<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>5</volume_number>
		<issue_number>4</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2005</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-5-4845-2005</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/4845/2005/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/4845/2005/acpd-5-4845-2005.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/4845/2005/acpd-5-4845-2005.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>4845</start_page>
	<end_page>4869</end_page>
	<publication_date>2005-07-14</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Validation of IFE-1.6 SCIAMACHY limb ozone profiles</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. J. Segers</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>C. van Savigny</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>E. J. Brinksma</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. J. M. Piters</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Royal Dutch Meteorological Institute (KNMI), P.O. Box 201, 3730 AE De Bilt, The Netherlands</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing (IUP/IFE), University of Bremen, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The IFE-1.6 scientific data set of SCIAMACHY limb ozone profiles is
    validated for the period August&amp;ndash;December 2002.
    The data set provides ozone profiles over an altitude range of 15&amp;ndash;45 km.
    The main uncertainty in the profiles is the imprecise knowledge
    of the pointing of the instrument, leading to retrieved
    profiles that are shifted in altitude direction.
    To obtain a first order correction for the pointing error and the remaining
    uncertainties, the retrieved profiles are compared to their a-priori value
    and ozone sondes based on absolute distance and equivalent
    latitude criteria.
    A vertical shift of the satellite profiles with 2 km downward
    is found to be an appropriate correction for the data set studied.
    A total root-mean-square difference between limb profiles and
    sondes of 10&amp;ndash;15% remains for the stratospheric ozone profile
    after application of the correction.
    Small biases are left above and below the ozone maximum at mid latitudes,
    where the vertical gradients in the retrieved product are in general too strong.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

