|
|
Characterization of ambient aerosols in Mexico City during the MCMA-2003 campaign with Aerosol Mass Spectrometry – Part I: quantification, shape-related collection efficiency, and comparison with collocated instrumentsD. Salcedo, K. Dzepina, T. B. Onasch, M. R. Canagaratna, Q. Zhang, A.. R. Huffman, P. F. DeCarlo, J. T. Jayne, P. Mortimer, D. R. Worsnop, C. E. Kolb, K. S. Johnson, B. Zuberi, L. C. Marr, L. T. Molina, M. J. Molina, R. M. Bernabé, B. Cardenas, C. Márquez, J. S. Gaffney, N. A. Marley, A. Laskin, V. Shutthanandan, and J. L. JimenezAbstract Notice on Discussion StatusThe requested discussion paper has a corresponding peer-reviewed
final revised paper in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). You are
encouraged to refer to the final revised version. Final Revised Paper (ACP) Discussion Paper (PDF, 812 KB) Discussion Paper (PDF, 812 KB) Final Revised Paper (ACP) Special Issue | Interactive Discussion | Status: Closed |
| AC: Author Comment | RC: Referee Comment | SC: Short Comment | EC: Editor Comment |
- Printer-friendly Version - Supplement |
| | RC S1458: 'Review of Salcedo et al.', Anonymous Referee #3, 30 Jun 2005 | | | RC S1577: 'AMS Instrumentation Study in Mexico City', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Jul 2005 | | | EC S1599: 'Clarifying Remarks by the Editor', Ulrich Pöschl, 18 Jul 2005 | RC S1711: 'Response to Editors Comments', Anonymous Referee #3, 25 Jul 2005 | | | RC S1707: 'Review of MCMA-2003 Part I', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Jul 2005 | | | RC S1785: 'Response to Editor\'s Comments', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Jul 2005 | | | AC S2196: 'General Response to Comments', Dara Salcedo, 22 Aug 2005 |
|
|