1Env. Chem. and Technol. Program, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
2Wisconsin State Labor. of Hygiene, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53718, USA
3Molina Center for Energy and the Environment 2, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
4Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02319, USA
5CENICA, Instituto Nacional de Ecología-SEMARNAT., Mexico City, Mexico
6Dept. of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Saint Louis Univ., St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
Abstract. In order to expand the currently limited understanding of atmospheric mercury source-receptor relationships in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area, real time measurements of atmospheric mercury were made at a downtown urban site, and a rural site on the outskirts of Mexico City, during March, 2006.
Numerous short-lived increases in particulate mercury (PHg) and reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) concentrations were observed at the urban site during the 17 day study, and less frequent increases in gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) concentrations were measured at both the urban and rural sites. The episodic increases observed were attributed to plume impacts from industrial point source emissions in and around Mexico City. Average concentrations and standard deviations measured during the study were as follows:
i) Urban site: PHg=187±300 pg m−3, RGM=62±64 pg m−3, GEM=7.2±4.8 ng m−3.
ii) Rural site: GEM=5.0±2.8 ng m−3.
Several source regions of atmospheric mercury to the urban and rural sites were determined using Concentration Field Analysis, in which atmospheric mercury measurements were combined with back trajectory data to determine source regions. Only some source regions correlated to mercury emission sources listed in the Federal Pollutant Release and Transfer Register, leaving the rest unaccounted for. Contributions of anthropogenic mercury point sources in and around Mexico City to concentration averages measured at the urban site during the study were estimated to be: 93±3% of reactive mercury (PHg and RGM), and; 81±0.4% of GEM. Point source contributions to GEM measured at the rural site were 72±1%. GEM and reactive mercury (PHg and RGM) were not found to correlate with biomass burning at either of the measurement sites.