<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>5</volume_number>
		<issue_number>4</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2005</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-5-7283-2005</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/7283/2005/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/7283/2005/acpd-5-7283-2005.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/7283/2005/acpd-5-7283-2005.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>7283</start_page>
	<end_page>7308</end_page>
	<publication_date>2005-08-22</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">The initial dispersal and radiative forcing of a Northern Hemisphere mid latitude super volcano: a Yellowstone case study</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>C. Timmreck</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>H.-F. Graf</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Max-Planck Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Centre for Atmospheric Science University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The chemistry climate model MAECHAM4/CHEM with
interactive and prognostic volcanic aerosol and ozone, was used
to study the initial dispersal and radiative  forcing
of a possible Yellowstone super eruption.
Tropospheric climate anomalies are not analysed since sea
surface temperatures are kept fix. Our experiments show that the global
dispersal of a Yellowstone super eruption is strongly dependent on the
season of the eruption. In Northern Hemisphere summer the volcanic cloud is
transported westward and preferentially southward, while in Northern
Hemisphere winter the cloud is transported eastward and more northward
compared to the summer case. Aerosol induced heating leads to a more global
spreading with a pronounced cross equatorial transport. For a summer
eruption aerosol is transported much further to the Southern Hemisphere
than for a winter eruption.
 In contrast to Pinatubo case studies, strong cooling
tendencies appear with maximum values of &amp;ndash;1.6 K/day three months after the
eruption in the upper tropical stratosphere.
This strong cooling effect weakens with decreasing aerosol density
over time and initially prevents the aerosol laden air from further active
rising.
 All-sky net radiative flux changes of more than 32 W/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; at the surface
are  about a factor of 6
larger than for the Pinatubo eruption. Large positive flux
anomalies of more than 16 W/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; are found in the first months in the
tropics and sub tropics. These strong forcings call for a fully coupled
ocean/atmosphere/chemistry model to study climate sensitivity.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

