<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<issue_number>3</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-6-4995-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/4995/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/4995/2006/acpd-6-4995-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/4995/2006/acpd-6-4995-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>4995</start_page>
	<end_page>5038</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-06-21</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Centennial evolution of the atmospheric methane budget: what do the carbon isotopes tell us?</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>K. R. Lassey</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>D. M. Etheridge</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. C. Lowe</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="3">
			<name>A. M. Smith</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1,4">
			<name>D. F. Ferretti</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 14-901, Wellington, New Zealand</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, PMB 1, Aspendale Vic. 3195, Australia</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai NSW 2234, Australia</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Little is known about how the methane source inventory and sinks have
evolved over recent centuries. New and detailed records of methane mixing
ratio and isotopic composition (&lt;sup&gt;12&lt;/sup&gt;CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;, &lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; and
&lt;sup&gt;14&lt;/sup&gt;CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;) from analyses of air trapped in polar ice and firn can
enhance this knowledge. We use existing bottom-up constructions of the
source history, including &apos;&apos;EDGAR&apos;&apos;-based constructions, to assemble a model
of the evolving global budget for methane and for its carbon isotope
composition through the 20th century. By matching such budgets to
atmospheric data, we examine the constraints imposed by isotope information
on those budget evolutions. Balancing both &lt;sup&gt;12&lt;/sup&gt;CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; and
&lt;sup&gt;13&lt;/sup&gt;CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; budgets requires participation by a highly-fractionating
atmospheric sink such as active chlorine (removing at least 10&amp;nbsp;Tg&amp;nbsp;yr&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;),
which has been proposed independently. Examining a companion
budget evolution for &lt;sup&gt;14&lt;/sup&gt;CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; exposes uncertainties in inferring the
fossil-methane source from atmospheric &lt;sup&gt;14&lt;/sup&gt;CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; data. Specifically,
methane evolution during the nuclear era is sensitive to the cycling
dynamics of &apos;&apos;bomb &lt;sup&gt;14&lt;/sup&gt;C&apos;&apos; (originating from atmospheric weapons tests)
through the biosphere. In addition, since ca 1970, direct production and
release of &lt;sup&gt;14&lt;/sup&gt;CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; from nuclear-power facilities is influential but
poorly quantified. Atmospheric &lt;sup&gt;14&lt;/sup&gt;CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; determinations in the nuclear
era have the potential to better characterize biospheric carbon cycling and
to better quantify the ill-determined nuclear-power source.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

