<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACPD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACPD</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7375</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acpd-6-10991-2006</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Efficiency of cloud condensation nuclei formation from ultrafine particles</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pierce</surname>
<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adams</surname>
<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<addr-line>Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>03</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2006</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>6</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>10991</fpage>
<lpage>11023</lpage>
<permissions>
<license xlink:type="simple">
<license-p>This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/10991/2006/acpd-6-10991-2006.html">This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/10991/2006/acpd-6-10991-2006.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/10991/2006/acpd-6-10991-2006.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/10991/2006/acpd-6-10991-2006.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Atmospheric cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations are a key
uncertainty in the assessment of the effect of anthropogenic aerosols on
clouds and climate. The ability of new ultrafine particles to grow to become
CCN varies throughout the atmosphere and must be understood in order to
understand CCN formation. We have developed the Probability of Ultrafine
particle Growth (PUG) model to answer questions regarding which growth and
sink mechanisms control this growth, how the growth varies between different
parts of the atmosphere and how uncertainties with respect to the magnitude
and size distribution of ultrafine emissions translates into uncertainty in
CCN generation. It was found in most cases that condensation is the dominant
growth mechanism and coagulation with larger particles is the dominant sink
mechanism for ultrafine particles. In this work we found that the
probability of a new ultrafine particle generating a CCN varies from
&amp;lt;0.1% to &amp;gt;90% in different parts of the atmosphere, though in the
boundary layer a large fraction of ultrafine particles have a probability
between 5% and 40%. Some regions, such as the tropical free
troposphere, are areas with high probabilities; however, variability within
regions makes it difficult to predict which regions of the atmosphere are
most efficient for generating CCN from ultrafine particles. For a given mass
of primary ultrafine aerosol, an uncertainty of a factor of two in the modal
diameter can lead to an uncertainty in the number of CCN generated as high
as a factor for eight. It was found that no single moment of the primary
aerosol size distribution, such as total mass or number, is a robust
predictor of the number of CCN ultimately generated. Therefore, a complete
description of the size distribution is generally required for global
aerosol microphysics models.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="33"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>