<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<issue_number>5</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-6-10837-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/10837/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/10837/2006/acpd-6-10837-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/10837/2006/acpd-6-10837-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>10837</start_page>
	<end_page>10882</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-10-25</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Connections between atmospheric sulphuric acid and new particle formation during QUEST III–IV campaigns in Heidelberg and Hyytiälä</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>I. Riipinen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>S.-L. Sihto</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Kulmala</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="2">
			<name>F. Arnold</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Dal Maso</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="3">
			<name>W. Birmili</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="4">
			<name>K. Saarnio</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="4">
			<name>K. Teinilä</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="4">
			<name>V.-M. Kerminen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="5">
			<name>A. Laaksonen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="6">
			<name>K. E. J. Lehtinen</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">University of Helsinki, Department of Physical Sciences, P.O. Box 64, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Max-Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics (MPIK), Atmospheric Physics Division, P.O. Box 103980, 69029 Heidelberg, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Finnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palmenin Aukio 1, P.O. Box 503, 00101 Helsinki, Finland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">University of Kuopio, Department of Applied Physics, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">Finnish Meteorological Institute and University of Kuopio, Department of Applied Physics, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">This study investigates the connections between atmospheric
sulphuric acid and new particle formation during QUEST&amp;nbsp;III and
BACCI/QUEST&amp;nbsp;IV campaigns. The campaigns have been conducted in
Heidelberg (2004) and Hyyti&amp;#228;l&amp;#228; (2005), the first
representing a polluted site surrounded by deciduous forest, and
the second a rural site in a boreal forest environment. We have
studied the role of sulphuric acid in particle formation and
growth by determining 1) the power-law dependencies between
sulphuric acid ([H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;SO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;]), and particle concentrations
(&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&amp;ndash;6&lt;/sub&gt;) or formation rates at 1 nm and 3 nm (&lt;i&gt;J&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; and
&lt;i&gt;J&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;; 2) the time delays between [H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;SO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;] and
&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&amp;ndash;6&lt;/sub&gt; or &lt;i&gt;J&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;, and the growth rates for 1&amp;ndash;3 nm particles;
3) the empirical nucleation coefficients &lt;i&gt;A&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;K&lt;/i&gt; in relations
&lt;i&gt;J&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;=&lt;i&gt;A&lt;/i&gt;[H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;SO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;] and
&lt;i&gt;J&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;=&lt;i&gt;K&lt;/i&gt;[H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;SO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;]&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, respectively; 4) theoretical
predictions for &lt;i&gt;J&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; and &lt;i&gt;J&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; for the days when no
significant particle formation is observed, based on the observed
sulphuric acid concentrations and condensation sinks. In both
environments, &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&amp;ndash;6&lt;/sub&gt; or &lt;i&gt;J&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and [H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;SO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;] were
linked via a power-law relation with exponents typically ranging
from 1 to 2. The result suggests that the cluster activation
theory and kinetic nucleation have the potential to explain the
observed particle formation. However, some differences between the
sites existed: The 1&amp;ndash;3 nm growth rates were slightly higher and
the nucleation coefficients about an order of magnitude greater in
Heidelberg than in Hyyti&amp;#228;l&amp;#228; conditions. The time lags
between &lt;i&gt;J&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and [H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;SO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;] were consistently lower than
the corresponding delays between &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&amp;ndash;6&lt;/sub&gt; and [H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;SO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;].
The exponents in the &lt;i&gt;J&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;#x221D;[H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;SO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;]&lt;sup&gt;n&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sub&gt;J3&lt;/sub&gt;-connection were consistently higher than or equal to
the exponents in the relation &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&amp;ndash;6&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;#x221D;[H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;SO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;]&lt;sup&gt;n&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sub&gt;N36&lt;/sub&gt;. In the &lt;i&gt;J&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; values, no significant
differences were found between the observed rates on particle
formation event days and the predictions on non-event days. The
&lt;i&gt;J&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; values predicted by the cluster activation or kinetic
nucleation hypotheses, on the other hand, were considerably lower
on non-event days than the rates observed on particle formation
event days. This study provides clear evidence implying that the
main process limiting the observable particle formation is the
competition between the growth of the freshly formed particles and
their loss by scavenging, rather than the initial particle
production by nucleation of sulphuric acid. In general, it can be
concluded that the simple models based on sulphuric acid
concentrations and particle formation by cluster activation or
kinetic nucleation can predict the occurence of atmospheric
particle formation and growth well, if the particle scavenging is
accurately accounted for.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

