<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>5</volume_number>
		<issue_number>3</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2005</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-5-3313-2005</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/3313/2005/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/3313/2005/acpd-5-3313-2005.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/3313/2005/acpd-5-3313-2005.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>3313</start_page>
	<end_page>3340</end_page>
	<publication_date>2005-05-25</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Evidence of systematic errors in SCIAMACHY-observed CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; due to aerosols</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>S. Houweling</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>W. Hartmann</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>I. Aben</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>H. Schrijver</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Skidmore</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="2">
			<name>G.-J. Roelofs</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="3">
			<name>F.-M. Breon</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">National Institute for Space Research (SRON), Utrecht, The Netherlands</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research (IMAU), Utrecht, The Netherlands</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Laboratoire des Sciences du Climate et de l’Environnement, Gif sur Yvette, France</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">SCIAMACHY CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; measurements show a large variability in total column CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; over the Sahara desert of up to 10% that is not anticipated from in situ
measurements and cannot be explained by results of atmospheric models.
Comparisons with colocated aerosol measurements by TOMS and MISR over the
Sahara indicate that the seasonal variation of SCIAMACHY-observed CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; strongly resembles seasonal variations of windblown dust. Correlation
coefficients of monthly datasets of colocated MISR aerosol optical depth and
SCIAMACHY CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; vary between 0.6 and 0.8, indicating that about half of the CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; variance is explained by aerosol optical depth. Radiative transfer
model calculations confirm the role of dust and can explain the size of the
errors. Sensitivity tests suggest that the remaining variance may largely be
explained by variations in the vertical distribution of dust. Further
calculations for a few typical aerosol classes and a broad range of
atmospheric conditions show that the impact of aerosols on SCIAMACHY
retrieved CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; is by far the largest over the Sahara, but may also reach
significant levels elsewhere. Inverse modelling calculations indicate that
continental scale source and sink estimation on the basis of SCIAMACHY CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; data without aerosol correction leads to significant errors. To improve
terrestrial CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; flux estimates by inverse modelling using SCIAMACHY
measurements at 1.6&amp;mu;m, aerosol correction will be needed. Methods for
correcting aerosol-induced errors exist, but so far mainly on the basis of
theoretical considerations. As demonstrated by this study, SCIAMACHY may
contribute to a verification of such methods using real data.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

