<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>6</volume_number>
		<issue_number>5</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-6-10523-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/10523/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/10523/2006/acpd-6-10523-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/10523/2006/acpd-6-10523-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>10523</start_page>
	<end_page>10565</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-10-18</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Free radical modelling studies during the UK TORCH Campaign in summer 2003</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,7">
			<name>K. M. Emmerson</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>N. Carslaw</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>D. C. Carslaw</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="3">
			<name>J. D. Lee</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="4">
			<name>G. McFiggans</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="5">
			<name>W. Bloss</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="5">
			<name>T. Gravestock</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="5">
			<name>D. E. Heard</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="3">
			<name>J. Hopkins</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="5">
			<name>T. Ingham</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="5">
			<name>M. J. Pilling</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="12" affiliations="5">
			<name>S. C. Smith</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="13" affiliations="6,8">
			<name>M. J. Jacob</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="14" affiliations="6">
			<name>P. S. Monks</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Environment Department, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, M60 1QD, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="7" content_type="html">now at: School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="8" content_type="html">now at: IÖZ (Interdisciplinary Environmental Research Centre), TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Brennhausgasse 14, 09599 Freiberg, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The Tropospheric ORganic CHemistry experiment (TORCH) took place during the
heatwave of summer 2003 at Writtle College, a site 2 miles west of
Chelmsford in Essex and 25 miles north east of London. The experiment was
one of the most highly instrumented to date. A combination of a large number
of days of simultaneous, collocated measurements, a consequent wealth of
model constraints and a highly detailed chemical mechanism, allowed the
atmospheric chemistry of this site to be studied in detail. The
concentrations of the hydroxyl radical, the hydroperoxy radical and the sum
of peroxy radicals, were measured between 25 July and 31 August
using laser-induced fluorescence at low pressure and the peroxy
radical chemical amplifier techniques. The concentrations of the radical
species were predicted using a zero-dimensional box model based on the
Master Chemical Mechanism version&amp;nbsp;3.1, which was constrained with the
observed concentrations of relatively long-lived species. The model included
a detailed parameterisation to account for heterogeneous loss of hydroperoxy
radicals onto aerosol particles. Quantile-quantile plots were used to assess
the model performance in respect of the measured radical concentrations. On
average, measured hydroxyl radical concentrations were over-predicted by
24%. Modelled and measured hydroperoxy radical concentrations agreed very
well, with the model over-predicting on average by only 7%. The sum of
peroxy radicals was under-predicted when compared with the respective
measurements by 22%. OH initiation was dominated by the reactions of
excited oxygen atoms with water, nitrous acid photolysis and the ozone
reaction with alkene species. Photolysis of aldehyde species was the main
initiation route for HO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and RO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. Termination, under all
conditions, primarily involved reactions with NO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; for OH and
heterogeneous chemistry on aerosol surfaces for HO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. The OH chain
length varied between 2 and 8 cycles, the longer chain lengths occurring
before and after the most polluted part of the campaign. Peak local ozone
production of 17 ppb hr&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt; occurred on 3 and 5 August,
signifying the importance of local chemical processes to ozone production on
these days. On the whole, agreement between model and measured radicals is
good, giving confidence that our understanding of atmospheres influenced by
nearby urban sources is adequate.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

