Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net 1680-7367 1680-7375 7 3 2007 10.5194/acpd-7-8087-2007 http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/8087/2007/ http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/8087/2007/acpd-7-8087-2007.html http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/8087/2007/acpd-7-8087-2007.pdf 8087 8111 2007-06-11 The influence of cloud top variability from radar measurements on 3-D radiative transfer F. Richter falk.richter@awi.de K. Barfus F. H. Berger U. Görsdorf TU Dresden, Faculty of Forest, Geo and Hydro Sciences, Institute of Hydrology and Meteorology, Dresden, Germany German Meteorological Service, Lindenberg, Germany In radiative transfer simulations the simplification of cloud top structure by homogenous assumptions can breed to mistakes in comparison to realistic heterogeneous cloud top structures. This paper examines the influence of cloud top heterogeneity on the radiation at the top of the atmosphere. The use of cloud top measurements with a high temporal resolution allows to analyse small spatial cloud top heterogeneities by using the frozen turbulence assumption for the time – space conversion. Radiative observations are often based on satellite measurements, whereas small spatial structures are not considered in such treatments. A spectral analysis of the cloud top measurements showed slopes of power spectra between –1.8 and –2.0, this values are larger then the spectra of –5/3 which is often applied to generate cloud field variability. The comparison of 3-D radiative transfer results from cloud fields with homogenous and heterogeneous tops have been done for a single wavelength of 0.6 μm. The radiative transfer calculations result in lower albedos for heterogeneous cloud tops. The differences of albedos between heterogeneous and homogeneous cloud top decrease with increasing solar zenith angle. The influence of cloud top variability on radiances is shown. Explicitly in forward direction the reflectances for heterogeneous tops are larger, in backward direction lower. The largest difference of the mean reflectances (mean over cloud field) between homogeneous and heterogeneous cloud top is approximately 0.3, which is 30% of illumination. Austin, R., England, A., and Wakefield, G.: Special problems in the estimation of power-law spectra as applied to topographical modeling, Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, 32, 928–939, 1994. Baker, M., R.G., C., and Latham, J.: The influence of entrainment on the evolution of cloud droplet spectra: I A model of inhomogeneous mixing, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 106, 581–598, 1980. Barker, H W. and Davies, J A.: Solar Radiative Fluxes for Stochastic, Scale-invariant Broken Cloud Fields, J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 1115–1126, 1992. Brenguier, J.-L., Pawlowska, H., Schüller, L., Preusker, R., Fischer, J., and Fouquart, Y.: Radiative Properties of Boundary Layer Clouds: Droplet Effective Radius versus Number Concentration, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 803–821, 2000. Chin, H.-N S., Rodriguez, D J., Cederwall, R T., Chuang, C C., Grossman, A S., Yio, J J., Fu, Q., and Miller, M A.: A Microphysical Retrieval Scheme for Continental Low-Level Stratiform Clouds: Impacts of the Subadiabatic Character on Microphysical Properties and Radiation Budgets, Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 2511–2527, 2000. Lamb, D.: Encyclopedia of atmospheric sciences, Academic Press, 2002. Loeb, N G. and Coakley, J. A J.: Inference of Marine Stratus Cloud Optical Depths from Satellite Measurements: Does 1D Theory Apply ?, J. Climate, 11, 215–233, 1998. Loeb, N G., Varnai, T., and Winker, D M.: Influence of Subpixel-Scale Cloud-Top Structure on Reflectances from Overcast Stratiform Cloud Layers, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 2960–2973, 1998. Lucht, W.: An algorithm for the retrieval of albedo from space using semiempirical BRDF models, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38, 977–998, 2000. Macke, A., Mitchell, D., and Bremen, L.: Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer Calculations for Inhomogeneous Mixed Phase Clouds, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans Atmos., 24, 237–241, 1999. Marshak, A., Davis, A., and Titov, G.: The verisimilitude of the independent pixel approximation used in cloud remote sensing, Remote Sens. Environ., 52, 71–78, 1995a. Marshak, A., Davis, A., Wiscombe, W., and Cahalan, R.: Radiative smoothing in fractal clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 26 247–26 262, 1995b. Rahman, H., Verstraete, M M., and Pinty, B.: Coupled surface-atmosphere reflectance (CSAR) model. 1: Model description and inversion on synthetic data, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 20,779–20,801, 1993. Randall, D., Khairoutdinov, M., Arakawa, A., and Grabowski, W.: Breaking the Cloud Parameterization Deadlock, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1547–1564, 2003. Schreiber, T. and Schmitz, A.: Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests, Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 635–638, 1996. Schreiber, T. and Schmitz, A.: Surrogate time series, Physica D, 142, 346–382, 2000. Varnai, T. and Davies, R.: Effects of Cloud Heterogeneities on Shortwave Radiation: Comparison of Cloud-Top Variability and Internal Heterogeneity, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 4206–4224, 1999.