Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 8, 13265-13299, 2008
© Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Cosmic rays, CCN and clouds – a reassessment using MODIS data
J. E. Kristjánsson1, C. W. Stjern1, F. Stordal1, A. M. Fjǽraa2, G. Myhre3, and K. Jónasson4
1Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
2Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway
3Center for International Climate and Environmental Research, Oslo, Norway
4Department of Mathematics, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland

Abstract. The response of clouds to sudden decreases in the flux of galactic cosmic rays (Forbush decrease events) has been investigated using cloud products from the space-borne MODIS instrument, which has been in operation since 2000. By focusing on pristine Southern Hemisphere ocean regions we examine areas which are particularly susceptible to changes in cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations, and where a cosmic ray signal should be easier to detect than elsewhere. While previous studies on the subject have mainly considered cloud cover, the high spatial and spectral resolution of MODIS allows for a more thorough study of microphysical parameters such as cloud droplet size, cloud water content and cloud optical depth, in addition to cloud cover. Averaging the results from the 13 Forbush decrease events that were considered, no systematic correlation was found between any of the four cloud parameters and galactic cosmic radiation, with a seemingly random distribution of positive and negative correlations. When only the three Forbush decrease events with the largest amplitude are studied, the correlations fit the hypothesis better, with 8 out of 12 correlations having the expected sign. Splitting the area of study into several sub-regions, one sub-region in the Atlantic Ocean showed statistically significant correlations compatible with a cosmic ray-induced enhancement of CCN and cloud droplet number concentrations. However, the lack of correlation in any of the other 5 sub-regions suggests that this may be a statistical co-incidence. Introducing a time lag of a few days for clouds to respond to the cosmic ray signal did not change the overall results. Singling out low clouds of intermediate optical depth with large susceptibility did not lead to higher correlations. In conclusion, no response to variations in cosmic rays associated with Forbush decrease events was found in marine low clouds in remote regions using MODIS data.

Citation: Kristjánsson, J. E., Stjern, C. W., Stordal, F., Fjǽraa, A. M., Myhre, G., and Jónasson, K.: Cosmic rays, CCN and clouds – a reassessment using MODIS data, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 8, 13265-13299, doi:10.5194/acpd-8-13265-2008, 2008.
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    Final Revised Paper