<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>9</volume_number>
		<issue_number>3</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-9-12283-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/12283/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/12283/2009/acpd-9-12283-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/9/12283/2009/acpd-9-12283-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>12283</start_page>
	<end_page>12344</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-05-20</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Comparison of a global-climate model simulation to a cloud-system resolving model simulation for long-term thin stratocumulus clouds</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. S. Lee</name>
			<email>seoungl@umich.edu</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. E. Penner</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Wang</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">A case of thin, warm marine-boundary-layer (MBL) clouds is simulated by a
cloud-system resolving model (CSRM) and is compared to the same case of
clouds simulated by a general circulation model (GCM). In this study, the
simulation by the CSRM adopts higher resolutions and more advanced
microphysics as compared to those by the GCM, enabling the CSRM-simulation to
act as a benchmark to assess the simulation by the GCM. Explicitly simulated
interactions among the surface latent heat (LH) fluxes, buoyancy fluxes, and
cloud-top entrainment lead to the deepening-warming decoupling and thereby
the transition from stratiform clouds to cumulus clouds in the CSRM. However,
in the simulation by the GCM, these interactions are not resolved and thus
the transition to cumulus clouds is not simulated. This leads to substantial
differences in cloud mass and radiation between simulations by the CSRM and
the GCM. When stratocumulus clouds are dominant prior to the transition to
cumulus clouds, interactions between supersaturation and cloud droplet number
concentration (CDNC) (controlling condensation) and those between rain
evaporation and cloud-base instability (controlling cloud dynamics and
thereby condensation) determine cloud mass and thus the radiation budget in
the simulation by the CSRM. These interactions result in smaller condensation
and thus smaller cloud mass and reflected solar radiation by clouds in the
simulation by the CSRM than in the simulation by the GCM where these
interactions are not resolved. The resolved interactions (associated with
condensation and the transition to cumulus clouds) lead to better agreement
between the CSRM-simulation and observation than that between the
GCM-simulation and observation.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Andres, R. J. and Kasgnoc, A. D.: A time-averaged inventory of subaerial volcanic sulfur emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 25 251–25 261, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation~2. Multiple aerosol types, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6837–6844, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation~3. Sectional representation, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4026, doi:10.1029/2001JD000483, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Beheng, K. D.: A parameterization of warm cloud microphysical conversion processes, Atmos. Res., 33, 193–206, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Bony, S. and Dufresne, J.-L.: Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L20806, doi:10.1029/2005GL023851, 2005 </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Boville, B. A., Rasch, P. J., Hack, J. J., and McCaa, J. R.: Representation of clouds and precipitation processes in the community atmosphere model version~3 (cam3), J. Climate, 19, 2184–2198, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Boucher, O. and Lohmann, U.: The sulfate-CCN-cloud albedo effect. A sensitivity study with two general circulation models, Tellus~B, 47, 281–300, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Bretherton, C. S. and Wyant, M. C.: Moisture transport, lower-tropospheric stability, and decoupling of cloud-topped boundary layers, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 148–167, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Chou, M.-D. and Kouvaris, L.: Calculations of transmission functions in the IR CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and O3 bands, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 9003–9012, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Chou, M.-D. and Suarez, M. J.: A shortwave radiation parameterization for atmospheric studies, NASA/TM, 15(104606), 40~pp., 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Chou, M.-D., W. Ridgway, W., and Yan, M.-H: Parameterizations for water vapor IR radiative transfer in both the middle and lower atmospheres, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 1159–1167, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Collins, W. D., Rasch, P. J., Boville, B. A., Hack, J. J., McCaa, J. R., Williamson, D. L., Briegleb, B. P., Bitz, C. M., Lin, S. J., and Zhang, M. H.: The formulation and atmospheric simulation of the community atmosphere model version 3 (cam3), J. Climate, 19, 2144–2161, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Cotton, W. R., Stephens, M. A., Nehrkorn, T., and Tripoli, G. J.: The Colorado State University three-dimensional cloud/mesoscale model. Part~II: An ice phase parameterization, Journal de Recherches Atmospheriques,16, 295–319, 1982. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Cubasch, U., Dai, X., Ding, Y., et al.: Climate change 2001: The scientific basis, in: Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, New York, 528–582, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Davis, A., Marshak, A., Wiscombe, W., and Cahalan, R. F.: Scale invariance of liquid water distribution in marine stratocumulus. Part~I: Spectral properties and stationary issues, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 1538–1558, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> de Roode, S. R., Duynkerke, P. G., and Jonker, H. J. J.: Large-eddy simulation: How large is large Enough?, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 403–421, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Donner, L. J., Seman, C. J., and Hemler, R. S.: Three-dimensional cloud-system modeling of GATE convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1885–1912, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Durand, P., Thoumieux, F., and Lambert, D.: Turbulent length scales in the marine atmospheric mixed layer, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 1889–1912, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Feingold, G., Cotton, W., Kreidenweis, S., and Davis, J.: The impact of giant cloud condensation nuclei on drizzle formation in stratocumulus: Implications for cloud radiative properties, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 4100–4117, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Feingold, G., Stevens, B., Cotton, W. R., and Frisch, A. S.: The relationship between drop in-cloud residence time and drizzle production in numerically simulated stratocumulus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 1108–1122, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Feingold, G., Tzivion, S., and Levin, Z.: Evolution of raindrop spectra. Part~I: Solution to the stochastic collection/breakup equation using the method of moments, J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 3387–3399, 1988. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Forster, P., Ramaswamy, V., Artaxo, P., et al.: Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing, in: Climate change 2007: the physical science basis, Contribution of working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., et al., Cambridge University Press, New York, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Ghan, S., Laulainen, N., Easter, R., Wagener, R., Nemesure, S., Chapman, E., Zhang, Y., and Leung, R.: Evaluation of aerosol direct radiative forcing in mirage, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 5295–5316, 2001 </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Ginoux, P., Chin, M., Tegen, I., Prospero, J. M., Holben, B., Dubovik, O., and Lin, S. J.: Sources and distributions of dust aerosols simulated with the gocart model, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 20 255–20 273, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Grabowski, W. W., Wu, X., and Moncrieff, M. W.: Cloud resolving modeling of tropical cloud systems during phase III of GATE. Part~I: Two-Dimensional Experiments, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 3684–3709, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Gong, S. L., Barrie, L. A., and Blanchet, J. P.: Modeling sea-salt aerosols in the atmosphere. 1 Model development, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 3805–3818, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Guo, H., Penner, J. E., Herzog, M., and Xie, S.: Investigation of the first and second aerosol indirect effects using data from the May 2003 Intensive Operational Period at the Southern Great Plains, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D15206, doi:10.1029/2006JD007173, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Hall, W.: A detailed microphysical model within a two-dimensional dynamic framework: Model description and preliminary results, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 2486–2507, 1980. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Hartmann, D. L., Ockert-Bell, M. E., and Michelsen, M. L.: The effect of cloud type on the earth&apos;s energy balance, J. Climate, 5, 1281–1304, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Herzog, M., Weisenstein, D. K., and Penner, J. E.: A dynamic aerosol module for global chemical transport models: Model description, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D18202, doi:10.1029/2003jd004405, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Ito, A. and Penner, J. E.: Historical emissions of carbonaceous aerosols from biomass and fossil fuel burning for the period 1870–2000, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB2028, doi:10.1029/2004GB002374, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Jiang, H., Feingold, G., and Cotton, W. R.: Simulations of aerosol-cloud-dynamical feedbacks resulting from entrainment of aerosol into the marine boundary layer during the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4813, doi:10.1029/2001JD001502, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Jonker, H. J. J., Duynkerke, P. G., and Cuijpers, J. W. M.: Energy spectra in the mesoscale range: An LES study, Preprints, 12th Symp. on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, Vancouver, BC, Canada, American Meteorological Society, 225––226, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Kettle, A. J. and Andreae, M. O.: Flux of dimethylsulfide from the oceans: A comparison of updated data seas and flux models, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 26 793–26 808, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Klemp, J. B. and Wilhelmson, R.: The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics, J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1070–1096, 1978. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Kratz, D. P., Chou, M.-D., Yan, M.-H., and Ho, C.-H.: Minor trace gas radiative forcing calculations using the k-distribution method with one-parameter scaling, J. Geophy. Res., 103, 31 647–31 656, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text"> Krueger, S. K., Cederwall, R. T., Xie, S. C., and Yio, J. J.: &apos;GCSS Working Group for Model Intercomparison – Procedures for Case~3: Summer 1997 ARM SCM IOP, Technical report obtainable from http://www.arm.gov/docs/scm/scmic3, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="39" content_type="text"> Lee, S. S, Penner, J. E., and Saleeby, S. M.: Aerosol effects on liquid-water path of thin stratocumulus clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D07204, doi:10.1029/2008JD010513, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="40" content_type="text"> Liu, X., Penner, J. E., and Herzog, M.: Global modeling of aerosol dynamics: Model description, evaluation, and interactions between sulfate and nonsulfate aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D18206, doi:10.1029/2004JD005674, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="41" content_type="text"> Liu, X., Penner, J. E., and Wang, M.: Influence of anthropogenic sulfate and black carbon on upper tropospheric clouds in the NCAR CAM3 model coupled to the IMPACT global aerosol model, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D03204, doi:10.1029/2008JD010492, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="42" content_type="text"> Long, A.: Solutions to the droplet collection equation for polynomial kernels, J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 1040–1052, 1974. </reference>
		<reference numeration="43" content_type="text"> Miura, H., Satoh, M., Nasuno, T., Noda, A. T., and Oouchi, K.: A Madden-Julian oscillation event realistically simulated by a global cloud-resolving model, Science, 318, 1763–1765, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="44" content_type="text"> Nicholls, S. and LeMone, M. A.: The fair weather boundary layer in GATE: The relation of subcloud fluxes and structure to the distribution and enhancement of cumulus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 37(9), 2051–2067, 1980. </reference>
		<reference numeration="45" content_type="text"> Nucciarone, J. J. and Young, G. S.: Aircraft measurements of turbulence spectra in the marine stratocumulus-topped boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 2382–2392, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="46" content_type="text"> Paluch, I. R. and Lenschow, D. H.: Stratiform cloud formation in the marine boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 2141–2158, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="47" content_type="text"> Penner, J. E., Andreae, M., Annegarn, H., Barrie, L., Feichter, J.,Hegg, D., Jayaraman, A., Leaitch, R., Murphy, D., Nganga, J., and Pitari, G.: Aerosols, their Direct and Indirect Effects, in: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, edited by: Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., Van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A., Report to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change from the Scientific Assessment Working Group (WGI), Cambridge University Press, 289–416, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="48" content_type="text"> Pruppacher, H. R. and Klett, J. D.: Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation, D Reidel, 714~pp., 1978. </reference>
		<reference numeration="49" content_type="text"> Ramaswamy, V., Boucher, O., Haigh, J., et al.: Radiative forcing of climate change, in: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, edited by: Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., et al., Cambridge University Press, New York, 349–416, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="50" content_type="text"> Rasch, P. J. and Kristjánsson, J. E.: A comparison of the CCM3 model climate using diagnosed and predicted condensate parameterizations, J. Climate, 11, 1587–1614, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="51" content_type="text"> Rogers, R. R. and Yau, M. K.: A short course in cloud physics, Pergamon Press, 293~pp., 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="52" content_type="text"> Rothermel, J. and Agee, E. M.: Aircraft investigation of mesoscale cellular convection during AMTEX~75, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 1027––1049, 1980. </reference>
		<reference numeration="53" content_type="text"> Saleeby, S. M. and Cotton, W. R.: A large-droplet mode and prognostic number concentration of cloud droplets in the Colorado state university regional atmospheric modeling system (RAMS). Part~I: Module description and supercell test simulations, J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 182–195, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="54" content_type="text"> Simpson, J. and Tao, W.-K.: The Goddard Cumulus Ensemble model. Part~II: Applications for studying cloud precipitating processes and for NASA TRMM, Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., 4, 73–116, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="55" content_type="text"> Smith, S. J., Pitcher, H., and Wigley, T. M. L.: Global and regional anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions, Global Planet. Change, 29, 99–119, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="56" content_type="text"> Smith, S., Andres, R., Conception, L., and Lurz, J.: Historical Sulfur Dioxide Emissions 1850–2000: Methods and Results, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA, 14537, 16, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="57" content_type="text"> Soong, S.-T. and Ogura, Y.: Response of trade wind cumuli to large-scale processes, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 2035–2050, 1980. </reference>
		<reference numeration="58" content_type="text"> Tao, W.-K, Simpson, J., Baker, D., et al.: Microphysics, radiation and surface processes in the Goddard Cumulus Ensemble (GCE) model, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 82, 97–137, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="59" content_type="text"> Tao, W.-K. and Simpson, J.: The Goddard Cumulus Ensemble model. Part~I: Model description, Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci., 4, 19–54, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="60" content_type="text"> Textor, C., Schulz, M., Guibert, S., Kinne, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S., Berntsen, T., Berglen, T., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichter, H., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Horowitz, L., Huang, P., Isaksen, I., Iversen, I., Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kirkev&amp;aring;g, A., Kristjansson, J. E., Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J. F., Liu, X., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, Ø., Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X.: Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1777–1813, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="61" content_type="text"> Tiedtke, M., Heckley, W. A., and Slingo, J.: Tropical forecasting at ECMWF: The influence of physical parameterization on the mean structure of forecasts and analyses, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 114, 639–644, 1988. </reference>
		<reference numeration="62" content_type="text"> Tompkins, A. M. and Craig, G. C.: Radiative-convective equilibrium in a three–dimensional cloud ensemble model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 2073–2098, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="63" content_type="text"> Tripoli, G. J. and Cotton, W. R.: A numerical investigation of several factors contributing to the observed variable intensity of deep convection over South Florida, J. Appl. Meteorol., 19, 1037–1063, 1980. </reference>
		<reference numeration="64" content_type="text"> Turner, D. D., Vogelmannb, A. M., Austinc, R. T., et al.: Thin liquid water clouds: Their importance and our challenge, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 177–190, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="65" content_type="text"> Twomey, S.: The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1149–1152, 1977. </reference>
		<reference numeration="66" content_type="text"> Twomey, S.: Computations of rain formation by coalescence, J. Atmos. Sci., 23, 405–411, 1966. </reference>
		<reference numeration="67" content_type="text"> Wang, M., Penner, J. E., and Liu, X.: Coupled IMPACT aerosol and NCAR CAM3 model: Evaluation of predicted aerosol number and size distribution, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D06302, doi:10.1029/2008JD010459, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="68" content_type="text"> Wang, M. and Penner, J. E.: Aerosol indirect forcing in a global model with particle nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 239–260, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="69" content_type="text"> Walko, R. L., Cotton, W. R., Meyers, M. P., and Harrington, J. Y.: New RAMS cloud microphysics parameterization: Part I The single-moment scheme, Atmos. Res., 38, 29–62, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="70" content_type="text"> Whitby, K. T.: The physical characteristics of sulfur aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 12, 135–159, 1978. </reference>
		<reference numeration="71" content_type="text"> Xiping, Z., Kumar, S., Eastman, J. L., et al.: Evaluating clouds in long-term cloud-resolving model simulations with observational data, J. Atmos. Sci., 64(12), 4153–4177, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="72" content_type="text"> Xu, K.-M., Cederwall, R. T., Donner, L. J., et al.: An intercomparison of cloud-resolving models with the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement summer 1997 Intensive Observation Period data, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 593–624, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="73" content_type="text"> Young, G. S.: Mixed layer spectra from aircraft measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 1251–1256, 1987. </reference>
		<reference numeration="74" content_type="text"> Zhang, M., Lin, W., Bretherton, C. S., Hack, J. J., and Phillip, J. R.: A modified formulation of fractional stratiform condensation rate in the NCAR Community Atmospheric Model (CAM2), J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4035, doi:10.1029/2002JD002523, 2003. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

