Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 8, 18621-18649, 2008
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/18621/2008/
doi:10.5194/acpd-8-18621-2008
© Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
What can we learn from European continuous atmospheric CO2 measurements to quantify regional fluxes – Part 2: Sensitivity of flux accuracy to inverse setup
C. Carouge1, P. Peylin1,2, P. J. Rayner1, P. Bousquet1,3, F. Chevallier1, and P. Ciais1
1Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CNRS-CEA-UVSQ, Bât. 701, Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
2Laboratoire de Biogéochimie et Ecologie des Milieux Continentaux, CNRS-UPMC-INRA, Paris, France
3Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Versailles, France

Abstract. An inverse model using atmospheric CO2 observations from a European network of stations to reconstruct daily CO2 fluxes and their uncertainties over Europe at 50 km resolution has been developed within a Bayesian framework. We use the pseudo-data or identical twin approach in which we try to recover known fluxes using a range of perturbations to the input. In this second part, the focus is put on the sensitivity of flux accuracy to the inverse setup, varying the prior flux errors, the pseudo-data errors and the network of stations. We show that, under a range of assumptions about prior error and data error we can recover fluxes reliably at the scale of 1000 km and 10 days. At smaller scales the performance is highly sensitive to details of the inverse set-up. The use of temporal correlations in the flux domain appears to be of the same importance as the spatial correlations. We also note that the use of simple, isotropic correlations on the prior flux errors is more reliable than the use of apparently physically-based errors. Finally, increasing the European atmospheric network density improves the area with significant error reduction in the flux retrieval.

Citation: Carouge, C., Peylin, P., Rayner, P. J., Bousquet, P., Chevallier, F., and Ciais, P.: What can we learn from European continuous atmospheric CO2 measurements to quantify regional fluxes – Part 2: Sensitivity of flux accuracy to inverse setup, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 8, 18621-18649, doi:10.5194/acpd-8-18621-2008, 2008.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    XML
    Citation
    Final Revised Paper
    Share