<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>9</volume_number>
		<issue_number>3</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-9-12927-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/12927/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/12927/2009/acpd-9-12927-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/12927/2009/acpd-9-12927-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>12927</start_page>
	<end_page>12963</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-06-08</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Theoretical implication of reversals of the ozone weekend effect systematically observed in Japan</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Kannari</name>
			<email>kannari.akiyoshi@circus.ocn.ne.jp</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>T. Ohara</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Independent researcher, NIES visiting researcher, Tokyo, Japan</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba, Japan</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Systematic changes of the ozone weekend effect are found over broad areas of
Japan. These changes are characterized by (1) spatial reversals from a
weekend increase in the vicinity of huge precursor source areas to a weekend
decrease in the surrounding rural areas, and (2) temporal reversals from a
weekend increase under relatively unsuitable meteorological conditions for
ozone formation to a weekend decrease under relatively suitable conditions.
We developed a simple numerical advection-reaction model to explain the
relationship between the duration of advection and the supplied solar
energy, which causes the daily maximum ozone concentration to be lower near
the precursor source. Ozone isopleth diagrams for individual advection
durations (equivalent to the distance from the source) for a wide range of
initial precursor conditions show that both VOC-limited and NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;-limited
regimes exist for each advection duration, but the area of NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;-limited
regime becomes dominant as the advection duration increases because of the
increased exposure of the air mass to solar energy. For given initial VOC
and NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; concentrations, the area remote from the source becomes a
NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;-limited regime even if the precursor source area is in the VOC-limited
regime. The rate of reduction of weekend emissions of NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; is larger than
that of VOC, causing a weekend increase in a VOC-limited regime near the
source, but a weekend decrease in remote areas with a NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;-limited regime.
The boundary between these two ozone formation regimes depends on
meteorological conditions: when sunlight intensity and temperature are
relatively low, the change from a VOC-limited to a NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;-limited regime occurs
at a point more remote from the source than when they are relatively high,
which causes a prevailing ozone weekend increase over a wide geographical
area on days with lower ozone potential. Therefore, observations of ozone
weekend changes can be interpreted in light of the theoretical implications
of our model; they can be used for determination of ozone formation regimes,
which change in different locations and under different meteorological
conditions.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Altshuler, S. L., Arcado, T. D. and Lawson, P. K.: Weekday vs. weekend ambient ozone concentrations: Discussion and hypotheses with focus on Northern California, J. Air Waste Manage., 45, 967–972, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Beekmann, M. and Vautard, R.: A modelling study of photochemical regimes over Europe: robustness and variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 9, 1521–1560, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Blanchard, C. L. and Fairley, D.: Spatial mapping of VOC and NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;-limitation of ozone formation in central California, Atmos. Environ., 35, 3861–3873, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Brönnimann, S. and Neu, U.: Weekend-weekday differences of near-surface ozone concentrations in Switzerland for different meteorological conditions, Atmos. Environ., 31, 1127–1135, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Carmichael, G. R., Tang, Y., Kurata, G., et al.: Regional-scale chemical transport modeling in support of observations obtained during the TRACE-P experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D21), 8823, doi:10.1029/2002JD003117, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Carter, W. P. A., Winer, A. M., and Pitts Jr., J. N.: Effects of kinetic mechanisms and hydrocarbon composition on oxidant-precursor relations predicted by the EKMA isopleth technique, Atmos. Environ., 16, 113–120, 1982. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Cleveland, W. S., Graedel, T. E., Kleiner, B., and Warmer, J. L.: Sunday and workday variations in the photochemical air pollution in New Jersey and New York, Science, 186, 1037–1038, 1974. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Elkus, B. and Wilson, K. R.: Photochemical air pollution: weekend-weekday differences, Atmos. Environ., 11, 509–515, 1977. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Fujita, E. M., Stockwell, W. R., Campbell, D. E., Keislar, R. E., and Lawson, D. R.: Evolution of the magnitude and spatial extent of the weekend ozone effect in California&apos;s South Coast Air Basin, J. Air Waste Manage., 53, 802–815, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Gery, M. W., Whitten, G. Z., Killus, J. P., and Dodge, M. C.: A photochemical kinetics mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling, J. Geophys. Res, 94, 12925–12956, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Heuss, J. M., Kahlbaum, D. F., and Wolff, G. T.: Weekday/weekend ozone differences: what can we learn from them?, J. Air Waste Manage., 53, 772–788, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Jacob, D. J.: Introduction to atmospheric chemistry, Princeton University Press, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Jenkin, M. E. and Clemitshaw, K. C.: Ozone and other secondary photochemical pollutants: chemical processes governing their formation in the planetary boundary layer, Atmos. Environ., 34, 2499–2527, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Jiménez, P., Parra, R., Gassó, S., and Baldasano, J. M.: Modeling the ozone weekend effect in very complex terrains: a case study in the Northeastern Iberian Peninsula, Atmos. Environ., 39, 429–444, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Kannari, A.: An analysis of weekend effects on photochemical oxidant concentrations in the Kanto and Kansai regions, Part 1 Finding of two kinds of reversals on weekend effect, J. Jpn. Soc. Atmos. Environ., 41(4), 209–219, 2006a (in Japanese with English abstract). </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Kannari, A.: An analysis of weekend effects on photochemical oxidant concentrations in the Kanto and Kansai regions, Part 2 Verification of dynamically changing ozone formation regimes, J. Jpn. Soc. Atmos. Environ. 41(4), 220–233, (in Japanese with English abstract) 2006b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Kannari, A. and Ohara, T.: A mechanism of reversals on the ozone weekend effect, J. Jpn. Soc. Atmos. Environ., 44(2), 82–90 (in Japanese with English abstract), 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Kannari A., Tonooka, Y., Baba, T., and Murano, K.: Development of multiple-species 1 km$\times$1 km resolution hourly basis emissions inventory for Japan, Atmos. Environ., 41, 3428–3439, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Milford, J. B., Gao, D., Sillman, S., Blossey, P., and Russel, A. G.: Total reactive nitrogen (NO&lt;sub&gt;y&lt;/sub&gt;) as an indicator of the sensitivity of ozone to reductions in hydrocarbon and NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 99(D2), 3533–3542, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Murphy, J. G., Day, D. A., Cleary, P. A., Wooldridge, P. J., Millet, D. B., Goldstein, A. H., and Cohen, R. C.: The weekend effect within and downwind of Sacramento: Part 2. Observational evidence for chemical and dynamical contributions, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 6, 11971–12019, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Paschalidou, A. K. and Kassomenos, P. A.: Comparison of air pollutant concentrations between weekdays and weekends in Athens, Greece for various meteorological conditions, Environ. Technol., 25, 1241–1255, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Pun, B. K. and Seigneur, C.: Day-of-week behavior of atmospheric ozone in three U.S. cities, J. Air Waste Manage., 53, 789–801, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Sillman, S.: The relation between ozone, NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; and hydrocarbons in urban and polluted rural environments, Atmos. Environ., 33, 1821–1845, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Stephens, S., Madronich, S., Wu, F., Olson, J. B., Ramos, R., Retama, A., and Muñoz, R.: Weekly patterns of México City&apos;s surface concentrations of CO, NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;, PM$_10$ and O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; during 1986–2007, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5313–5325, 2008. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

