<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<issue_number>3</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-6-5543-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/5543/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/5543/2006/acpd-6-5543-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/5543/2006/acpd-6-5543-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>5543</start_page>
	<end_page>5583</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-06-28</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Aerosol nucleation over oceans and the role of galactic cosmic rays</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>J. Kazil</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>E. R. Lovejoy</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="3">
			<name>M. C. Barth</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="4">
			<name>K. O’Brien</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Atmospheric Chemical Processes Group, Atmospheric Chemistry Division, NOAA ESRL, Boulder, CO, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">MMM/ACD, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">We investigate formation of sulfate aerosol in the marine troposphere from
neutral and charged nucleation of H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;SO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; and H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O. A box model
of neutral and charged aerosol processes is run on a grid covering the oceans.
Input data are taken from a model of galactic cosmic rays in the atmosphere, and
from global chemistry and transport models.
We find a weak aerosol production over the tropical oceans in the lower and
middle troposphere, and a stronger production at higher latitudes, most notably
downwind of industrial regions. The highest aerosol production, however, occurs
in the upper troposphere, in particular in the tropics.
This finding supports the proposition by which non-sea salt marine boundary
layer aerosol in tropical regions does not form in situ, but nucleates in the
upper troposphere from convectively lifted and cloud processed boundary layer
air rich in aerosol precursor gases, from where it descends in subsiding air
masses compensating convection.
Convection of boundary layer air also appears to drive the formation of
condensation nuclei in the tropical upper troposphere which maintains the
stratospheric aerosol layer in the absence of volcanic activity.
Neutral nucleation contributes only marginally to aerosol production in our
simulations. This highlights the importance of charged binary and of ternary
nucleation involving ammonia for aerosol formation.
In clean marine regions however, ammonia concentrations seem too low to
support ternary nucleation, making binary nucleation from ions a likely pathway
for sulfate aerosol formation.
On the other hand, our analysis indicates that the variation of ionization by
galactic cosmic rays over the decadal solar cycle does not entail a response
in aerosol production  and cloud cover via the second indirect aerosol effect
that would explain observed variations in global cloud cover.
We estimate that the variation in radiative forcing resulting from a response
of clouds to the change in galactic cosmic ray ionization and subsequent
aerosol production over the decadal solar cycle is smaller than the concurrent
variation of total solar irradiance.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

