<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<issue_number>6</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-6-12121-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/12121/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/12121/2006/acpd-6-12121-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/12121/2006/acpd-6-12121-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>12121</start_page>
	<end_page>12153</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-11-27</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Solar cycle variations of stratospheric ozone and temperature in simulations of a coupled chemistry-climate model</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Austin</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>L. L. Hood</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>B. E. Soukharev</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">NOAA Geophysical Fluid dynamics Laboratory, PO Box 308, Princeton, NJ 08542-0308, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The results from three 45-year simulations of a coupled chemistry climate model
are analysed for solar cycle influences on ozone and temperature. The
simulations include UV forcing at the top of the atmosphere, which includes a
generic 27-day solar rotation effect as well as the observed monthly values of
the solar fluxes. The results are analysed for the 27-day and 11-year
cycles in temperature and ozone. In accordance with previous results, the
27-day cycle results are in good qualitative agreement with observations,
particularly for ozone. However, the results show significant variations,
typically a factor of two or more in sensitivity to solar flux, depending on
the solar cycle.

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
We show for the first time good agreement also between the observed 11-year
cycle and model results for the ozone vertical profile, which both indicate
a minimum in solar response near 20 hPa. In comparison, simulations of the
model with fixed solar phase (solar maximum/solar mean) and climatological sea
surface temperatures lead to a poor simulation of the solar response in the
ozone vertical profile. The results indicate the need for variable phase
simulations in solar sensitivity experiments and the role of sea surface
temperatures is discussed.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

