<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>8</volume_number>
		<issue_number>2</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-8-5091-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/5091/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/5091/2008/acpd-8-5091-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/5091/2008/acpd-8-5091-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>5091</start_page>
	<end_page>5135</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-03-07</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Radiative forcing from particle emissions by future supersonic aircraft</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>G. Pitari</name>
			<email>gianni.pitari@aquila.infn.it</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. Iachetti</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>E. Mancini</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>V. Montanaro</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="2">
			<name>C. Marizy</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="3">
			<name>O. Dessens</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="3">
			<name>H. Rogers</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="3">
			<name>J. Pyle</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="4">
			<name>V. Grewe</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="4">
			<name>A. Stenke</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="5">
			<name>O. A. Søvde</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Dipartimento di Fisica, Università L&apos;Aquila, Italy</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">AIRBUS, Toulouse, France</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, 82230 Wessling, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Department of Geoscience, University of Oslo, Norway</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">In this work we focus on the direct radiative forcing (RF) of black carbon (BC) and sulphuric acid
particles emitted by future supersonic aircraft, as well as on the ozone RF due to changes produced by
emissions of both gas species (NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;, H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O) and aerosol particles capable of affecting stratospheric
ozone chemistry. Heterogeneous chemical reactions on the surface of sulphuric acid stratospheric particles (SSA-SAD)
are the main link between ozone chemistry and supersonic aircraft emissions of sulphur precursors (SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;)
and particles (H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O-H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;SO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;). Photochemical O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; changes are compared from four independent 3-D atmosphere-chemistry
models (ACMs), using as input the perturbation of SSA-SAD calculated in the University of L&apos;Aquila model, which includes
on-line a microphysics code for aerosol formation and growth. The ACMs in this study use aircraft emission scenarios
for the year 2050 developed by AIRBUS as a part of the EU project SCENIC, assessing options for fleet size, engine
technology (NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; emission index), Mach number, range and cruising altitude. From our baseline modelling simulation,
the impact of supersonic aircraft on sulphuric acid aerosol and BC mass burdens is 53 and 1.5 μg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, respectively,
with a direct RF of &amp;minus;11.4 and 4.6 mW/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; (net RF=&amp;minus;6.8 mW/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;).
This paper discusses the similarities and differences amongst the participating models in terms of O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; precursors
changes due to aircraft emissions (NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;, HO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;,Cl&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;,Br&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;) and stratospheric ozone sensitivity to them. In the
baseline case, the calculated global ozone change is &amp;minus;0.4&amp;plusmn;0.3 DU, with a net radiative forcing (IR+UV) of  &amp;minus;2.5&amp;plusmn;2 mW/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;.
The fraction of this O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;-RF attributable to SSA-SAD changes is, however, highly variable among the models, depending on the NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; removal
efficiency from the aircraft emission regions by large scale transport.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Andrews, D. G., Holton, J. R., and Leovy, C. B.: Middle atmosphere Dynamics, Academic Press, 490 pp., 1987. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Berntsen, T. and Isaksen, I. S. A.: A global 3-d chemical transport model for the troposphere, 1, model description and co and ozone results, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 21 239&amp;ndash;21 280, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Brunner, D., Staehelin, J., Rogers, H., Köhler, M., Pyle, J., Hauglustaine, D., Jourdain, L., Berntsen, T. K., Gauss, M., Meijer, I. I. E., van Velthoven, P., Pitari, G., Mancini, E., Grewe, V., and Sausen, R.: An evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models by comparison with research aircraft observations, Part~I: Concepts and overall model performance. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1609&amp;ndash;1631, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Brunner, D., Staehelin, J., Rogers, H., Köhler, M., Pyle, J., Hauglustaine, D., Jourdain, L., Berntsen, T. K., Gauss, M., Meijer, I. I. E., van Velthoven, P., Pitari, G., Mancini, E., Grewe, V., and Sausen, R.: An evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models, Part II: Detailed comparison with two selected campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 107&amp;ndash;129, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Chipperfield, M., Blom, C., Glatthor, N., Höpfner, M., Gulde, T., Piesch, C., and Simon, P.: Variability of clono 2 in the arctic polar vortex: Comparison of transall mipas measurements and 3d model results, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 9115&amp;ndash;9129, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Chipperfield, M., Santee, M., Froidevaux, L., Manney, G., Read, W., Waters, J., Roche, A., and Russell, J.: Analysis of uars data in the southern polar vortex in September 1992 using a chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 18 861&amp;ndash;18 881, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Chipperfield, M. and J. Pyle: Model sensitivity studies of arctic ozone depletion, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 28 389&amp;ndash;28 403, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Dameris, M., Grewe, V., Ponater, M., Deckert, R., Eyring, V., Mager, F., Matthes, S., Schnadt, C., Stenke, A., Steil, B., Brül, C., and Giorgetta, M. A.: Long-term changes and variability in a transient simulation witha chemistry-climate model employing realistic forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2121&amp;ndash;2145, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> ECMWF, 2004: IFS documentation CY28R1, The ECMWF Integrated Forecast System (IFS). </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Foster, P.M. F. and Shine, K. P.: Radiative forcing and temperature trends from stratospheric ozone changes, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 10 841&amp;ndash;10 857, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Gauss, M., Isaksen, I. S. A., Wong, S., and Wang, W.: Impact of H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O emissions from cryoplanes and kerosene aircraft on the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4304, doi:10.1029/2002JD002623, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Gauss, M, Isaksen, I. S. A., Lee, D. S., and S\o vde, O. A.: Impact of aircraft NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; emissions on the atmosphere &amp;ndash; tradeoffs to reduce the impact, Atmos. Chemi. Phys., 6, 1529&amp;ndash;1548, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Grewe, V., Dameris, M., Fichter, C., and Sausen, R.: Part 1: Interactively coupled climate-chemistry simulations and sensitivities to climate-chemistry feedback, lightning and model resolution, Meteorol. Z., 3, 177&amp;ndash;186, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Grewe, V., Stenke, A., Ponater, M., Sausen, R., Pitari, G., Iachetti, D., Rogers, H., Dessens, O., Pyle, J., Isaksen, I. S. A., Gulstad, L., S\o vde, O. A., Marizy, C., and Pascuillo, E.: Climate impact of supersonic air traffic: an approach to optimize a potential future supersonic fleet - results from the EU-project SCENIC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5129&amp;ndash;5145, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Hansen, J., Sato, M., and Ruedy, R.: Radiative forcing and climate response, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 6831&amp;ndash;6864, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Hein, R., Dameris, M., Schnadt, C., Land, C., Grewe, V., Köhler, Ponater, I. M., Sausen, R., Steil, B., Landgraf, J., and Brühl, C.: Results of an interactively coupled atmospheric chemistry - general circulation model: Comparison with observations, Ann. Geophysicae, 19, 435&amp;ndash;457, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Hesstvedt, E., Hov, O., and Isaksen, I.: Quasi steady-state approximation in air pollution modelling: Comparison of two numerical schemes for oxidant prediction, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., X, 971&amp;ndash;994, 1978. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Holtslag, A. A. M., DrBruijn, E. I. F., and Pan, H.-L.: A high resolution air mass transformation model for short-range weather forecasting, Mon. Weather Rev., 118, 1561&amp;ndash;1575, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Isaksen, I., Rognerud, B., Stordal, F., Coffey, M. T., and Mankin, W. G.: Studies of arctic stratospheric ozone in a 2-d model including some effects of zonal asymmetries, Geophys. Res. Lett., 17, 557&amp;ndash;560, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> IPCC, Special report on aviation and the global atmosphere, edited by: Penner, J. E., Lister, D. H., Griggs, D. J. et al., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 373 pp., 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> JPL, Chemical kinetics and photochemical data for use in stratospheric modelling, JPL publ. 97-4, Pasadena, California, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Kent, G. S. and McCormick, M. P.: SAGE and SAM II measurements of global stratospheric aerosol optical depth and mass loading, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 5303&amp;ndash;5314, 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Lacis, A. and Hansen, J. E.: A parameterization for the absorption of solar radiation in the Hearths atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 118&amp;ndash;133, 1974. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Lacis, A., Hansen, J., and Sato, M.: Climate forcing by stratospheric aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 1607&amp;ndash;1610, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Land, C., Feichter, J., and Sausen, R.: Impact of the vertical resolution on the transport of passive tracers in the echam4 model, Tellus B, 54, 344&amp;ndash;360, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> NASA, The atmospheric effects of stratospheric aircraft: A first program report, edited by: Prater, M. J. et al., NASA Ref. Publ. 1272, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> NASA, Model and Measurements intercomparison II, edited by: Park, J. H. et al., NASA/TM-1999-209554, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Pitari, G., Rizi, V., Ricciardulli, L., and Visconti, G.: High speed civil transport impact: role of sulphate, nitric and trihydrate, and ice aerosol studied with a two-dimensional model including aerosol physics, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 23 141&amp;ndash;23 164, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Pitari, G. and Mancini, E.: Climatic impact of future supersonic aircraft: role of water vapour and ozone feedback on circulation, Phys. Chem. Earth PT C, 26/8, 571&amp;ndash;576, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Pitari, G., Mancini, E., Bregman, A., Rogers, H. L., Sundet, J. K., Grewe, V., and Dessens, O.: Sulphate particles from subsonic aviation: Impact on upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric ozone, Phys. Chem. Earth PT C, 26/8, 563&amp;ndash;569, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Pitari, G., Mancini, E., Rizi, V., and Shindell, D. T.: Impact of future climate and emission changes on stratospheric aerosols and ozone. J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 414&amp;ndash;440, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Pitari, G., Mancini, E., Rogers, H. L., Dessens, O., Isaksen, I., and Rognerud, B.: A 3-D model intercomparison of the effects of future Supersonic aircraft on the chemical composition of the stratosphere, Proceedings of the 2003 AAC-Conference, Friedrichshafen, Germany, 166&amp;ndash;172, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Prather, M.: Numerical advection by conservation of second-order moments, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 6671&amp;ndash;6681, 1986. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Pyle, J., Chipperfield, M., Kilbane-Dawe, I., Lee, A., Stimpe, R., Kohn, D., Renger, W., and Waters, J.: Early modelling results from the sesame and ASHOE campaigns, Faraday Discuss., 100, 371&amp;ndash;387, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Ramanathan, V.: Radiative transfer within the Earths troposphere and stratosphere: A simplified radiative convective model, J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1330&amp;ndash;1346, 1976. </reference>
		<reference numeration="36" content_type="text"> Ramanathan, V., Pitcher, E. J., Malone, R. C., and Blackmon, M. L.: The response of a spectral general circulation model to refinements in radiative processes, J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 605&amp;ndash;630, 1983. </reference>
		<reference numeration="37" content_type="text"> Reithmeier, C. and Sausen, R.: ATTILA &amp;ndash; Atmospheric Tracer transport in a Lagrangian Model, Tellus B, 54(3), 278&amp;ndash;299, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="38" content_type="text"> Rogers, H. L., Chipperfield, M., Bekki, S., and Pyle, J.: The effects of future supersonic aircraft on stratospheric chemistry modelled with varying meteorology, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 29 359&amp;ndash;29 369, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="39" content_type="text"> Rogers, H. L., Teyssedre, H., Pitari, G., Grewe, V., van Velthoven, P., and Sundet, J.: Model intercomparison of the transport of aircraft-like emissions from sub- and supersonic aircraft, Meteorol. Z., 11, 151&amp;ndash;159, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="40" content_type="text"> Rummukainen, M., Isaksen, I., Rognerud, B., and Stordal, F.: A global model tool for three-dimensional multiyear stratospheric chemistry simulations: Model description and first results, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 26 437&amp;ndash;26 456, 1990. </reference>
		<reference numeration="41" content_type="text"> Rummukainen, M.: Modeling stratospheric chemistry in a global three-dimensional chemical transport model, sctm-1. Model development, Finnish Meteorological Institute Contributions, no 19, p. 206, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="42" content_type="text"> Sasamori, T.: The radiative cooling calculation for application to general circulation experiments, J. Appl. Meteorol., 7, 721&amp;ndash;729, 1968. </reference>
		<reference numeration="43" content_type="text"> SCENIC: Scenario of aircraft emissions and impact studies on chemistry and climate, EU contract EVK2-2001-00103 (2002&amp;ndash;2005), final report, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="44" content_type="text"> Steil, B., Dameris, M., Brühl, C., Crutzen, P., Grewe, V., Ponater, M., and Sausen, R.: Development of a chemistry module for GCMs: first results of a multiannual integration, Ann. Geophysicae, 16, 205&amp;ndash;228, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="45" content_type="text"> Stenke, A., Grewe, V., and Ponater, M.: Lagrangian transport of water vapor and cloud water in the ECHAM GCM and its impact on the cold bias, Clim. Dynam., doi:10.1007/S00382-007-0347-5, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="46" content_type="text"> Stenke, A., Grewe, V., and Pechtl, S.: Do supersonic aircraft avoid contrails?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 955&amp;ndash;967, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="47" content_type="text"> Stordal, F., Isaksen, I., and Horntvedt, K.: Adiabatic circulation two-dimensional model with photochemistry: Simulations of ozone and long-lived tracers with surface sources, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 5757&amp;ndash;5776, 1985. </reference>
		<reference numeration="48" content_type="text"> Sundet, J. K.: Model studies with a 3-d global CTM using ECMWF data, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo Norway, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="49" content_type="text"> Tiedtke, M. A.: Comprehensive mass UX scheme for cumulus parameterization on large scale models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779&amp;ndash;1800, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="50" content_type="text"> TRADEOFF: Tradeoff aircraft emissions: Contributions of various climate compounds to changes in composition and radiative forcing &amp;ndash; tradeoff to reduce atmospheric impact, EU-contract EVK2-CT-1999-0030 (2000&amp;ndash;2003), final report, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="51" content_type="text"> Vardavas, I. M. and Carver, J. H.: Solar and terrestrial parameterizations for radiative-convective models, Planet. Space Sci., 32, 1307&amp;ndash;1325, 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="52" content_type="text"> Weisenstein, D., Bekki, S., Pitari, G., Timreck, C., and Mills, M.: WCRP/SPARC scientific assessment of stratospheric aerosol properties; Chapter 6: Modeling of stratospheric aerosols, edited by: Thomason, L. and Peter, T., WCRP-124, WMO/TD-1295, SPARC report no. 4, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="53" content_type="text"> Williamson, D. L. and Rasch, P. J.: Water vapour transport in the NCAR CCM2, Tellus, 46A, 34&amp;ndash;51, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="54" content_type="text"> WMO: Atmospheric Ozone-1985, WMO- Global Ozone Res. Monit. Proj. Rep. 16, Vol.1, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1985.  </reference>
	</references>
</article>

