<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<issue_number>6</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-6-10991-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/10991/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/10991/2006/acpd-6-10991-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/10991/2006/acpd-6-10991-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>10991</start_page>
	<end_page>11023</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-11-03</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Efficiency of cloud condensation nuclei formation from ultrafine particles</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. R. Pierce</name>
			<email>jrpierce@andrew.cmu.edu</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2,3">
			<name>P. J. Adams</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Atmospheric cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations are a key
uncertainty in the assessment of the effect of anthropogenic aerosols on
clouds and climate. The ability of new ultrafine particles to grow to become
CCN varies throughout the atmosphere and must be understood in order to
understand CCN formation. We have developed the Probability of Ultrafine
particle Growth (PUG) model to answer questions regarding which growth and
sink mechanisms control this growth, how the growth varies between different
parts of the atmosphere and how uncertainties with respect to the magnitude
and size distribution of ultrafine emissions translates into uncertainty in
CCN generation. It was found in most cases that condensation is the dominant
growth mechanism and coagulation with larger particles is the dominant sink
mechanism for ultrafine particles. In this work we found that the
probability of a new ultrafine particle generating a CCN varies from
&amp;lt;0.1% to &amp;gt;90% in different parts of the atmosphere, though in the
boundary layer a large fraction of ultrafine particles have a probability
between 5% and 40%. Some regions, such as the tropical free
troposphere, are areas with high probabilities; however, variability within
regions makes it difficult to predict which regions of the atmosphere are
most efficient for generating CCN from ultrafine particles. For a given mass
of primary ultrafine aerosol, an uncertainty of a factor of two in the modal
diameter can lead to an uncertainty in the number of CCN generated as high
as a factor for eight. It was found that no single moment of the primary
aerosol size distribution, such as total mass or number, is a robust
predictor of the number of CCN ultimately generated. Therefore, a complete
description of the size distribution is generally required for global
aerosol microphysics models.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

