<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACPD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACPD</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7375</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acpd-5-4845-2005</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Validation of IFE-1.6 SCIAMACHY limb ozone profiles</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Segers</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>van Savigny</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Brinksma</surname>
<given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Piters</surname>
<given-names>A. J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Royal Dutch Meteorological Institute (KNMI), P.O. Box 201, 3730 AE De Bilt, The Netherlands</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing (IUP/IFE), University of Bremen, Germany</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>14</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2005</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>4845</fpage>
<lpage>4869</lpage>
<permissions>
<license xlink:type="simple">
<license-p>This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/4845/2005/acpd-5-4845-2005.html">This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/4845/2005/acpd-5-4845-2005.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/4845/2005/acpd-5-4845-2005.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/4845/2005/acpd-5-4845-2005.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>The IFE-1.6 scientific data set of SCIAMACHY limb ozone profiles is
    validated for the period August&amp;ndash;December 2002.
    The data set provides ozone profiles over an altitude range of 15&amp;ndash;45 km.
    The main uncertainty in the profiles is the imprecise knowledge
    of the pointing of the instrument, leading to retrieved
    profiles that are shifted in altitude direction.
    To obtain a first order correction for the pointing error and the remaining
    uncertainties, the retrieved profiles are compared to their a-priori value
    and ozone sondes based on absolute distance and equivalent
    latitude criteria.
    A vertical shift of the satellite profiles with 2 km downward
    is found to be an appropriate correction for the data set studied.
    A total root-mean-square difference between limb profiles and
    sondes of 10&amp;ndash;15% remains for the stratospheric ozone profile
    after application of the correction.
    Small biases are left above and below the ozone maximum at mid latitudes,
    where the vertical gradients in the retrieved product are in general too strong.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="25"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>