<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>8</volume_number>
		<issue_number>4</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-8-15997-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/15997/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/15997/2008/acpd-8-15997-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/15997/2008/acpd-8-15997-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>15997</start_page>
	<end_page>16025</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-08-21</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Ship emitted NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; in the Indian Ocean: comparison of model results with satellite data</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>K. Franke</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Richter</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>H. Bovensmann</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="2">
			<name>V. Eyring</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="3">
			<name>P. Jöckel</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. P. Burrows</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">University of Bremen, Institute for Environmental Physics, Bremen, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">An inventory of NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; emission from international shipping has been
evaluated by comparing NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; tropospheric columns derived from the
satellite instruments SCIAMACHY (January 2003 to February 2008), GOME
(January 1996 to June 2003), and GOME-2 (March 2007 to February 2008) to
NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; columns calculated with the atmospheric chemistry general
circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1 (January 2000 to October 2005).
The data set from SCIAMACHY yields the first  monthly analysis of ship
induced NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; enhancements in the Indian Ocean. For both data and model
consistently the tropospheric excess method was used to obtain mean NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;
columns over the shipping lane from India to Indonesia, and over two ship free
regions, the Bay of Bengal and the central Indian Ocean. In general, the model
simulates the differences between the regions affected by ship
pollution and ship free regions  reasonably well. Minor discrepancies between
model results and satellite data were identified during biomass burning seasons
in March to May over India and the Indochinese Peninsula and August to October
over Indonesia. We conclude that the NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; ship emission inventory used in
this study is a good approximation of NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; ship emissions in
the Indian Ocean for the years 2002 to 2007. It assumes that around
6 Tg(N) yr&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt; are emitted by international shipping globally,
resulting in 90 Gg(N) yr&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt; in the region of interest when using
Automated Mutual Assistance Vessel Rescue System (AMVER) or
72 Gg(N) yr&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt; when using
the International Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set (ICOADS) as spatial
proxy. The results do not support some previously published lower
ship emissions estimates of 3–4 Tg(N) yr&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt; globally, making this
study the first that evaluates atmospheric response to NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; ship
emission estimates from space.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Beirle, S., Platt, U., von Glasow, R., Wenig, M., and Wagner, T.: Estimate of nitrogen oxide emissions from shipping by satellite remote sensing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L18102, doi:10.1029/2004GL020312, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noël, S., Rozanov, V., Chance, K., and Goede, A.: SCIAMACHY: Mission Objectives and Measurement Modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Brewer, A., McElroy, C., and Kerr, J.: Nitrogen dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere, Nature, 246, 129–133, 1973. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Burrows, J., Hölzle, E., Goede, A., Visser, H., and Fricke, W.: SCIAMACHY–-scanning imaging absorption spectrometer for atmospheric chartography, Acta Astronaut., 35, 445–451, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Burrows, J., Weber, M., Buchwitz, M., et~al.: The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME): Mission Concept and First Scientific Results, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 151–175, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Callies, J., Corpaccioli, E., Eisinger, M., Hahne, A., and Lefebvre, A.: GOME-2- Metop&apos;s second-generation sensor for operational ozone monitoring, ESA Bull., 102, 28–36, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Corbett, J., Fischbeck, P., and Pandis, S.: Global nitrogen and sulfur inventories for oceangoing ships, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 3457–3470, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Corbett, J J. and Koehler, H W.: Updated emissions from ocean shipping, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4650, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Davis, D., Grodzinsky, G., Kasibhatla, P., Crawford, J., Chen, G., Liu, S., Bandy, A., Thornton, D., Guan, H., and Sandholm, S.: Impact of ship emissions on marine boundary layer NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; and SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; distributions over the Pacific basin, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 235–238, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Emmons, L., Hauglustaine, D., Mueller, J., Carroll, M., Brasseur, G., Brunner, D., Staehelin, J., Thouret, V., and Marenco, A.: Data composites of airborne observations of tropospheric ozone and its precursors, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 20 497–20 538, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Endresen, Ø., Sørg&amp;aring;rd, E., Sundet, J., Dalsøren, S., Isaksen, I., Berglen, T., and Gravir, G.: Emission from international sea transportation and environmental impact, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4560, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Eyring, V., Köhler, H W., van Aardenne, J., and Lauer, A.: Emissions from international shipping: 1. The last 50 years, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D17305, doi:10.1029/2004JD005619, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Eyring, V., Stevenson, D S., Lauer, A., Dentener, F J., Butler, T., Collins, W J., Ellingsen, K., Gauss, M., Hauglustaine, D A., Isaksen, I. S A., Lawrence, M G., Richter, A., Rodriguez, J M., Sanderson, M., Strahan, S E., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., van Noije, T. P C., and Wild, O.: Multi-model simulations of the impact of international shipping on Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate in 2000 and 2030, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 757–780, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Fearnleys: Fearnleys Review 2007, The Tanker and Bulk Markets and Fleets, Tech. Rep., Oslo, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Franke, K., Eyring, V., Sander, R., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., and Sausen, R.: Toward effective emissions of ships in global models, Meteorol. Z., 17, 117–129, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Brühl, C., Buchholz, J., Ganzeveld, L., Hoor, P., Kerkweg, A., Lawrence, M., Sander, R., Steil, B., Stiller, G., Tanarhte, M., Taraborrelli, D., van Aardenne, J., and Lelieveld, J.: The atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: consistent simulation of ozone from the surface to the mesosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5067–5104, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Kasibhatla, P., Levy, H., Moxim, W., Pandis, S., Corbett, J., Peterson, M., Honrath, R., Frost, G., Knapp, K., Parrish, D., and Ryerson, T.: Do emissions from ships have a significant impact on concentrations of nitrogen oxides in the marine boundary layer?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 2229–2232, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Kunhikrishnan, T. and Lawrence, M.: Sensitivity of NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; over the Indian Ocean to emissions from the surrounding continents and nonlinearities in atmospheric chemistry responses, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L15109, doi:10.1029/2004GL020210, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Lauer, A., Dameris, M., Richter, A., and Burrows, J P.: Tropospheric NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; columns: a comparison between model and retrieved data from GOME measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2, 67–78, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Lawrence, M. and Crutzen, P.: Influence of NO$_\mathrmx$ emissions from ships on tropospheric photochemistry and climate, Nature, 402, 167–170, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Noxon, J.: Nitrogen dioxide in the stratosphere and tropsphere as measured by ground-based absoption spectroscopy, Science, 189, 547–549, 1975. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Olivier, J. and Berdowsky, J.: Global emission sources and sinks, in: The Climate System, edited by: Berdowski, J., Guicherit, R., and Heij, B., 33–77, A. A. Balkema Publishers/Swets &amp; Zeitlinger Publishers, Lisse, The Netherlands, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Olivier, J. G J., van Aardenne, J A., Dentener, F., Ganzeveld, L., and Peters, J. A. H W.: Recent trends in global greenhouse gas emissions: regional trends and spatial distribution of key sources, in: Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases (NCGG-4), edited by: van Amstel, A., 325–330, Millpress, Rotterdam, ISBN 90 5966 043 9, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Platt, U., Perner, D., and Pätz, H.: Simultaneous measurement of atmospheric CH$2$O, O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;, and NO 2 by differential optical absorption, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 6329–6335, 1979. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Pozzer, A., Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Sander, R., Ganzeveld, L., Kerkweg, A., and Lelieveld, J.: Simulating organic species with the global atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: a comparison of model results with observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2527–2550, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Richter, A. and Burrows, J.: Tropospheric NO$_\mathrm2$ from GOME measurements, Adv. Space Res., 29, 1673–1683, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Richter, A., Eyring, V., Burrows, J., Bovensmann, H., Lauer, A., Sierk, B., and Crutzen, P.: Satellite measurements of NO$_\mathrm2$ from international shipping emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L23110, doi:10.1029/2004GL020822, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Song, C., Chen, G., Hanna, S., Crawford, J., and Davis, D.: Dispersion and chemical evolution of ship plumes in the marine boundary layer: Investigation of O$_\mathrm3$/NO$_\mathrmy$/HO$_\mathrmx$ chemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4143, doi:10.1029/2002JD002216, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Wang, C., Corbett, J., and Firestone, J.: Improving Spatial Representation of Global Ship Emissions Inventories, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 193–199, 2008. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

