<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/inc/acpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7367</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7375</eissn>
		<volume_number>5</volume_number>
		<issue_number>2</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2005</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acpd-5-2269-2005</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/2269/2005/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/2269/2005/acpd-5-2269-2005.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/5/2269/2005/acpd-5-2269-2005.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>2269</start_page>
	<end_page>2295</end_page>
	<publication_date>2005-04-13</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Validation of ENVISAT/SCIAMACHY columnar methane by solar FTIR spectrometry at the Ground-Truthing Station Zugspitze</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>R. Sussmann</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>W. Stremme</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>M. Buchwitz</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="2">
			<name>R. de Beek</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">IMK-IFU, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Institute of Environmental Physics (iup), University of Bremen FB1, Bremen, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Methane total-vertical column retrievals from ground-based solar FTIR
measurements at the Permanent Ground-Truthing Station Zugspitze (47.42&amp;deg; N,
10.98&amp;deg; E, 2964 m&amp;nbsp;a.s.l.), Germany are used to validate column averaged
methane retrieved from ENVISAT/SCIAMACHY spectra by WFM-DOAS (WFMD) version
0.4 and 0.41 for 153 days in 2003. Smoothing errors are estimated to be
below 0.10% for FTIR and 0.14% for SCIAMACHY-WFMD retrievals and can
be neglected for the assessment of observed bias and day-to-day-scatter. In
order to minimize the altitude-difference effect, dry-air column averaged
mixing ratios (XCH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;) have been utilized. From the FTIR-time series of
XCH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; an atmospheric day-to-day variability of 1% was found, and a
sinusoidal annual cycle with a &amp;asymp;1.6% amplitude. To obtain the
WFMD bias, a polynomial fitted to the FTIR series was used as a reference.
The result is WFMD v0.4/FTIR=1.008&amp;plusmn;0.019 and WFMD v0.41/FTIR=1.058&amp;plusmn;0.008.
WFMD v0.41 was significantly improved by a
time-dependent bias correction. It can still not capture the natural
day-to-day variability, i.e., the standard deviation calculated from the
daily-mean values is 2.4% using averages within a 2000-km radius, and
2.7% for a 1000-km radius. These numbers are dominated by a residual
time-dependent bias in the order of 3%/month. The latter can be
reduced, e.g., from 2.4% to 1.6% as shown by an empirical
time-dependent bias correction. Standard deviations of the daily means,
calculated from the individual measurements of each day, are excluding
time-dependent biases, thus showing the potential precision of WFMD daily
means, i.e., 0.3% for a 2000-km selection radius, and 0.6% for a
1000-km selection radius. Therefore, the natural variability could be
captured under the prerequisite of further advanced time-dependent bias
corrections, or the use of other channels, where the icing issue is less
prominent.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

