Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 8, 8243-8271, 2008
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/8243/2008/
doi:10.5194/acpd-8-8243-2008
© Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Validation of OMI tropospheric NO2 column data using MAX-DOAS measurements deep inside the North China Plain in June 2006
H. Irie1, Y. Kanaya1, H. Akimoto1, H. Tanimoto2, Z. Wang3, J. F. Gleason4, and E. J. Bucsela5
1Frontier Research Center for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, 3173-25 Showa-machi, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0001, Japan
2National Inst. for Environmental Studies, 16-2, Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
3LAPC/NZC, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China
4Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771-0000, USA
5SRI International, Menlo Park, CA 94107, USA

Abstract. A challenge for the quantitative analysis of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2) column data from satellite observations is posed mainly by the lack of satellite-independent observations for validation. We performed such observations of the tropospheric NO2 column using the ground-based Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) technique in the North China Plain (NCP) from 29 May to 29 June 2006. Comparisons between tropospheric NO2 columns measured by MAX-DOAS and the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) onboard the Aura satellite indicate that OMI data (the standard product, version 3) over NCP may have a positive bias of 1.6×1015 molecules cm−2 (20%), where the estimated random error in the OMI data is 0.6×1015 molecules cm−2 or approximately 8%. Combining these results with literature validation results for the US, Europe, and Pacific Ocean suggests that a bias of +20%/–30% is a reasonable estimate, accounting for different regions. Considering the uncertainty estimated here will pave the way for quantitative studies using OMI NO2 data, especially over NCP.

Citation: Irie, H., Kanaya, Y., Akimoto, H., Tanimoto, H., Wang, Z., Gleason, J. F., and Bucsela, E. J.: Validation of OMI tropospheric NO2 column data using MAX-DOAS measurements deep inside the North China Plain in June 2006, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 8, 8243-8271, doi:10.5194/acpd-8-8243-2008, 2008.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    XML
    Citation
    Final Revised Paper
    Share