Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 9, 1235-1272, 2009
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/1235/2009/
doi:10.5194/acpd-9-1235-2009
© Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Contrasting atmospheric boundary layer chemistry of methylhydroperoxide (CH3OOH) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) above polar snow
M. M. Frey1,2, M. A. Hutterli1, G. Chen3, S. J. Sjostedt4, J. F. Burkhart2,6, D. K. Friel5, and R. C. Bales2
1British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
2School of Engineering, University of California, Merced, CA, USA
3NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA
4Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
5Department of Chemistry, Boston College, Boston, MA, USA
6Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Department of Atmospheric and Climate Science, Kjeller, Norway

Abstract. Atmospheric hydroperoxides (ROOH) were measured at Summit, Greenland (72.97° N, 38.77° W) in summer 2003 (SUM03) and spring 2004 (SUM04) and South Pole in December 2003 (SP03). The two dominant hydroperoxides were H2O2 and CH3OOH (from here on MHP) with average(±1σ) mixing ratios of 1448(±688) pptv, 204(±162) and 278(±67) for H2O2 and 578(±377) pptv, 139(±101) pptv and 138(±89) pptv for MHP, respectively. In early spring, MHP dominated the ROOH budget and showed night time maxima and daytime minima, out of phase with the diurnal cycle of H2O2, suggesting that the organic peroxide is controlled by photochemistry, while H2O2 is largely influenced by temperature driven exchange between the atmosphere and snow. Highly constrained photochemical box model runs yielded median ratios between modeled and observed MHP of 52%, 148% and 3% for SUM03, SUM04 and SP03, respectively. At Summit firn air measurements and model calculations suggest a daytime sink of MHP in the upper snow pack, which decreases in strength through the spring season into the summer. Up to 50% of the estimated sink rates of 1–5×1011 molecules m−3 s−1 equivalent to 24–96 pptv h−1 can be explained by photolysis and reaction with the OH radical in firn air and in the quasi-liquid layer on snow grains. Rapid processing of MHP in surface snow is expected to contribute significantly to a photochemical snow pack source of formaldehyde (CH2O). Conversely, summer levels of MHP at South Pole are inconsistent with the prevailing high NO concentrations, and cannot be explained currently by known photochemical precursors or transport, thus suggesting a missing source. Simultaneous measurements of H2O2, MHP and CH2O allow to constrain the NO background today and potentially also in the past using ice cores, although it seems less likely that MHP is preserved in firn and ice.

Citation: Frey, M. M., Hutterli, M. A., Chen, G., Sjostedt, S. J., Burkhart, J. F., Friel, D. K., and Bales, R. C.: Contrasting atmospheric boundary layer chemistry of methylhydroperoxide (CH3OOH) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) above polar snow, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 9, 1235-1272, doi:10.5194/acpd-9-1235-2009, 2009.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    XML
    Citation
    Final Revised Paper
    Share