<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<issue_number>4</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-6-8011-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/8011/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/8011/2006/acpd-6-8011-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/8011/2006/acpd-6-8011-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>8011</start_page>
	<end_page>8068</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-08-23</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Process-based estimates of terrestrial ecosystem isoprene emissions</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Arneth</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2,3">
			<name>Ü. Niinemets</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="4">
			<name>S. Pressley</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="5">
			<name>J. Bäck</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="5">
			<name>P. Hari</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="6">
			<name>T. Karl</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="2">
			<name>S. Noe</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="7">
			<name>I. C. Prentice</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="8">
			<name>D. Serça</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="1">
			<name>T. Hickler</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="9">
			<name>A. Wolf</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="12" affiliations="1">
			<name>B. Smith</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystems Analysis, Centre for GeoBiosphere Science, Lund University Sölvegatan 12, 223 62, Lund, Sweden</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Riia 23, Tartu Estonia</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 64, Tartu 51014, Estonia</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Washington State University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Department of Forest Ecology, University of Helsinki, Finland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">Atmospheric Chemistry Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="7" content_type="html">QUEST, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="8" content_type="html">Laboratoire d’Aerologie, Toulouse, France</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="9" content_type="html">Forest Ecology, ETH Zuerich, Switzerland</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">In recent years evidence has emerged that the amount of isoprene emitted
from a leaf is affected by the CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; growth environment. Many &amp;ndash; though not
all &amp;ndash; laboratory experiments indicate that emissions increase significantly
at below-ambient CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; concentrations and decrease when concentrations
are raised to above ambient levels. A small number of process-based leaf
isoprene emission models can reproduce this CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-stimulation and
-inhibition. These models are briefly reviewed, and their performance in
standard conditions compared with each other and to an empirical algorithm.
One of the models was judged particularly useful to be incorporated into a
dynamic vegetation model framework, LPJ-GUESS, aiming to develop a tool that
allows the interactive effects of climate and increasing CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; concentration on vegetation distribution, productivity, and leaf and
ecosystem isoprene emissions to be explored. The coupled vegetation
dynamics-isoprene model is described and used here in a mode particularly
suited for the ecosystem scale, but it can be employed at the global level
as well.

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Annual and/or daily isoprene emissions simulated by the model were evaluated
against flux measurements (or model estimates that had previously been
evaluated with flux data) from a wide range of environments, and agreement
between modelled and simulated values was generally good. By using a dynamic
vegetation model, effects of canopy composition, disturbance history, or
trends in CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; concentration can be assessed. We show here for five
model test sites that the suggested CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-inhibition of leaf-isoprene
metabolism can be large enough to offset increases in emissions due to
CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-stimulation of vegetation productivity and leaf area growth. When
effects of climate change are considered atop the effects of atmospheric
composition the interactions between the relevant processes will become even
more complex. The CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-isoprene inhibition may have the potential to
significantly dampen the expected steep increase of ecosystem isoprene
emission in a future warmer atmosphere with higher CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; levels; this
effect raises important questions for projections of future atmospheric
chemistry and its connection to the terrestrial vegetation and carbon cycle.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

