<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<issue_number>3</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-6-3913-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/3913/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/3913/2006/acpd-6-3913-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/3913/2006/acpd-6-3913-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>3913</start_page>
	<end_page>3943</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-05-17</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Re-evaluation of the 1950&amp;ndash;1962 total ozone record from Longyearbyen, Svalbard</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>C. Vogler</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. Brönnimann</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>G. Hansen</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Z&amp;uuml;rich, Switzerland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Troms&amp;oslash;, Norway</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The historical total ozone measurements taken with Dobson Spectrophotometer
#8 at Longyearbyen, Svalbard, Norway, in the period 1950&amp;ndash;1962 have been
re-analyzed and homogenized based on the original measurement logs, using
updated relevant parameters. In lack of sufficient calibration information,
an empirical quality assessment was performed, based on a climatological
comparison with ozone measurements in Troms&amp;#248;, using TOMS data at both
sites in the period 1979&amp;ndash;2001, and Dobson data in the period 1950&amp;ndash;1962. The
assessment revealed that, as in the case of the Troms&amp;#248; measurements, the
C wavelength pair direct-sun measurements are most trustworthy (and most
frequent), while the WMO standard reference mode AD direct-sun has a
systematic bias relative to this data set. Zenith-blue (ZB) measurements at
solar zenith angles (SZA) &amp;lt;80&amp;deg; were homogenized using two different
polynomials before and from 1957; also ZB measurements at larger SZAs were
homogenized by means of a normalization function derived from days with
measurements over a wide range of SZAs. CC&apos; zenith-cloudy measurements,
which are particularly frequent during the summer months, were homogenized
by applying correction factors for only two different cloud types: high thin
clouds and medium/low/thick clouds; a further diversification of corrections
reflecting cloud conditions did not prove significant. The combination of
all measurements yields a total of 4837 single values, covering 1676 days
from September 1950 to September 1962; moon measurements during the polar
night add another 137 daily means. The re-evaluated data show a convincing
agreement with measurements since 1979 (TOMS, SAOZ, Dobson) as well as with
the 1957&amp;ndash;1962 data stored at the World Ozone and UV Data Centre (WOUDC).</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

