<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>5</volume_number>
		<issue_number>4</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2005</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-5-4477-2005</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/4477/2005/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/4477/2005/acpd-5-4477-2005.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/4477/2005/acpd-5-4477-2005.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>4477</start_page>
	<end_page>4505</end_page>
	<publication_date>2005-07-06</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Refining temperature measures in thermal/optical carbon analysis</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. C. Chow</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. G. Watson</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>L.-W. A. Chen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>G. Paredes-Miranda</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1">
			<name>M.-C. O. Chang</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="1">
			<name>D. Trimble</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="2">
			<name>K. Fung</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="3">
			<name>H. Zhang</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="3">
			<name>J. Z. Yu</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV 89512, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Atmoslytic Inc., 24801 Alexandra Ct., Calabasas, CA 91302, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The thermal/optical method has been widely used for quantifying total carbon
(TC), organic carbon (OC), and elemental carbon (EC) content in ambient and
source particulate samples. Thermally defined carbon fractions have been
used for source identification. Temperature precision in thermal carbon
analysis is critical to the allocation of carbon fractions. The sample
temperature is determined by a thermocouple, which is usually located in the
oven near the sample punch, and which may be biased due to different thermal
properties between the sample filter punch and the thermocouple, or the
inhomogeneity in the heating zone. Quick-drying temperature-indicating
liquids (Tempil Inc., South Plainfield, NJ) of different liquefying points
are used as temperature calibration standards. These temperature indicators
consist of chemicals that change their appearance at specific temperatures,
and can be optically monitored to determine the sample temperature.
Temperature measures were evaluated for three different models of carbon
analyzers. The actual sample temperature was frequently underestimated by 10
to 50&amp;deg;C in all three analyzers. This experiment allowed calibration
curves to be constructed that relate the sample temperature to the
temperature measured by a thermocouple. Even though temperature variations
of up to 50&amp;deg;C do not alter the OC and EC concentrations, a positive
bias of 14 to 22&amp;deg;C during thermal analysis can significantly change
carbon fraction measurements.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

