Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net 1680-7367 1680-7375 7 5 2007 10.5194/acpd-7-14171-2007 http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/14171/2007/ http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/14171/2007/acpd-7-14171-2007.html http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/14171/2007/acpd-7-14171-2007.pdf 14171 14208 2007-10-05 Influence of particle size and chemistry on the cloud nucleating properties of aerosols P. K. Quinn patricia.k.quinn@noaa.gov T. S. Bates D. J. Coffman D. S. Covert NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, WA 98115, USA Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Oceans, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA The ability of an aerosol particle to act as a cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) is a function of the size of the particle, its composition and mixing state, and the supersaturation of the cloud. In-situ data from field studies provide a means to assess the relative importance of these parameters. During the 2006 Texas Air Quality – Gulf of Mexico Atmospheric Composition and Climate Study (TexAQS-GoMACCS), the NOAA RV Ronald~H.~Brown encountered a wide variety of aerosol types ranging from marine near the Florida panhandle to urban and industrial in the Houston-Galveston area. These varied sources provided an opportunity to investigate the role of aerosol sources, chemistry, and size in the activation of particles to form cloud droplets. Measurements were made of CCN concentrations, aerosol chemical composition in the size range relevant for particle activation, and aerosol size distributions. Variability in aerosol composition was parameterized by the mass fraction of Hydrocarbon-like Organic Aerosol (HOA) for particle diameters less than 200 nm (vacuum aerodynamic). The HOA mass fraction in this size range was lowest for marine aerosol and highest for aerosol sampled close to anthropogenic sources. Combining all data from the experiment reveals that composition (defined by HOA mass fraction) explains 40% of the variance in the critical diameter for particle activation at 0.44% supersaturation (S). Correlations between HOA mass fraction and aerosol mean diameter show that these two parameters are essentially independent of one another for this data set. We conclude that, based on the variability of the HOA mass fraction observed during TexAQS-GoMACCS, composition played a significant role in determining the fraction of particles that could activate to form cloud droplets. In addition, we estimate the error that results in calculated CCN concentrations if the HOA mass fraction is neglected (i.e., a fully soluble composition of (NH₄)₂SO₄ is assumed) for the range of mass fractions and mean diameters observed during the experiment. This error is then related to the source of the aerosol. At 0.22 and 0.44% S, the error is considerable (>50%) for anthropogenic aerosol sampled near the source region as this aerosol had, on average, a high HOA mass fraction in the sub-200 nm diameter size range (vacuum aerodynamic). The error is lower for aerosol distant from anthropogenic source regions as it had a lower HOA mass fraction. Hence, the percent error in calculated CCN concentration is larger for organic-rich aerosol sampled near the source and smaller for aerosol sampled away from sources of anthropogenic particulate organic matter (POM). Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation 3. Sectional representation, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D3), 4026, doi:10.1029/2001JD000483, 2002. Alfarra, M. R., Coe, H., Allan, J. D., Bower, K. N., Boudries, H., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Jayne, J. T., Garforth, A. A., Li, S. M., and Wornsnop, D. R.: Characterization of urban and rural organic particulate matter in the lower Fraser valley using two Aerodyne mass spectrometers, Atmos. Environ., 38, 5745–5758, 2004. Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M. R., Bower, K. N., Williams, P. I., Gallagher, M. W., Jimenez, J. L., McDonald, A. G., Nemitz, E., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Coe, H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer. Part 2: Measurements of fine particulate chemical composition in two UK cities, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4091, doi:410.1029/2002JD002359, 2003. Bates, T. S., Coffman, D. J., Covert, D. S., and Quinn, P. K.: Regional marine boundary layer aerosol size distributions in the Indian, Atlantic and Pacific Oceans: A comparison of INDOEX measurements with ACE-1, ACE-2, and Aerosols99, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D19), 8026, doi:10.1029/2001JD001174, 2002. Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Coffman, D. J., et al.: Marine boundary layer dust and pollutant transport associated with the passage of a frontal system over eastern Asia, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D19S19, doi:10.1029/2003JD004094, 2004. Berner, A., Lurzer, C., Pohl, F., Preining, O., and Wagner, P.: The size distribution of the urban aerosol in Vienna, Sci. Total Environ., 13, 245–261, 1979. Boudries, H., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Alfarra, M. R., Allan, J., Bower, K. N., Coe, H., Pryor, S. C., Jimenez, J. L., Brook, J. R., Li, S., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical and physical processes controlling the distribution of aerosols in the Lower Fraser Valley, Canada during the PACIFIC 2001 field campaign, Atmos. Environ., 38, 5759–5774, 2004. Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Ghertner, D. A., Herndon, S., Shi, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Silva, P. J., Williams, P., Lanni, T., Drewnick, F., Demerjian, K. L., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chase studies of particulate emissions from in-use New York city vehicles, Aer. Sci. Tech., 38, 555–573, 2004. Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Jimenez, J. L., et al.: Chemical and microphysical characterization of ambient aerosols with the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 26, 185–222, 2007. Corrigan, C. E. and Novakov, T.: Cloud condensation nucleus activity of organic compounds: a laboratory study, Atmos. Environ., 33, 2661–2668, 1999. Cubison, M., Alfarra, M. R., Allan, J., Bower, K. N., Coe, H., McFiggans, G. B., Whitehead, J. D., Williams, P. I., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Hopkins, J., and Lee, J.: The characterization of pollution aerosol in a changing photochemical environment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5573–5588, 2006. Drewnick, F., Schwab, J. J., Jayne, J. T., Canagaratna, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Demergian, K. L.: Measurement of ambient aerosol composition during the PMTACS-NY 2001 using an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Part II: Chemically speciated mass distributions, Aer. Sci. Tech., 38, 104–117, 2004. Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., Hildebrandt, L., et al.: Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating ability of aerosol particles, Science, 312, 1375–1376, 2006. Ervens, B., Feingold, G., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: The influence of water-soluble organic carbon on cloud drop number concentration, J. Geophys. Res., 110, 18211, doi:10.1029/2004JD005634, 2005. Feingold, G.: Modeling of the first indirect effect: Analysis of measurement requirements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1997, doi:10.1029/2003GL017967, 2003. Fitzgerald, J. W. and Hoppel, W. A.: Equilibrium size of atmospheric aerosol particles as a function of relative humidity: Calculations based on measured aerosol properties, in: Hygroscopic Aerosols, edited by: Ruhnke, L. H. and Deepak, A., 21–34, A. Deepak, Hampton, VA, 1984. Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: Continued development of a cloud droplet formation parameterization for global climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 110, 11212, doi:10.1029/2003JD004324, 2005. Hudson, J.: Variability of the relationship between particle size and cloud-nucleating ability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L08801, doi:10.1029/2006GL028850, 2007. Huffman, J. A., Jayne, J. T., Drewnick, F., Aiken, A. C., Onasch, T., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Design, Modeling, Optimization, and Experimental Tests of a Particle Beam Width Probe for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 39, 1143–1163, 2005. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2001: Radiative forcing of climate change, in Climate Change 2001, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2001. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing, in The IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007. Lance, S., Medina, J., Smith, J. N., and Nenes, A.: Mapping the operation of the DMT continuous flow CCN counter, Aer. Sci. Tech., 40, 242–254, 2006. Maßling, A., Wiedensohler, A., Busch, B., Neusuß, C., Quinn, P., Bates, T., and Covert, D.: Hygroscopic properties of different aerosol types over the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1377–1397, 2003. McFiggans, G., Artaxo, P., Baltensperger, U., et al.: The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2593–2649, 2006. Mircea, M., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., and Charlson, R. J.: The influence of the organic aerosol component on CCN supersaturation spectra for different aerosol types, Tellus B, 54, 74–81, 2002. Nenes, A., Charlson, R. J., Facchini, M. C., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Can chemical effects on cloud droplet number rival the first indirect effect?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1848, doi:10.1029/2002GL015295, 2002. Petzold, A., Gysel, M., Vancassel, X., et al.: On the effects of organic matter and sulfur-containing compounds on the CCN activation of combustion particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3187–3203, 2005. Quinn, P. K., Coffman, D. J., Bates, T. S., Miller, T. L., Johnson, J. E., Welton, E. J., Neusüss, C., Miller, M., and Sheridan, P.: Aerosol optical properties during INDOEX 1999: Means, variabilities, and controlling factors, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D19), 8020, doi:10.1029/2000JD000037, 2002. Roberts, G. C. and Nenes, A.: A continuous-flow streamwise thermal gradient CCN chamber for atmospheric measurements, Aer. Sci. Tech., 39, 206–221, 2005. Rogers, R. R. and Yau, M. K.: A Short Course in Cloud Physics, Elsevier, New Yori, 1989. Saxena, P., Hildemann, L. M., McMurry, P. H., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Organics alter hygroscopic behavior of atmospheric particles, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 18 755–18 770, 1995. Schneider, J., Hock, N., Weimer, S., Borrmann, S., Kirchner, R., Vogt, R., and Scheer, V.: Nucleation particles in diesel exhaust: Composition inferred from in situ mass spectrometric analysis, Env. Sci. Tech., 39, 6153–6161, 2005. Shantz, N. C., Leaitch, W. R., and Caffrey, P. F.: Effect of organics of low solubility on the growth rate of cloud droplets, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4168, doi:10.1029/2002JD002540, 2003. Stratman, F. and Wiedensohler, A.: A new data inversion algorithm for DMPS measurements, J. Aerosol Sci., 27, 339–340, 1997. Twomey, S.: The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1149–1152, 1977. Whittlestone, S. and Zahorowski, W.: Baseline radon detectors for shipboard use: Development and deployment in the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1), J. Geophys. Res., 103, 16 743–16 751, 1998. Zhang, Q., Alfarra, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Canagaratna, M. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Deconvolution and quantification of hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols based on aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Tech., 39, 4938–4952, doi:10.1021/es0485681, 2005a. Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., and Jimenez, J. L.: Hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols in Pittsburgh: Insights into sources and processes of organic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3289–3311, 2005b.