<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>5</volume_number>
		<issue_number>5</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2005</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-5-8791-2005</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/8791/2005/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/8791/2005/acpd-5-8791-2005.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/8791/2005/acpd-5-8791-2005.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>8791</start_page>
	<end_page>8810</end_page>
	<publication_date>2005-09-15</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Seasonal variability of monoterpene emission factors for a ponderosa pine plantation in California</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>R. Holzinger</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Lee</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. McKay</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. H. Goldstein</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">University of California at Berkeley, Dept. Environm. Sci. Policy &amp; Management, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Monoterpene fluxes have been measured over an 11-month period from June 2003
to April 2004. During all seasons ambient air temperature was the
environmental factor most closely related to the measured emission rates.
The monoterpene flux was modeled with the exponential relation suggested by
Tingey et al.&amp;nbsp;(1980) and Guenther et al.&amp;nbsp;(1993); a
basal emission of 1.0 &amp;mu;mol h&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt;m&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;2&lt;/sup&gt; (at 30&amp;deg;C, based on
leaf area) and a temperature dependence (&amp;beta;) of 0.12&amp;deg;C&lt;sup&gt;&amp;minus;1&lt;/sup&gt;
reproduced measured summer emissions well but underestimated spring and
winter measured emissions by 60&amp;ndash;130%. The total annual monoterpene
emission may be underestimated by ~50% when using a model optimized
to reproduce monoterpene emissions in summer. The long term dataset also
reveals an indirect connection between non-stomatal ozone and monoterpene
flux beyond the dependence on temperature that has been shown for both
fluxes.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

