Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 8, 6379-6407, 2008
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/6379/2008/
doi:10.5194/acpd-8-6379-2008
© Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
How small is a small cloud?
I. Koren1, L. Oreopoulos2,3, G. Feingold4, L. A. Remer3, and O. Altaratz1
1Department of Environmental Sciences Weizmann Institute, Rehovot 76100, Israel
2Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA
3Laboratory for Atmospheres, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
4NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA

Abstract. The interplay between clouds and aerosols and their contribution to the radiation budget is one of the largest uncertainties of climate change. Most work to date has separated cloudy and cloud-free areas in order to evaluate the individual radiative forcing of aerosols, clouds, and aerosol effects on clouds.

Here we examine the size distribution and the optical properties of small, sparse cumulus clouds and the associated optical properties of what is considered a cloud-free atmosphere within the cloud field. We show that any separation between clouds and cloud free atmosphere will incur errors in the calculated radiative forcing.

The nature of small cumulus cloud size distributions suggests that at any resolution, a significant fraction of the clouds are missed, and their optical properties are relegated to the apparent cloud-free optical properties. At the same time, the cloudy portion incorporates significant contribution from non-cloudy pixels.

We show that the largest contribution to the total cloud reflectance comes from the smallest clouds and that the spatial resolution changes the apparent energy flux of a broken cloudy scene. When changing the resolution from 30 m to 1 km (Landsat to MODIS) the average "cloud-free" reflectance at 1.65 μm increases more than 25%, the cloud reflectance decreases by half, and the cloud coverage doubles, resulting in an important impact on climate forcing estimations. The apparent aerosol forcing is on the order of 0.5 to 1 Wm−2 per cloud field.


Citation: Koren, I., Oreopoulos, L., Feingold, G., Remer, L. A., and Altaratz, O.: How small is a small cloud?, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 8, 6379-6407, doi:10.5194/acpd-8-6379-2008, 2008.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    XML
    Citation
    Final Revised Paper
    Share