Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net 1680-7367 1680-7375 7 3 2007 10.5194/acpd-7-8193-2007 http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/8193/2007/ http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/8193/2007/acpd-7-8193-2007.html http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/8193/2007/acpd-7-8193-2007.pdf 8193 8260 2007-06-14 Calibration and measurement uncertainties of a continuous-flow cloud condensation nuclei counter (DMT-CCNC): CCN activation of ammonium sulfate and sodium chloride aerosol particles in theory and experiment D. Rose rose@mpch-mainz.mpg.de G. P. Frank U. Dusek S. S. Gunthe M. O. Andreae U. Pöschl Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Biogeochemistry Department, P.O. Box 3060, 55020 Mainz, Germany Experimental and theoretical uncertainties in the measurement of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) with a continuous-flow thermal-gradient CCN counter from Droplet Measurement Technologies (DMT-CCNC) have been assessed by model calculations and calibration experiments with ammonium sulfate and sodium chloride aerosol particles in the diameter range of 20–220 nm. Experiments have been performed in the laboratory and during field measurement campaigns, extending over a period of more than one year and covering a wide range of operating conditions (650–1020 hPa ambient pressure, 0.5–1.0 L min−1 aerosol flow rate, 20–30°C inlet temperature, 4–34 K m−1 temperature gradient). For each set of conditions, the effective water vapor supersaturation (Seff) in the CCNC was determined from the measured CCN activation spectra and Köhler model calculations. High measurement precision was achieved under stable laboratory conditions, where relative variations of Seff in the CCNC were generally less than ±2%. During field measurements, however, the relative variability increased up to ±5–7%, which can be mostly attributed to variations of the CCNC column top temperature with ambient temperature. To assess the accuracy of the Köhler models used to calculate Seff, we have performed a comprehensive comparison and uncertainty analysis of the various Köhler models and thermodynamic parameterizations commonly used in CCN studies. For the relevant supersaturation range (0.05–2%), the relative deviations between different modeling approaches were as high as 25% for (NH4)2SO4 and 16% for NaCl. The deviations were mostly caused by the different parameterizations for the activity of water in aqueous solutions of (NH4)2SO4 and NaCl (activity parameterization, osmotic coefficient, and van't Hoff factor models). The uncertainties related to the model parameterizations of water activity clearly exceeded the CCNC measurement precision. Relative deviations caused by different ways of calculating or approximating solution density and surface tension did not exceed 3% for (NH4)2SO4 and 1.5% for NaCl. Nevertheless, they did exceed the CCNC measurement precision under well-defined operating conditions and should not be neglected in studies aimed at high accuracy. To ensure comparability of results, we suggest that CCN studies should always report exactly which Köhler model equations and parameterizations of solution properties were used. Substantial differences between the CCNC calibration results obtained with (NH4)2SO4 and NaCl aerosols under equal experimental conditions (relative deviations of Seff up to ~10%) indicate inconsistencies between widely used activity parameterizations derived from electrodynamic balance (EDB) single particle experiments (Tang and Munkelwitz, 1994; Tang, 1996) and hygroscopicity tandem differential mobility analyzer (HTDMA) aerosol experiments (Kreidenweis et al., 2005). Therefore, we see a need for further evaluation and experimental confirmation of preferred data sets and parameterizations for the activity of water in dilute aqueous (NH4)2SO4 and NaCl solutions. The experimental results were also used to test the CCNC flow model of Lance et al.~(2006), which describes the dependence of Seff on temperature, pressure, and flow rate in the CCN counter. This model could be applied after subtraction of a near-constant temperature offset and derivation of an instrument-specific thermal resistance parameter (RT≈1.8 K W−1). At Seff>0.1% the relative deviations between the flow model and experimental results were mostly less than 5%, when the same Köhler model approach was used. At Seff≤.1%, however, the deviations exceeded 20%, which can be attributed to non-idealities which also caused the near-constant temperature offset. Therefore, we suggest that the CCNC flow model can be used to extrapolate calibration results, but should generally be complemented by calibration experiments performed under the relevant operating conditions – during field campaigns as well as in laboratory studies. Andreae, M. O., Hegg, D., Feichter, J., Kloster, S., Levin, Z., Liousse, C., Radke, L., and Stier, P.: Sources and nature of atmospheric aerosols, in: Scientific assessment of the effects of aerosols on precipitation, edited by Z. Levin & W. Cotton, World Meteorological Organization, 2007. Andreae, M. O., Jones, C. D., and Cox, P. M.: Strong present-day aerosol cooling implies a hot future: Nature, 435, 1187–1190, 2005. Andreae, M. O., Rosenfeld, D., Artaxo, P., Costa, A. A., Frank, G. P., Longo, K. M., and Silva-Dias, M. A. F.: Smoking rain clouds over the Amazon: Science, 303, 1337–1342, 2004. Bilde, M. and Svenningsson, B.: CCN activation of slightly soluble organics: the importance of small amounts of inorganic salt and particle phase, Tellus B, 56, 128–134, 2004. Brechtel, F. J. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Predicting Particle Critical Supersaturation from Hygroscopic Growth Measurements in the Humidified TDMA. Part I: Theory and Sensitivity Studies, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 1854–1871, 2000. Broekhuizen, K., Pradeep Kumar, P., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Partially soluble organics as cloud condensation nuclei: Role of trace soluble and surface active species, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L01107, doi:10.1029/2003GL018203, 2004. Charlson, R. J., Seinfeld, J. H., Nenes, A., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., and Facchini, M. C.: Reshaping the theory of cloud formation, Science, 292, 2025–2026, 2001. Chen, J.-P.: Theory of Deliquescence and Modified Köhler Curves: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 51, 3505–3516, 1994. Chuang, P. Y., Collins, D. R., Pawlowska, H., Snider, J. R., Jonsson, H. H., Brenguier, J. L., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: CCN measurements during ACE-2 and their relationship to cloud microphysical properties, Tellus B, 52, 843–867, 2000. Delene, D. J. and Deshler, T.: Calibration of a photometric cloud condensation nucleus counter designed for deployment on a balloon package, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17, 459–467, 2000. Delene, D. J. and Deshler, T.: Vertical profiles of cloud condensation nuclei above Wyoming, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 12 579–12 588, 2001. Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., Hildebrandt, L., Curtius, J., Schneider, J., Walter, S., Chand, D., Drewnick, F., Hings, S., Jung, D., Borrmann, S., and Andreae, M. O.: Size Matters More Than Chemistry for Cloud-Nucleating Ability of Aerosol Particles, Science, 312, 1375–1378, 2006. Ervens, B., Cubison, M., Andrews, E., Feingold, G., Ogren, J. A., Jimenez, J. L., DeCarlo, P., and Nenes, A.: Prediction of cloud condensation nucleus number concentration using measurements of aerosol size distributions and composition and light scattering enhancement due to humidity, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10S32, doi:10.1029/2006JD007426, 2007. Frank, G. P., Dusek, U., and Andreae, M. O.: Technical note: A method for measuring size-resolved CCN in the atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 6, 4879–4895, 2006a. Frank, G. P., Dusek, U., and Andreae, M. O.: Technical note: Characterization of a static thermal-gradient CCN counter, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 6, 2151–2174, 2006b. Gerber, H. E., Hoppel, W. A., and Wojciechowski, T. A.: Experimental verification of the theoretical relationship between size and critical supersaturation of salt nuclei, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1836–1841, 1977. Giebl, H., Berner, A., Reischl, G., Puxbaum, H., Kasper-Giebl, A., and Hitzenberger, R.: CCN activation of oxalic and malonic acid test aerosols with the University of Vienna cloud condensation nuclei counter, J. Aerosol Sci., 33, 1623–1634, 2002. Gras, J. L.: CN, CCN and particle size in Southern Ocean air at Cape Grim, Atmos. Res., 35, 233–251, 1995. Gysel, M., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Hygroscopicity of Aerosol Particles at Low Temperatures. 2. Theoretical and Experimental Hygroscopic Properties of Laboratory Generated Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 63–68, 2002. Hänel, G.: The properties of atmospheric aerosol particles as functions of the relative humidity at thermodynamic equilibrium with the surrounding moist air, Adv. Geophys., 19, 73–188, 1976. Hudson, J. G.: An Instantaneous CCN Spectrometer, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 6, 1055–1065, 1989. Hudson, J. G.: Cloud Condensation Nuclei, J. Appl. Meteorol., 32, 596–607, 1993. Hudson, J. G. and Xie, Y.: Vertical distributions of cloud condensation nuclei spectra over the summertime northeast Pacific and Atlantic Oceans, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 30 219–30 229, 1999. Hudson, J. G. and Yum, S. S.: Cloud condensation nuclei spectra and polluted and clean clouds over the Indian Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8022, doi:10.1029/2001JD000829, 2002. IAPSAG: International aerosol precipitation science assessment group (IAPSAG): Aerosol pollution impact on precipitation: a scientific review, 2007. IPCC: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. Khain, A., Rosenfeld, D., and Pokrovsky, A.: Aerosol impact on the dynamics and microphysics of deep convective clouds, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 2639–2663, 2005. Koehler, K. A., Kreidenweis, S. M., DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Carrico, C. M., Ervens, B., and Feingold, G.: Water activity and activation diameters from hygroscopicity data–Part II: Application to organic species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 795–809, 2006. Köhler, H.: The nucleus in and the growth of hygroscopic droplets: Trans. Faraday Soc., 32, 1152–1161, 1936. Krämer, L., Pöschl, U., and Niessner, R.: Microstructural rearrangement of sodium chloride condensation aerosol particles on interaction with water vapor, J. Aerosol Sci., 31, 673–685, 2000. Kreidenweis, S. M., Koehler, K., DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Carrico, C., and Ervens, B.: Water activity and activation diameters from hygroscopicity data–Part I: Theory and application to inorganic salts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1357–1370, 2005. Lance, S., Medina, J., Smith, J. N., and Nenes, A.: Mapping the Operation of the DMT Continuous Flow CCN Counter, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40, 242–254, 2006. Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review: Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, 2005. Low, R. D. H.: A theoretical study of nineteen condensation nuclei, Journal de Recherches Atmospheriques, 4, 65–78, 1969. McDonald, J. E.: Erroneous cloud-physics applications of Raoult Law., J. Meteorol., 10, 68–78, 1953. McFiggans, G., Artaxo, P., Baltensperger, U., Coe, H., Facchini, M. C., Feingold, G., Fuzzi, S., Gysel, M., Laaksonen, A., Lohmann, U., Mentel, T. F., Murphy, D. M., O'Dowd, C. D., Snider, J. R., and Weingartner, E., The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2593–2649, 2006. Mikhailov, E., Vlasenko, S., Niessner, R., and Pöschl, U.: Interaction of aerosol particles composed of protein and salts with water vapor: hygroscopic growth and microstructural rearrangement, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 323–350, 2004. Mokbel, I., Ye, S., Jose, J., and Xans, P.: Study of non ideality of various aqueous sodium chloride solutions by vapor pressures measurements and correlation of experimental results by Pitzer's method, J. Chim. Phys., 94, 122–137, 1997. Pitzer, K. S. and Mayorga, G.: Thermodynamics of electrolytes. II. Activity and osmotic coefficients for strong electrolytes with one or both ions univalent, J. Phys. Chem., 77, 2300–2308, 1973. Pradeep Kumar, P., Broekhuizen, K., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Organic acids as cloud condensation nuclei: Laboratory studies of highly soluble and insoluble species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 509–520, 2003. Pruppacher, H. R. and Klett, J. D: Microphysics of clouds and precipitation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2007. Raymond, T. M. and Pandis, S. N.: Formation of cloud droplets by multicomponent organic particles, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4469, doi:10.1029/2003JD003503, 2003. Reade, L., Jennings, S. G., and McSweney, G.: Cloud condensation nuclei measurements at Mace Head, Ireland, over the period 1994–2002, Atmos. Res., 82, 610–621, 2006. Roberts, G., Mauger, G., Hadley, O., and Ramanathan, V.: North American and Asian aerosols over the eastern Pacific Ocean and their role in regulating cloud condensation nuclei, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D13205, doi:10.1029/2005JD006661, 2006. Roberts, G. C. and Nenes, A.: A Continuous-Flow Streamwise Thermal-Gradient CCN Chamber for Atmospheric Measurements, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 39, 206-221, 2005. Robinson, R. A. and Stokes, R. H.: Electrolyte Solutions, (revised), London: Butterworth, 1959. Rosenfeld, D. and Givati, A.: Evidence of orographic precipitation suppression by air pollution-induced aerosols in the western United States, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 45, 893–911, 2006. Scheibel, H. G. and Porstendörfer, J.: Generation of monodisperse Ag-and NaCl-aerosols with particle diameters between 2 and 300 nm, J. Aerosol Sci., 14, 113–126, 1983. Segal, Y. and Khain, A.: Dependence of droplet concentration on aerosol conditions in different cloud types: Application to droplet concentration parameterization of aerosol conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D15204, doi:10.1029/2005JD006561, 2006. Segal, Y., Khain, A., Pinsky, M., and Sterkin, A.: Sensitivity of raindrop formation in ascending cloud parcels to cloud condensation nuclei and thermodynamic conditions, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 130, 561–581, 2004. Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998. Snider, J. R., Guibert, S., Brenguier, J.-L., and Putaud, J.-P.: Aerosol activation in marine stratocumulus clouds: 2. Köhler and parcel theory closure studies, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8629, doi:10.1029/2002JD002692, 2003. Snider, J. R., Petters, M. D., Wechsler, P., and Liu, P. S. K.: Supersaturation in the Wyoming CCN Instrument, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23, 1323–1339, 2006. Tang, I. N.: Chemical and size effects of hygroscopic aerosols on light scattering coefficients, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 19 245–19 250, 1996. Tang, I. N. and Munkelwitz, H. R.: Water activities, densities, and refractive indices of aqueous sulfates and sodium nitrate droplets of atmospheric importance, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 18 801–18 808, 1994. Weast, R. C. and Astle, M. J.: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 63rd. Florida: CRC Press Inc., 1982. Wex, H., Kiselev, A., Stratmann, F., Zoboki, J., and Brechtel, F.: Measured and modeled equilibrium sizes of NaCl and (NH4)2SO4 particles at relative humidities up to 99.1%, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D21212, doi:10.1029/2004JD005507, 2005. Wiedensohler, A.: An approximation of the bipolar charge distribution for particles in the submicron size range, J. Aerosol Sci., 19, 387–389, 1988. Willeke, K. and Baron, P. A.: Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications. (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001. Young, K. C. and Warren, A. J.: A reexamination of the derivation of the equilibrium supersaturation curve for soluble particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 1138–1143, 1992.