<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-6-755-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/755/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/755/2006/acpd-6-755-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/755/2006/acpd-6-755-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>755</start_page>
	<end_page>794</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-01-25</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">The role of ozone atmosphere-snow gas exchange on polar, boundary-layer tropospheric ozone &amp;ndash; a review and sensitivity analysis</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. Helmig</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>L. Ganzeveld</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>T. Butler</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="3">
			<name>S. J. Oltmans</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR) and Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Science (PAOS), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0450, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Max-Plank Institute for Chemistry, Department of Atmospheric Chemistry, Joachim-Becher-Weg 27, D-55128, Mainz, P.O. Box 3060, 55020 Mainz, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Climate Monitoring Diagnostics Laboratory (CMDL), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80303, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Recent research on snowpack processes and
atmosphere-snow gas exchange has demonstrated that chemical and physical
interactions between the snowpack and the overlaying atmosphere have a
substantial impact on the composition of the lower troposphere. These
observations also imply that ozone deposition to the snowpack possibly
depends on parameters including the quantity and composition of deposited
trace gases, solar irradiance, snow temperature and the substrate below the
snowpack. Current literature spans a remarkably wide range of ozone
deposition velocities (v&lt;sub&gt;&lt;i&gt;d&lt;/i&gt;O3&lt;/sub&gt;); several studies even reported positive
ozone fluxes out of the snow. Overall, published values range from
~&amp;minus;3&amp;lt;v&lt;sub&gt;&lt;i&gt;d&lt;/i&gt;O3&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;lt;2 cm s&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, though most data are within
~0&amp;lt;v&lt;sub&gt;&lt;i&gt;d&lt;/i&gt;O3&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;lt;0.2 cm s&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;. These literature reveal a high
uncertainty in the parameterization and the magnitude of ozone fluxes into
(and possibly out of) snow-covered landscapes. In this study a chemistry and
tracer transport model was applied to investigate the sensitivity of
tropospheric ozone towards ozone deposition over Northern Hemisphere
snow-covered land and sea-ice. Model calculations using increasing v&lt;sub&gt;&lt;i&gt;d&lt;/i&gt;O3&lt;/sub&gt;
of 0.0, 0.01, 0.05 and 0.10 cm s&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; resulted in general ozone
sensitivities up to 20&amp;ndash;30% in the Arctic surface layer, and of up to
130% local increases in selected Northern Latitude regions. The
simulated ozone concentrations were compared with mean January ozone
observations from 18 Arctic stations. Best agreement between the model and
observations, not only in terms of absolute concentrations but also in the
hourly ozone variability, was found by applying an ozone deposition velocity
in the range of 0.00&amp;ndash;0.01 cm s&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, which is smaller than most
literature data and also significantly lower compared to the value of 0.05 cm
s&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; that is commonly applied in large-scale atmospheric chemistry
models. This sensitivity analysis demonstrates that large errors in the
description of the wintertime tropospheric ozone budget stem from the
uncertain magnitude of ozone deposition rates and the inability to properly
parameterize ozone fluxes to snow-covered landscapes.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

