerosols were found to be 14.4 μg m−3 ppm−1 relative to CO for Manchester and 28 μg m−3 ppm−1 relative to NOx for London. Solid fuel emissions were derived as 17.3 μg m−3 ppm−1 relative to CO for Manchester. These correspond to mass emission ratios of 0.012, 0.021 (as NO) and 0.014 respectively and are of a similar order to previously published estimates, derived from other regions or using other approaches.

Citation: Allan, J. D., Williams, P. I., Morgan, W. T., Martin, C. L., Flynn, M. J., Lee, J., Nemitz, E., Phillips, G. J., Gallagher, M. W., and Coe, H.: Contributions from transport, solid fuel burning and cooking to primary organic aerosols in two UK cities, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 9, 19103-19157, doi:10.5194/acpd-9-19103-2009, 2009.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
XML
Citation
Final Revised Paper
Share