<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<issue_number>3</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-6-5387-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/5387/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/5387/2006/acpd-6-5387-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/5387/2006/acpd-6-5387-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>5387</start_page>
	<end_page>5425</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-06-27</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Comparisons between SCIAMACHY atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; retrieved using (FSI) WFM-DOAS to ground based FTIR data and the TM3 chemistry transport model</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. P. Barkley</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>P. S. Monks</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1,5">
			<name>U. Frieß</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="3">
			<name>R. L. Mittermeier</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="3">
			<name>H. Fast</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="4">
			<name>S. Körner</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="4">
			<name>M. Heimann</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">EOS, Space Research Centre, Department of Physics &amp; Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Meteorological Service of Canada (MSC), Downsview, Ontario, Canada</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC), Jena, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Present address: Institute of Environmental Physics, Heidelberg, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; concentrations, retrieved from spectral measurements made in
the near infrared (NIR) by the SCIAMACHY instrument, using Full Spectral Initiation Weighting Function Modified
Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (FSI WFM-DOAS), are compared to
ground based Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) data and to the output from a global chemistry-transport model.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Analysis of the FSI WFM-DOAS retrievals with respect to the ground based FTIR instrument, located at Egbert, Canada,
show good agreement with an average negative bias of approximately &amp;minus;4.0% with a standard deviation of ~3.0%.
This bias which exhibits an apparent seasonal trend, is of unknown origin,
though slight differences between the averaging kernels of the instruments and the limited temporal coverage of the
FTIR data may be the cause. The relative scatter
of the retrieved vertical column densities is comparable to the spread of the FTIR measurements themselves.
Normalizing the CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; columns using the surface pressure does not affect the magnitude of this bias although it slightly
increases the scatter of the FSI data.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Comparisons of the FSI retrievals to the TM3 global chemistry-transport model, performed over four selected Northern
Hemisphere scenes show good agreement.
The correlation, between the time series of the SCIAMACHY and model monthly scene averages, are
~0.7 or greater, demonstrating the ability of SCIAMACHY to detect seasonal changes in the
CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; distribution. The amplitude of the seasonal cycle, peak to peak, observed by SCIAMACHY however,
is overestimated by a factor of 2&amp;ndash;3, which cannot be explained.
The yearly means detected by SCIAMACHY are within 2% of those of the model with the
mean difference between the CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; distributions also approximately 2.0%.
Additionally, analysis of the retrieved CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; distributions reveals structure
not evident in the model fields which correlates well with land classification type.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
From these comparisons, the overall precision and bias of the CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; columns retrieved by the
FSI algorithm are estimated to be close to 1.0% and &amp;lt;4.0% respectively.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

