Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 8, 13233-13263, 2008
www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/13233/2008/
doi:10.5194/acpd-8-13233-2008
© Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Review Status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP.
Sensitivity of aerosol optical thickness and aerosol direct radiative effect to relative humidity
H. Bian1,2, M. Chin2, J. Rodriguez2, H. Yu1,2, J. E. Penner3, and S. Strahan1,2
1Goddard Earth Sciences and Technology Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
2Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
3Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Abstract. We present a sensitivity study on the effects of spatial and temporal resolution of atmospheric relative humidity (RH) on calculated aerosol optical thickness (AOT) and the aerosol direct radiative effects (DRE) in a global model. Using the same aerosol fields simulated in the Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) model, we find that, on a global average, the calculated AOT from RH in 1° latitude by 1.25° longitude spatial resolution is 11% higher than that in 2° by 2.5° resolution, and the corresponding DRE at the top of the atmosphere is 8–9% higher for total aerosols and 15% higher for only anthropogenic aerosols in the finer spatial resolution case. The difference is largest over surface escarpment regions (e.g. >200% over the Andes Mountains) where RH varies substantially with surface terrain. The largest zonal mean AOT difference occurs at 50–60°N (16–21%), where AOT is also relatively larger. A similar increase is also found when the time resolution of RH is increased. This increase of AOT and DRE with the increase of model resolution is due to the highly non-linear relationship between RH and the aerosol mass extinction efficiency (MEE) at high RH (>80%). Our study suggests that caution should be taken in a multi-model comparison (e.g. AeroCom) since the comparison usually deals with results coming from different spatial/temporal resolutions.

Citation: Bian, H., Chin, M., Rodriguez, J., Yu, H., Penner, J. E., and Strahan, S.: Sensitivity of aerosol optical thickness and aerosol direct radiative effect to relative humidity, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 8, 13233-13263, doi:10.5194/acpd-8-13233-2008, 2008.
 
Search ACPD
Discussion Paper
    XML
    Citation
    Final Revised Paper
    Share