<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACPD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACPD</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7375</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acpd-6-879-2006</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Cn to ccn relationships and cloud microphysical properties in different air masses at a free tropospheric site</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dupuy</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Laj</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sellegri</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Laboratoire de M&amp;eacute;t&amp;eacute;orologie Physique, Observatoire de Physique du Globe de Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS UMR 6016, Universit&amp;eacute; Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>now at: The Physics Department, NUIG, Galway, Ireland</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>01</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2006</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>6</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>879</fpage>
<lpage>898</lpage>
<permissions>
<license xlink:type="simple">
<license-p>This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/879/2006/acpd-6-879-2006.html">This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/879/2006/acpd-6-879-2006.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/879/2006/acpd-6-879-2006.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/879/2006/acpd-6-879-2006.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>The fraction of aerosol particles activated to droplets (CCN) is often
derived from semi-empirical relationships that commonly tend to overestimate
droplet number concentration leading to major uncertainties in global
climate models. One of the difficulties in relating aerosol
concentration to cloud microphysics and cloud albedo lies in the necessity
of working at a constant liquid water path (LWP), which is very difficult to
control.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
In this study we observed the relationships between aerosol number
concentration (N&lt;sub&gt;CN&lt;/sub&gt;), cloud droplet concentration (N&lt;sub&gt;&lt;i&gt;d&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/sub&gt;) and
effective radius (R&lt;sub&gt;eff&lt;/sub&gt;), at the Puy de D&amp;#244;me (France). A total of 20
cloud events were sampled representing a period of more than 250 h of
cloud sampling. Samples are classified first according to air mass origins
(Modified Marine, Continental and Polluted) and then according to their
liquid water content (Thin, Medium and Thick clouds).
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The CCN fraction of aerosols appears to vary significantly according to the
air mass origin. It is maximum for Continental air masses and minimum for
Polluted air masses. Surprisingly, the CCN fraction of Modified Marine air
masses fraction is lower than the continental air mass and from expected
from previous studies. The limited number of activated particles in Modified
Marine air masses is most likely the result of the presence of hydrophobic
organic compounds. The limited activation effect leads to a 0.5 to 1 &amp;mu;m
increase in R&lt;sub&gt;eff&lt;/sub&gt; with respect to an ideal Marine case. This is
significant and implies that the dR&lt;sub&gt;eff&lt;/sub&gt;/dN&lt;sub&gt;CN&lt;/sub&gt; of low-continental
clouds is higher than expected.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="20"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>