Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net 1680-7367 1680-7375 8 4 2008 10.5194/acpd-8-13265-2008 http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/13265/2008/ http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/13265/2008/acpd-8-13265-2008.html http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/13265/2008/acpd-8-13265-2008.pdf 13265 13299 2008-07-14 Cosmic rays, CCN and clouds – a reassessment using MODIS data J. E. Kristjánsson j.e.kristjansson@geo.uio.no C. W. Stjern F. Stordal A. M. Fjǽraa G. Myhre K. Jónasson Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway Center for International Climate and Environmental Research, Oslo, Norway Department of Mathematics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland The response of clouds to sudden decreases in the flux of galactic cosmic rays (Forbush decrease events) has been investigated using cloud products from the space-borne MODIS instrument, which has been in operation since 2000. By focusing on pristine Southern Hemisphere ocean regions we examine areas which are particularly susceptible to changes in cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations, and where a cosmic ray signal should be easier to detect than elsewhere. While previous studies on the subject have mainly considered cloud cover, the high spatial and spectral resolution of MODIS allows for a more thorough study of microphysical parameters such as cloud droplet size, cloud water content and cloud optical depth, in addition to cloud cover. Averaging the results from the 13 Forbush decrease events that were considered, no systematic correlation was found between any of the four cloud parameters and galactic cosmic radiation, with a seemingly random distribution of positive and negative correlations. When only the three Forbush decrease events with the largest amplitude are studied, the correlations fit the hypothesis better, with 8 out of 12 correlations having the expected sign. Splitting the area of study into several sub-regions, one sub-region in the Atlantic Ocean showed statistically significant correlations compatible with a cosmic ray-induced enhancement of CCN and cloud droplet number concentrations. However, the lack of correlation in any of the other 5 sub-regions suggests that this may be a statistical co-incidence. Introducing a time lag of a few days for clouds to respond to the cosmic ray signal did not change the overall results. Singling out low clouds of intermediate optical depth with large susceptibility did not lead to higher correlations. In conclusion, no response to variations in cosmic rays associated with Forbush decrease events was found in marine low clouds in remote regions using MODIS data. Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, 1989. Cane, H. V.: Coronal mass ejections and Forbush decreases, Space Sci. Rev., 93, 55–77, 2000. Carslaw, K. S., Harrison, R. G., and Kirkby, J.: Cosmic rays, clouds and climate, Science, 298, 1732–1737, 2002. Damon, P. E. and Laut, P.: Pattern of strange errors plagues solar activity and terrestrial climate data, EOS, 85, 370–374, 2004. Eichkorn, S., Wilhelm, S., Aufmhoff, H., Wohlfrom, K. H., and Arnold, F.: Cosmic-ray induced aerosol formation: First observational evidence from aircraft-based ion mass spectrometer measurements in the upper troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1698, doi:10.1029/2002GL015044, 2002. Evan, A. T., Heidinger, A. K., and Vimont, D. J.: Arguments against a physical long-term trend in global ISCCP cloud amounts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L04701, doi:10.1029/2006GL028083, 2007. Ferek, R. J., Hegg, D. A., Hobbs, P. V., et al.: Measurements of ship-induced tracks in clouds off the Washington coast, J. Geophys. Res., 103, D18, 23 199–23 206, 1998. Forbush, S. E.: On World-Wide changes in Cosmic-Ray Intensity, Phys. Rev., 54, 12, 975–988, 1938. Harrison, R. G. and Stephenson, D. B.: Empirical evidence for a nonlinear effect of galactic cosmic rays on clouds, P. R. Soc. A., doi:10.1098/rspa.2005.1628, 2006. Hobbs, P. V.: Aerosol-cloud interactions, in: Aerosol-Cloud-Climate Interactions, edited by: Hobbs, P. V., Academic Press, 33–73, 1993. Kaufman, Y. J., Koren, I., Remer, L. A., Rosenfeld, D. and Rudich, Y. : The effect of smoke, dust and pollution aerosol on shallow cloud development over the Atlantic Ocean, Proc. Nat. Ac. Sci., 102, 32, 11 207–11 212, 2005. Kirkby, J.: Cosmic rays and climate, Surv. Geophys., 28, 333–375, 2007 Klein, S. A. and Hartmann, D. L.: The seasonal cycle of low stratiform clouds, J. Climate, 6, 1587–1606, 1993. Kniveton, D. R.: Precipitation, cloud cover and Forbush decreases in galactic cosmic rays, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 66, 1135–1142, 2004. Kristjánsson, J. E. and Kristiansen, J.: Is there a cosmic ray signal in recent variations in global cloudiness and cloud radiative forcing?, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 11 851–11 863, 2000. Kristjánsson, J. E., Staple, A., and Kristiansen, J.: A new look at possible connections between solar activity, clouds and climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 23, doi:10.1029/2002GL015646, 2002. Kristjánsson, J. E., Kristiansen, J., and Kaas, E.: Solar activity, cosmic rays, clouds and climate – an update, Adv. Space Res., 34, 407–415, 2004. Laut, P.: Solar activity and terrestrial climate: An analysis of some purported correlations, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 65, 801–812, 2003. Lockwood, M., and Fröhlich, C.: Recent oppositely directed trends in solar climate forcings and the global mean surface air temperature, P. R. Soc. A, 463, 2447–2460, 2007. Marsh, N. and Svensmark, H.: Cosmic rays, clouds and climate, Space Sci. Rev., 94, 215–230, 2000. Marsh, N. and Svensmark, H.: Galactic cosmic ray and El Niño – Southern Oscillation trends in International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project D2 low cloud properties, J. Geophys. Res., 108, D6, 4195, doi:10.1029/2001JD001264, 2003. Neher, H. V.: Cosmic rays at high latitudes and altitudes covering four solar maxima, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 1637–1651, 1971. Pallé, E. and Butler, C. J.: Sunshine records from Ireland: cloud factors and possible links to solar activity and cosmic rays, Int. J. Climatol., 21, 709–729, 2001. Platnick, S., King, M. D., Ackerman, S. A., Menzel, W. P., Baum, B. A., Riédi, J. C., and Frey, R. A.: The MODIS cloud products: Algorithms and examples from Terra, IEEE T. Geosci. Rem. Sens., 41, 459–473, 2003. Remer, L. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Mattoo, S., Martins, J. V., Ichoku, C., Levy, R. C., Kleidman, R., Tanré, D., Chu, D. A., Li, R. R., Eck, T. F., Vermote, E. and Holben, B. N.: The MODIS algorithm, products and validation, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 947–973, 2005. Rosenfeld, D., Kaufman, Y. J., and Koren, I.: Switching cloud cover and dynamical regimes from open to closed Benard cells in response to the suppression of precipitation by aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2503–2511, 2006. Rossow, W. B. and Schiffer, R. A.: Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP, Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 80, 2261–2287, 1999. Storelvmo, T., Kristjánsson, J. E., Ghan, S. J., Kirkevåg, A., Seland, Ø., and Iversen, T.: Predicting cloud droplet number concentration in CAM-Oslo, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D24208, doi:10.1029/2005JD006300, 2006. Svensmark, H. and Friis-Christensen, E.: Variation of cosmic ray flux and global cloud coverage – a missing link in solar-climate relationships, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 59, 11, 1225–1232, 1997. Svensmark, H., Pedersen, J. O. P., Marsh, N. D., Enghoff, M. B., and Uggerhøj, U. I.: Experimental evidence for the role of ions in particle nucleation under atmospheric conditions, Proc. R. Soc. A., doi:10.1098/rspa.2006.1773, 2006. Tinsley, B. A., Rohrbaugh, R. P., Hei, M., and Beard, K. V.: Effects of image charges on the scavenging of aerosol particles by cloud droplets and on droplet charging and possible ice nucleation processes, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 2118–2134, 2000. Todd, M. C. and Kniveton, D. R.: Changes in cloud cover associated with Forbush decreases of galactic cosmic rays, J. Geophys. Res., 106, D23, 32 031–32 041, 2001. Todd, M. C. and Kniveton, D. R.: Short-term variability in satellite-derived cloud cover and galactic cosmic rays: an update, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 66, 1205–1211, 2004. Twomey, S.: Aerosols, clouds and radiation, Atmos. Environ., 25A, 2435–2442, 1991. Udelhofen, P. M. and Cess, R. D.: Cloud cover variations over the United States: An influence of cosmic rays or solar variability?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 13, 2617–2620, 2001. Usoskin, I. G., Marsh, N., Kovaltsov, G. A., Mursula, K., and Gladysheva, O. G.: Latitudinal dependence of low cloud amount on cosmic ray induced ionization, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L16109, doi:10.1029/2004GL019507, 2004. Xue, H. and Feingold, G.: Large-eddy simulations of trade-wind cumuli: Investigation of aerosol indirect effects, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1605–1622, 2006. Yu, F. and Turco, R. P.: From molecular clusters to nanoparticles: Role of ambient ionisation in tropospheric aerosol formation, J. Geophys. Res., 106 (D5), 4797–4814, 2001. Yu, F.: Altitude variations of cosmic ray induced production of aerosols: Implications for global cloudiness and climate, J. Geophys. Res., 107 (A7), doi:10.1029/2001JA000248, 2002